Citation Analysis

Lee Bounds with a Continuous Treatment \\ in Sample Selection
Ying-Ying Lee, Chu-An Liu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04312
138
Citation mentions
58
Cited references
11
Sections
14,869
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Chernozhukov, Victor and Chetverikov, Denis and De... 2018 6 4 11.0 0.043 1.000 100%
2 Anna Aizer and Nancy Early and Shari Eli and Guido... (self) 2024 7 3 10.5 0.051 0.950 86%
3 Lee, David (self) 2009 19 7 23.5 0.138 0.944 84%
4 Vira Semenova 2024 6 4 9.5 0.043 0.941 83%
5 Kyle Colangelo and Ying-Ying Lee (self) 2025 16 6 26.5 0.116 0.933 81%
6 Carlos A. Flores and Alfonso Flores-Lagunes and Ar... 4 3 7.0 0.029 0.928 100%
7 Imbens, Guido Wilhelm and Angrist, Joshua D. 1994 4 4 5.5 0.029 0.843 75%
8 Bo E. Honoré and Luojia Hu 2020 4 3 2.5 0.029 0.843 75%
9 Chen, Jiafeng and Roth, Jonathan 2023 3 3 3.5 0.022 0.843 100%
10 Edward Vytlacil 2002 4 2 7.0 0.029 0.811 100%
11 John DiNardo and Jordan Matsudaira and Justin McCr... 2021 3 2 4.5 0.022 0.737 100%
12 Yu-Chin Hsu and Martin Huber and Ying-Ying Lee and... (self) 2023 3 3 4.5 0.022 0.737 67%
13 Horowitz, J. L. and Manski, C. F. 1995 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
14 Guido W. Imbens and Whitney K. Newey 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
15 Kory Kroft and Ismael Mourifi\'e 2024 2 2 2.5 0.014 0.644 100%
16 Behaghel, Luc and Crépon, Bruno and Gurgand, Marc ... 2015 2 2 2.5 0.014 0.644 100%
17 Powell, James L. and Stoker, Thomas M. 2 2 4.0 0.014 0.644 100%
18 Liangjun Su and Takuya Ura and Yichong Zhang 2019 2 2 4.0 0.014 0.644 100%
19 2 2 4.0 0.014 0.644 100%
20 3 3 3.0 0.022 0.585 33%
21 Heckman, James 1976 2 2 1.5 0.014 0.511 50%
22 Heckman, James J. 1979 2 2 1.5 0.014 0.511 50%
23 Bruce E. Hansen 2022 3 2 3.0 0.022 0.511 33%
24 Junni L. Zhang and Donald B. Rubin and Fabrizia Me... 2009 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
25 Angrist, J. and Imbens, G. and Rubin, D. 1996 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
26 Peter Z. Schochet and John Burghardt and Sheena Mc... 2008 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
27 Rubin, D. B. 1980 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
28 Junni L. Zhang and Donald B. Rubin 2003 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
29 Francois Gerard and Miikka Rokkanen and Christoph ... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
30 Yanqin Fan and Sang Soo Park 2010 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
31 Bo E. Honoré and Luojia Hu 2022 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
32 Pablo Estrada 2024 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
33 Phillip Heiler 2024 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
34 Tomasz Olma 2021 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
35 Patrick Kline and Andres Santos 2013 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
36 Ho, Kate and Rosen, Adam M. 2017 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
37 Francesca Molinari 2020 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
38 Kline, Brendan and Tamer, Elie 2023 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
39 Hyungtaik Ahn and James L. Powell 1993 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
40 Mitali Das and Whitney K. Newey and Francis Vella 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
41 Juan Carlos Escanciano and David T. Jacho-Ch\'a 2016 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
42 Robert Garlick and Joshua Hyman 2022 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
43 Heckman, James and Smith, Jeffrey and Clements, Na... 1997 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
44 Amilcar Velez 2025 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
45 Powell, James L and Stock, James H and Stoker, Tho... 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
46 Hsu, Yu-Chin and Huber, Martin and Liu, Chu-An and... (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
47 Yu-Chin Hsu and Martin Huber and Ying-Ying Lee and... (self) 2020 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
48 Edward H. Kennedy and Zongming Ma and Matthew D. M... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
49 Chernozhukov, Victor and Newey, Whitney K and Sing... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
50 Alexander D’Amour and Peng Ding and Avi Feller and... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
51 Max H. Farrell 2015 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
52 Victor Chernozhukov and Whitney Newey and Rahul Si... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
53 Belloni, A. and Chernozhukov, V. and Fern\'a 2017 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
54 Ying-Ying Lee (self) 2015 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
55 Wallice Ao and Sebastian Calonico and Ying-Ying Le... (self) 2021 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
56 Cesarini, David and Erik Lindqvist and Matthew J. ... 2017 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
57 Bruce E. Hansen 2022 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
58 Keisuke Hirano and Guido W. Imbens and Geert Ridde... 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.