← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Estimating Nonseparable Selection Models: \\ A Functional Contraction Approach
Fan Wu, Yi Xin
https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01799
108
Citation mentions
53
Cited references
11
Sections
8,748
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Cosconati, Marco and Xin, Yi and Wu, Fan and Jin, ... (self) 2025 10 3 14.0 0.093 1.000 100%
2 Hu, Yingyao 2008 7 4 10.0 0.065 0.894 71%
3 Arellano, Manuel and Bonhomme, Ste 2017 4 2 6.0 0.037 0.811 100%
4 Goldberg, Pinelopi Koujianou 1996 3 2 4.0 0.028 0.737 100%
5 Crawford, Gregory S and Pavanini, Nicola and Schiv... 2018 3 2 4.0 0.028 0.737 100%
6 Chernozhukov, Victor and Fern\'a 2025 3 2 3.0 0.028 0.737 100%
7 Hu, Yingyao and Schennach, Susanne M 2008 3 3 3.5 0.028 0.737 67%
8 Newey, Whitney K and McFadden, Daniel 1994 7 3 6.5 0.065 0.659 29%
9 Allen, Jason and Clark, Robert and Hickman, Brent ... 2024 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
10 Berry, Steven T 1994 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
11 Steven Berry and James Levinsohn and Ariel Pakes 1995 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
12 Krasnokutskaya, Elena and Song, Kyungchul and Tang... 2020 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
13 Athey, Susan and Haile, Philip A 2007 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
14 D’Haultfoe 2019 3 1 3.0 0.028 0.585 100%
15 Cicala, Steve 2015 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
16 Allen, Jason and Clark, Robert and Houde, Jean-Fra... 2019 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
17 Sagl, Stephan 2023 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
18 Athey, Susan and Haile, Philip A 2002 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
19 Komarova, Tatiana 2013 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
20 Guerre, Emmanuel and Luo, Yao 2019 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
21 Heckman, James J 1974 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
22 Lee, Lung-Fei 1982 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
23 Heckman, James J 1976 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
24 Newey, Whitney K 2007 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
25 Ivan Fernández-Val and Aico van Vuuren 2024 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
26 Vella, Francis 1998 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
27 McKelvey, Richard D and Palfrey, Thomas R 1995 5 2 4.0 0.046 0.511 20%
28 Gronau, Reuben 1974 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Roy, Andrew Donald 1951 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Lee, Lung-Fei 1983 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Heckman, James J 1979 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Ahn, Hyungtaik and Powell, James L 1993 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Andrews, Donald WK and Schafgans, Marcia MA 1998 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Chen, Songnian and Khan, Shakeeb 2003 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Das, Mitali and Newey, Whitney K and Vella, Franci... 2003 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Newey, Whitney K 2009 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 D’Haultfoeuille, Xavier and Maurel, Arnaud 2013 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 D’Haultfoe 2018 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Meilijson, Isaac 1981 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Thompson, Anthony C 1963 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Amit Gandhi AND Zhentong Lu AND Xiaoxia Shi 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Baricz, A 2008 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Allen, Jason and Clark, Robert and Houde, Jean-Fra... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Flambard, Ve 2006 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Hendricks, Kenneth and Porter, Robert H 1988 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 De Silva, Dakshina G and Kosmopoulou, Georgia and ... 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
47 Campo, Sandra 2012 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
48 Horta\cc 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
49 Asker, John and Cantillon, Estelle 2008 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
50 Lewis, Gregory and Bajari, Patrick 2011 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
51 Nakabayashi, Jun 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
52 Yoganarasimhan, Hema 2016 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
53 Takahashi, Hidenori 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.