← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Revealed Information
Laura Doval, Ran Eilat, Tianhao Liu, Yangfan Zhou
https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.13293
103
Citation mentions
51
Cited references
10
Sections
10,473
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Kamenica, E. and M. Gentzkow 2011 4 3 7.0 0.039 0.928 100%
2 Azrieli, Y. and J. Rehbeck 2022 5 2 8.0 0.049 0.874 100%
3 Gale, D. 1957 16 3 21.0 0.155 0.855 62%
4 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2022 3 3 5.0 0.029 0.843 100%
5 Strassen, V. 1965 7 5 8.5 0.068 0.830 57%
6 Kolotilin, A., R. Corrao, and A. Wolitzky 2025 6 3 5.5 0.058 0.794 50%
7 Ziegler, G. M. 2012 5 2 7.0 0.049 0.737 60%
8 Bergemann, D. and S. Morris 2016 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
9 Molchanov, I. and F. Molinari 2018 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
10 Myerson, R. B. 1982 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
11 Rambachan, A. 2024 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
12 Lu, J. 2016 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
13 Rehbeck, J. 2023 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
14 De Oliveira, H. and R. Lamba 2022 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
15 Caplin, A., D. J. Martin, and P. Marx 2023 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
16 Arieli, I., Y. Babichenko, F. Sandomirskiy, and O.... 2021 2 2 1.5 0.019 0.511 50%
17 Galichon, A. and M. Henry 2011 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
18 Kneeland, T. 2015 2 2 2.5 0.019 0.511 50%
19 Arieli, I. and Y. Babichenko 2019 2 2 2.5 0.019 0.511 50%
20 Dickstein, M. J. and E. Morales 2018 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
21 Dickstein, M. J., J. Jeon, and E. Morales 2024 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
22 Gualdani, C. and S. Sinha 2024 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
23 Syrgkanis, V., E. Tamer, and J. Ziani 2017 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
24 Magnolfi, L. and C. Roncoroni 2023 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
25 Cohen, A. and L. Einav 2007 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
26 Barseghyan, L., J. Prince, and J. C. Teitelbaum 2011 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
27 Barseghyan, L., F. Molinari, T. O'Donoghue, and J.... 2013 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
28 Khaw, M. W., Z. Li, and M. Woodford 2021 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
29 Enke, B. and T. Graeber 2023 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
30 Caplin, A. and M. Dean 2015 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
31 Caplin, A., M. Dean, and J. Leahy 2022 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
32 Chambers, C. P., C. Liu, and J. Rehbeck (self) 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
33 Dewan, A. and N. Neligh 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
34 Denti, T. 2022 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
35 Ergin, H. and T. Sarver 2010 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
36 Dillenberger, D., J. S. Lleras, P. Sadowski, and N... 2014 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
37 Dillenberger, D., R. V. Krishna, and P. Sadowski 2023 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
38 Morris, S. E. 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
39 Vohra, A., J. Toikka, and R. Vohra 2023 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
40 Strack, P. and K. H. Yang 2024 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
41 Beresteanu, A., I. Molchanov, and F. Molinari 2011 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
42 Bergemann, D., B. Brooks, and S. Morris 2015 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
43 Das, S., S. R. Dev, and S. Sarvottamananda 2024 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
44 Weibel, C. 2007 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
45 Rockafellar, R. T. 1970 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
46 Border, K. C. 1991 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
47 Yang, K. H. and A. K. Zentefis 2024 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
48 Kolotilin, A. and A. Wolitzky 2024 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
49 Aliprantis, C. D. and K. C. Border 2013 2 1 1.0 0.019 0.110 0%
50 Kolotilin, A. 2018 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.087 0%
51 Serfozo, R. 1982 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.