Citation Analysis – \Large Dynamic Spatial Interaction Models for a Resource Allocator’s Decisions and Local Agents’ Multiple Activities

\Large Dynamic Spatial Interaction Models for a Resource Allocator’s Decisions and Local Agents’ Multiple Activities
Hanbat Jeong
https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.13810

133

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

11,507

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Case, A.C. and Rosen, H.S. and Hines, J.R.Jr	1993	5	4	7.5	0.038	1.000	100%
2	Yang, K. and Lee, L.F.	2017	6	6	10.5	0.045	1.000	100%
3	Rothenberg, T. J.	1971	4	3	7.0	0.030	0.928	100%
4	Albert Solé-Ollé	2006	4	4	5.5	0.030	0.928	100%
5	Brian Knight	2002	4	3	6.5	0.030	0.928	100%
6	Yang, K. and Lee, L.F.	2019	4	4	6.5	0.030	0.928	100%
7	Agrawal, D.R. and Hoyt, W.H. and Wilson, J.D.	2022	6	2	7.5	0.045	0.874	100%
8	Jackson, O. and Zenou, Y.	2015	3	3	3.5	0.023	0.843	100%
9	Hsieh, C. and Lin, X	2021	3	3	3.5	0.023	0.843	100%
10	Chen, Y-J and Zenou, Y. and Zhou, J.	2018	3	3	4.5	0.023	0.843	100%
11	Han, X. and Lee, L.F.	2016	4	2	6.5	0.030	0.811	100%
12	de Paula, A. and Rasul, I. and Souza, P.	2024	4	2	6.5	0.030	0.811	100%
13	Katherine Baicker	2005	3	2	4.5	0.023	0.737	100%
14	Jeong, H. and Lee, L.F. (self)	2020	3	2	4.5	0.023	0.737	100%
15	Helsley, R.W. and Zenou, Y.	2014	3	2	4.5	0.023	0.737	100%
16	Cohen-Cole, E. and Liu, X. and Zenou, Y.	2017	3	2	4.5	0.023	0.737	100%
17	Brueckner, J. K.	2003	2	2	2.5	0.015	0.644	100%
18	Revelli, F.	2005	2	2	2.5	0.015	0.644	100%
19	Jeong, H. and Lee, L.F. (self)	2021	2	2	2.5	0.015	0.644	100%
20	Díaz, C. and Patacchini, E. and Verdier, T. and Ze...	2021	2	2	2.5	0.015	0.644	100%
21	Lee, L.F.	2004	2	2	2.5	0.015	0.644	100%
22	Belhaj, M. and Deroïan, F.	2014	2	2	2.5	0.015	0.644	100%
23	Liu, X.	2014	2	2	2.5	0.015	0.644	100%
24	Kelejian, H.H. and Prucha, I.R.	2004	2	2	2.5	0.015	0.644	100%
25	Baltagi, B.H. and Deng, Y.	2015	2	2	2.5	0.015	0.644	100%
26	Xiaodong Liu and Paulo Saraiva	2019	2	2	2.5	0.015	0.644	100%
27	Zhu, X. and Huang, D. and Pan, R. and Wang, H.	2020	2	2	2.5	0.015	0.644	100%
28	Yang, K. and Lee, L.F.	2021	2	2	2.5	0.015	0.644	100%
29	Amba, M.C.O. and Mbratana, T. and Le Gallo, J.	2003	2	2	2.5	0.015	0.644	100%
30	Drukker, D.M. and Egger, P.H. and Prucha, I.R.	2023	2	2	2.5	0.015	0.644	100%
31	Lu, L.	2023	2	2	2.5	0.015	0.644	100%
32	Katz, L.	1953	2	2	2.5	0.015	0.644	100%
33	Bonacich, P.	1987	2	2	2.5	0.015	0.644	100%
34	LeSage, J.and Pace, R.K.	2008	2	2	2.5	0.015	0.644	100%
35	Bloch, F. and Jackson, M.O. and Tebaldi	2023	2	2	2.5	0.015	0.644	100%
36	Figlio, D.N. and Kolpin, V.M. and Reid, W.E.	1999	2	2	4.0	0.015	0.644	100%
37	Xu, X. and Lee, L.F.	2015	2	1	4.0	0.015	0.511	100%
38	Thomas J. Holmes and Holger Sieg	2015	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
39	Steve Gibbons and Henry G. Overman and Eleonora Pa...	2015	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
40	Di Porto, E. and Revelli, F.	2013	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
41	Barro, R.J	1990	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
42	Federico Revelli	2003	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
43	Ljungqvist, L. and Sargent, T.J.	2012	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
44	Ballester, C. and Calv$\overlineo	2006	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
45	Calv$\overlineo	2009	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
46	Bramoull\'e	2014	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
47	Blume, L.E. and Brock, W.A. and Durlauf, S.N. and ...	2015	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
48	Boucher, V.	2016	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
49	Manski, C.	1993	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
50	Moffitt, R	2001	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
51	Bramoull\'e	2009	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
52	Cliff, A. D. and Ord, J.K.	1995	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
53	Ord, J.K.	1975	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
54	Elhorst, J.P. and Gross, M. and Tereanu, E.	2021	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
55	Todd, Petra E. and Wolpin, Kenneth I.	2003	1	1	2.0	0.008	0.406	100%
56	Tauchen, G.	1985	1	1	2.0	0.008	0.406	100%
57	Yu, J. and de Jong, R. and Lee, L.F.	2008	1	1	2.0	0.008	0.406	100%
58	Lee, L.F. and Yu, J.	2010	1	1	2.0	0.008	0.406	100%
59	Frank, M.W.	2009	1	1	2.0	0.008	0.406	100%
60	Timothy Besley and Anne Case	1995	1	1	2.0	0.008	0.406	100%
61	Akaike, H.	1973	1	1	2.0	0.008	0.406	100%
62	Zhang, X. and Yu, J.	2018	1	1	2.0	0.008	0.406	100%
63	Jeong, H. and Lee, L.F. (self)	2024	1	1	2.0	0.008	0.406	100%
64	Wang, J.	2018	1	1	2.0	0.008	0.406	100%
65	BISWA NATH DATTA	2004	1	1	2.0	0.008	0.406	100%
66	Lee, L.F. and Yu, J.	2016	1	1	2.0	0.008	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Case, A.C. and Rosen, H.S. and Hines, J.R.Jr

1993

7.5

0.038

1.000

100%

Yang, K. and Lee, L.F.

2017

10.5

0.045

1.000

100%

Rothenberg, T. J.

1971

7.0

0.030

0.928

100%

Albert Solé-Ollé

2006

5.5

0.030

0.928

100%

Brian Knight

2002

6.5

0.030

0.928

100%

Yang, K. and Lee, L.F.

2019

6.5

0.030

0.928

100%

Agrawal, D.R. and Hoyt, W.H. and Wilson, J.D.

2022

7.5

0.045

0.874

100%

Jackson, O. and Zenou, Y.

2015

3.5

0.023

0.843

100%

Hsieh, C. and Lin, X

2021

3.5

0.023

0.843

100%

Chen, Y-J and Zenou, Y. and Zhou, J.

2018

4.5

0.023

0.843

100%

Han, X. and Lee, L.F.

2016

6.5

0.030

0.811

100%

de Paula, A. and Rasul, I. and Souza, P.

2024

6.5

0.030

0.811

100%

Katherine Baicker

2005

4.5

0.023

0.737

100%

Jeong, H. and Lee, L.F. (self)

2020

4.5

0.023

0.737

100%

Helsley, R.W. and Zenou, Y.

2014

4.5

0.023

0.737

100%

Cohen-Cole, E. and Liu, X. and Zenou, Y.

2017

4.5

0.023

0.737

100%

Brueckner, J. K.

2003

2.5

0.015

0.644

100%

Revelli, F.

2005

2.5

0.015

0.644

100%

Jeong, H. and Lee, L.F. (self)

2021

2.5

0.015

0.644

100%

Díaz, C. and Patacchini, E. and Verdier, T. and Ze...

2021

2.5

0.015

0.644

100%

Lee, L.F.

2004

2.5

0.015

0.644

100%

Belhaj, M. and Deroïan, F.

2014

2.5

0.015

0.644

100%

Liu, X.

2014

2.5

0.015

0.644

100%

Kelejian, H.H. and Prucha, I.R.

2004

2.5

0.015

0.644

100%

Baltagi, B.H. and Deng, Y.

2015

2.5

0.015

0.644

100%

Xiaodong Liu and Paulo Saraiva

2019

2.5

0.015

0.644

100%

Zhu, X. and Huang, D. and Pan, R. and Wang, H.

2020

2.5

0.015

0.644

100%

Yang, K. and Lee, L.F.

2021

2.5

0.015

0.644

100%

Amba, M.C.O. and Mbratana, T. and Le Gallo, J.

2003

2.5

0.015

0.644

100%

Drukker, D.M. and Egger, P.H. and Prucha, I.R.

2023

2.5

0.015

0.644

100%

Lu, L.

2023

2.5

0.015

0.644

100%

Katz, L.

1953

2.5

0.015

0.644

100%

Bonacich, P.

1987

2.5

0.015

0.644

100%

LeSage, J.and Pace, R.K.

2008

2.5

0.015

0.644

100%

Bloch, F. and Jackson, M.O. and Tebaldi

2023

2.5

0.015

0.644

100%

Figlio, D.N. and Kolpin, V.M. and Reid, W.E.

1999

4.0

0.015

0.644

100%

Xu, X. and Lee, L.F.

2015

4.0

0.015

0.511

100%

Thomas J. Holmes and Holger Sieg

2015

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Steve Gibbons and Henry G. Overman and Eleonora Pa...

2015

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Di Porto, E. and Revelli, F.

2013

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Barro, R.J

1990

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Federico Revelli

2003

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Ljungqvist, L. and Sargent, T.J.

2012

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Ballester, C. and Calv$\overlineo

2006

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Calv$\overlineo

2009

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Bramoull\'e

2014

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Blume, L.E. and Brock, W.A. and Durlauf, S.N. and ...

2015

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Boucher, V.

2016

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Manski, C.

1993

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Moffitt, R

2001

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Bramoull\'e

2009

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Cliff, A. D. and Ord, J.K.

1995

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Ord, J.K.

1975

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Elhorst, J.P. and Gross, M. and Tereanu, E.

2021

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Todd, Petra E. and Wolpin, Kenneth I.

2003

2.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Tauchen, G.

1985

2.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Yu, J. and de Jong, R. and Lee, L.F.

2008

2.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Lee, L.F. and Yu, J.

2010

2.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Frank, M.W.

2009

2.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Timothy Besley and Anne Case

1995

2.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Akaike, H.

1973

2.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Zhang, X. and Yu, J.

2018

2.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Jeong, H. and Lee, L.F. (self)

2024

2.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Wang, J.

2018

2.0

0.008

0.406

100%

BISWA NATH DATTA

2004

2.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Lee, L.F. and Yu, J.

2016

2.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.