← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Higher-Order Causal Message Passing for Experimentation with Complex Interference
Mohsen Bayati, Yuwei Luo, William Overman, Sadegh Shirani, Ruoxuan Xiong
https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00945
103
Citation mentions
66
Cited references
7
Sections
3,808
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Cortez, Mayleen and Eichhorn, Matthew and Yu, Chri... 2022 6 3 9.0 0.058 1.000 100%
2 Shirani, Sadegh and Bayati, Mohsen (self) 2024 11 4 16.0 0.107 1.000 100%
3 Leung, Michael P 2022 4 2 6.0 0.039 0.811 100%
4 Sussman, Daniel L and Airoldi, Edoardo M 2017 3 2 3.0 0.029 0.737 100%
5 Su Jia and Nathan Kallus and Christina Lee Yu 2024 3 2 4.0 0.029 0.737 100%
6 Imbens, Guido W and Rubin, Donald B 2015 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
7 Chen, Qianyi and Li, Bo and Deng, Lu and Wang, Yon... 2024 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
8 Bayati, Mohsen and Montanari, Andrea (self) 2011 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
9 Eckles, Dean and Karrer, Brian and Ugander, Johan 2016 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
10 Li, Shuangning and Wager, Stefan 2022 3 1 3.0 0.029 0.585 100%
11 Agarwal, Anish and Cen, Sarah and Shah, Devavrat a... 2022 3 1 3.0 0.029 0.585 100%
12 Holtz, David and Lobel, Ruben and Liskovich, Iness... 2020 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
13 Johari, Ramesh and Li, Hannah and Liskovich, Iness... 2022 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
14 Bright, Ido and Delarue, Arthur and Lobel, Ilan 2022 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
15 Aronow, Peter M and Samii, Cyrus 2017 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
16 Hudgens, Michael G and Halloran, M Elizabeth 2012 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
17 Jagadeesan, Ravi and Pillai, Natesh S and Volfovsk... 2020 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
18 Farias, Vivek and Li, Andrew and Peng, Tianyi and ... 2022 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
19 Cox, David Roxbee 1958 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
20 Rubin, Donald B 1978 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
21 Manski, Charles F 1990 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
22 Bond, Robert M and Fariss, Christopher J and Jones... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
23 Blake, Thomas and Coey, Dominic 2014 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
24 Choi, David 2017 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
25 Manski, Charles F 2013 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
26 Basse, Guillaume W and Airoldi, Edoardo M 2018 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
27 Karwa, Vishesh and Airoldi, Edoardo M 2018 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
28 Forastiere, Laura and Mealli, Fabrizia and Wu, Alb... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
29 Mezard, M and Parisi, G and Virasoro, M 1986 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
30 Mezard, Marc and Montanari, Andrea 2009 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
31 Donoho, David L and Maleki, Arian and Montanari, A... 2009 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
32 Kohavi, Ron and Tang, Diane and Xu, Ya 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
33 Sobel, Michael E 2006 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
34 Rosenbaum, Paul R 2007 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
35 Tchetgen, Eric J Tchetgen and VanderWeele, Tyler J 2012 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
36 Liu, Lan and Hudgens, Michael G 2014 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
37 Kang, Hyunseung and Imbens, Guido 2016 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
38 Viviano, Davide 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
39 Bhattacharya, Rohit and Malinsky, Daniel and Shpit... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
40 Qu, Zhaonan and Xiong, Ruoxuan and Liu, Jizhou and... (self) 2021 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
41 Auerbach, Eric and Tabord-Meehan, Max 2021 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
42 Candogan, Ozan and Chen, Chen and Niazadeh, Rad 2023 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
43 Ugander, Johan and Yin, Hao 2023 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
44 Leung, Michael P 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
45 Viviano, Davide 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
46 Belloni, Alexandre and Fang, Fei and Volfovsky, Al... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
47 Li, Shuangning and Wager, Stefan 2022 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
48 Chin, Alex 2018 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
49 Wang, Ye and Samii, Cyrus and Chang, Haoge and Aro... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
50 Wager, Stefan and Xu, Kuang 2021 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
51 Munro, Evan and Wager, Stefan and Xu, Kuang 2021 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
52 Harshaw, Christopher and S\"a 2022 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
53 Farias, Vivek F and Li, Hao and Peng, Tianyi and R... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
54 Basse, Guillaume W and Feller, Avi and Toulis, Pan... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
55 Jackson, Matthew O and Lin, Zhongjian and Yu, Ning... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
56 Sa 2021 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
57 Boyarsky, Ariel and Namkoong, Hongseok and Pouget-... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
58 Arkhangelsky, Dmitry and Imbens, Guido 2023 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
59 Viviano, Davide and Lei, Lihua and Imbens, Guido a... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
60 Yu, Christina Lee and Airoldi, Edoardo M and Borgs... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
61 Holland, Paul W 1986 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
62 Bolthausen, Erwin 2014 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
63 Xiong, Ruoxuan and Athey, Susan and Bayati, Mohsen... (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
64 Horvitz, Daniel G and Thompson, Donovan J 1952 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
65 Benedek Rozemberczki and Rik Sarkar 2021 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
66 Cai, Jing and Janvry, Alain De and Sadoulet, Elisa... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.