← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

An Adversarial Approach to Identification
Irene Botosaru, Isaac Loh, Chris Muris
https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04239
144
Citation mentions
78
Cited references
14
Sections
19,467
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Honore 2006 6 4 9.0 0.042 1.000 100%
2 Chernozhukov, Victor and Ferna 2013 10 6 17.0 0.069 1.000 100%
3 A.W. Van der Vaart and Jon Wellner 1996 12 4 24.0 0.083 1.000 100%
4 Chesher, Andrew and Rosen, Adam M. and Zhang, Yuan... 2024 4 3 5.0 0.028 0.928 100%
5 Bonhomme, Ste 2012 4 3 5.0 0.028 0.928 100%
6 Manski, Charles F 1987 4 3 5.0 0.028 0.928 100%
7 Bogachev, V.I. 2007 6 2 12.0 0.042 0.874 100%
8 Torgovitsky, Alexander 2019 3 3 3.5 0.021 0.843 100%
9 Winkler, Gerhard 4 2 8.0 0.028 0.811 100%
10 Arellano, Manuel and Bonhomme, Ste 2011 3 2 2.0 0.021 0.737 100%
11 Schennach, Susanne M. 2014 3 2 4.5 0.021 0.737 100%
12 Beresteanu, A. and Molchanov, Ilya and Molinari, F... 2011 2 2 2.5 0.014 0.644 100%
13 Gu, Jiaying and Russell, Thomas 2024 2 2 2.5 0.014 0.644 100%
14 Aristodemou, Eleni 2021 2 2 2.5 0.014 0.644 100%
15 Irene Botosaru and Chris Muris (self) 2024 2 2 2.5 0.014 0.644 100%
16 Bonhomme, Ste 2023 2 2 2.5 0.014 0.644 100%
17 Chamberlain, Gary 2010 2 2 4.0 0.014 0.644 100%
18 Bogachev, V.I. 2007 2 2 4.0 0.014 0.644 100%
19 Santos, Andres 2012 2 2 2.5 0.014 0.644 100%
20 Isaac Loh (self) 2024 2 2 2.5 0.014 0.644 100%
21 Imbens, Guido W. and Manski, Charles F. 2004 2 2 2.5 0.014 0.644 100%
22 Oliver Linton and Kyungchul Song and Yoon-Jae Whan... 2010 2 2 4.0 0.014 0.644 100%
23 Gu, Jiaying and Russell, Thomas and Stringham, Tho... 2024 2 1 1.0 0.014 0.511 100%
24 Davezies, Laurent and D'Haultfoe 2023 2 1 1.0 0.014 0.511 100%
25 Arellano, Manuel and Honore 2001 2 1 1.0 0.014 0.511 100%
26 Honore 2021 2 1 1.0 0.014 0.511 100%
27 Li, Lixiong 2019 2 1 4.0 0.014 0.511 100%
28 Bertanha, Marinho and Moreira, Marcelo J. 2020 2 1 4.0 0.014 0.511 100%
29 Stinchcombe, Maxwell B. and White, Halbert 1992 2 1 4.0 0.014 0.511 100%
30 Kaji, Tetsuya and Manresa, Elena and Pouliot, Guil... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
31 Christensen, Timothy and Connault, Benjamin 2023 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
32 Bontemps, Christian and Magnac, Thierry 2017 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
33 Canay, Ivan A. and Shaikh, Azeem 2017 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
34 Molinari, Francesca 2020 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
35 Chesher, Andrew and Rosen, Adam M. 2020 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
36 Kline, Brendan and Tamer, Elie 2023 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
37 Chesher, Andrew and Rosen, Adam M. 2017 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
38 Galichon, Alfred and Henry, Marc 2009 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
39 Ekeland, Ivar and Galichon, Alfred and Henry, Marc 2010 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
40 Galichon, Alfred and Henry, Marc 2011 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
41 Tebaldi, Pietro and Torgovitsky, Alexander and Yan... 2023 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
42 Tamer, E. 2003 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
43 Honore 2008 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
44 Aguirregabiria, Victor and Carro, Jesus M. 2024 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
45 Dano, Kevin 2023 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
46 Arkhangelsky, Dmitry and Imbens, Guido 2024 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
47 Khan, Shakeeb and Ponomareva, Maria and Tamer, Eli... 2023 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
48 Botosaru, Irene and Muris, Chris and Pendakur, Kri... (self) 2023 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
49 Mbakop, Eric 2023 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
50 Gao, Wayne Yuan and Wang, Rui 2024 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
51 Dobronyi, Christopher and Gu, Jiaying and il Kim, ... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
52 Pakel, Cavit and Weidner, Martin 2024 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
53 Arellano, Manuel and Carrasco, Raquel 2003 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
54 Pigini, Claudia and Bartolucci, Francesco 2022 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
55 Chamberlain, Gary 2023 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
56 Manski, Charles F. 1975 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
57 Komarova, Tatiana 2013 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
58 Blevins, Jason R. 2015 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
59 Rasch, Georg 1960 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
60 Rasch, Georg 1961 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
61 Gretton, A. and Borgwardt, K. and Rasch, M. and Sc... 2007 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
62 Gretton, A. and Borgwardt, K. M. and Rasch, M. J. ... 2012 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
63 Tsybakov, A.B. 2008 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
64 Ghosal, Subhashis and van der Vaart, Aad 2017 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
65 Fremlin, D.H. 2000 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
66 Conway, J.B. 1994 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
67 Stenger, J. and Gamboa, F. and Keller, M. 2021 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
68 Patrik Guggenberger and Jinyong Hahn and Kyooil Ki... 2008 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
69 Andrews, Donald W. K. and Soares, Gustavo 2010 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
70 Federico A. Bugni and Ivan A. Canay and Xiaoxia Sh... 2015 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
71 Victor Chernozhukov and Whitney K Newey and Andres... 2023 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
72 Mathieu Marcoux and Thomas M. Russell and Yuanyuan... 2024 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
73 Yu Zhu 2020 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
74 Folland, G.B. 1999 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
75 Cohn, D.L. 2013 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
76 Maurice Sion 1958 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
77 Bruce Driver 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
78 Alexander S. Kechris 1995 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.