← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Robust Network Targeting with Multiple Nash Equilibria
Guanyi Wang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.20860
221
Citation mentions
121
Cited references
13
Sections
13,945
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Tamer, Elie 2003 5 4 6.0 0.023 1.000 100%
2 Brock, William A and Durlauf, Steven N 2001 6 4 8.5 0.027 1.000 100%
3 Bajari, Patrick and Hong, Han and Krainer, John an... 2010 8 6 12.0 0.036 1.000 100%
4 de Paula, Aureo and Tang, Xun 2012 5 3 7.5 0.023 1.000 100%
5 Morris, Stephen and Oyama, Daisuke and Takahashi, ... 2024 5 3 4.5 0.023 1.000 100%
6 Leung, Michael P 2015 7 5 11.5 0.032 1.000 100%
7 Ridder, Geert and Sheng, Shuyang 2020 5 3 7.0 0.023 1.000 100%
8 9 6 12.5 0.041 0.962 89%
9 Chamberlain, Gary 2000 4 4 5.5 0.018 0.928 100%
10 Galeotti, Andrea and Golub, Benjamin and Goyal, Sa... 2020 4 3 5.0 0.018 0.928 100%
11 Kitagawa, Toru and Wang, Guanyi (self) 2023 5 2 4.0 0.023 0.874 100%
12 Jia, Panle 2008 3 3 3.5 0.014 0.843 100%
13 Jovanovic, Boyan 1989 3 3 3.5 0.014 0.843 100%
14 Bajari, Patrick and Hong, Han and Ryan, Stephen P 2010 3 3 4.5 0.014 0.843 100%
15 Aguirregabiria, Victor and Mira, Pedro 2007 3 3 4.5 0.014 0.843 100%
16 Ciliberto, Federico and Tamer, Elie 2009 3 3 4.5 0.014 0.843 100%
17 Sheng, Shuyang 2020 4 2 5.0 0.018 0.811 100%
18 Kitagawa, Toru and Wang, Guanyi (self) 2023 4 2 3.5 0.018 0.811 100%
19 Topkis, Donald M 1998 4 2 8.0 0.018 0.811 100%
20 Molinari, Francesca and Rosen, A 2008 3 2 5.0 0.014 0.737 100%
21 Chesher, Andrew and Rosen, Adam M 2020 3 2 3.0 0.014 0.737 100%
22 Bian, Andrew An and Buhmann, Joachim M and Krause,... 2017 3 2 6.0 0.014 0.737 100%
23 Alvarez, Fernando E and Argente, David and Lippi, ... 2023 2 2 3.0 0.009 0.644 100%
24 Ballester, Coralio and Calvo 2006 2 2 1.5 0.009 0.644 100%
25 Echenique, Federico and Komunjer, Ivana 2009 2 2 3.0 0.009 0.644 100%
26 Lazzati, Natalia 2015 2 2 3.0 0.009 0.644 100%
27 Graham, Bryan S and Pelican, Andrin 2023 2 2 3.0 0.009 0.644 100%
28 de Paula, Aureo and Tang, Xun 2020 2 2 1.5 0.009 0.644 100%
29 Aguirregabiria, Victor and Mira, Pedro 2019 2 2 2.5 0.009 0.644 100%
30 Aguirregabiria, Victor and Mira, Pedro 2010 2 2 2.5 0.009 0.644 100%
31 Canen, Nathan and Song, Kyungchul 2020 2 2 2.5 0.009 0.644 100%
32 Giacomini, Raffaella and Kitagawa, Toru and Read, ... 2021 2 2 2.5 0.009 0.644 100%
33 Hotz, V Joseph and Miller, Robert A 1993 2 2 4.0 0.009 0.644 100%
34 Xu, Haiqing 2018 2 2 4.0 0.009 0.644 100%
35 Arcidiacono, Peter and Miller, Robert A 2011 2 2 4.0 0.009 0.644 100%
36 Ananth, Abhishek 2020 3 1 1.5 0.014 0.585 100%
37 Munro, Evan and Wager, Stefan and Xu, Kuang 2021 3 1 1.5 0.014 0.585 100%
38 Viviano, Davide 2024 3 1 1.5 0.014 0.585 100%
39 De Paula, Aureo 2013 2 1 2.0 0.009 0.511 100%
40 Mele, Angelo 2017 2 1 1.0 0.009 0.511 100%
41 Jackson, Matthew O and Zenou, Yves 2015 2 1 1.0 0.009 0.511 100%
42 Milgrom, Paul and Roberts, John 1990 2 1 4.0 0.009 0.511 100%
43 Parente, Stephen L and Prescott, Edward C 1994 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
44 Nakajima, Ryo 2007 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
45 Keane, Michael and Wasi, Nada 2013 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
46 Hsiao, Allan 2022 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
47 Molinari, Francesca 2020 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
48 Kline, Brendan and Tamer, Elie 2020 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
49 Bresnahan, Timothy F and Reiss, Peter C 1991 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
50 De Paula, A 2018 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
51 Menzel, Konrad 2016 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
52 Leung, Michael P 2019 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
53 Christakis, Nicholas and Fowler, James and Imbens,... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
54 Chesher, Andrew and Rosen, Adam M 2017 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
55 Lee, Robin S and Pakes, Ariel 2009 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
56 Manski, Charles F 1993 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
57 Goldsmith-Pinkham, Paul and Imbens, Guido W 2013 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
58 De Paula, Aureo and Rasul, Imran and Souza, Pedro 2024 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
59 Manski, Charles F 2004 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
60 Dehejia, Rajeev H 2005 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
61 Stoye, Jo 2009 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
62 Stoye, Jo 2012 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
63 Hirano, Keisuke and Porter, Jack R 2009 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
64 Hirano, Keisuke and Porter, Jack R 2020 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
65 Chamberlain, Gary 2011 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
66 Kitagawa, Toru and Tetenov, Aleksey 2018 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
67 Athey, Susan and Wager, Stefan 2021 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
68 Mbakop, Eric and Tabord-Meehan, Max 2021 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
69 Toru Kitagawa and Shosei Sakaguchi and Aleksey Tet... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
70 Sun, Liyang 2021 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
71 Christensen, Timothy and Moon, Hyungsik Roger and ... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
72 Adjaho, Christopher and Christensen, Timothy 2022 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
73 Kitagawa, Toru and Wang, Weining and Xu, Mengshan (self) 2022 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
74 Fernandez, Andres Aradillas and Olea, Jose 2024 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
75 Munro, Evan 2024 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
76 Chamberlain, Gary 2020 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
77 Chamberlain, Gary 2000 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
78 Hansen, Lars Peter and Sargent, Thomas J 2001 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
79 Hansen, Lars Peter and Sargent, Thomas J 2008 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
80 Manski, Charles F 2003 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
81 Giacomini, Raffaella and Kitagawa, Toru 2021 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
82 Berger, James O 1994 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
83 Christensen, Timothy and Connault, Benjamin 2023 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
84 Morris, Stephen 2000 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
85 Galeotti, Andrea and Goyal, Sanjeev and Jackson, M... 2010 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
86 Mathevet, Laurent 2010 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
87 Gon\cc 2020 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
88 Fu, Hu and Haghpanah, Nima and Hartline, Jason and... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
89 Brooks, Benjamin and Du, Songzi 2024 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
90 Jackson, Matthew O and others 2008 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
91 Sun, Yang and Zhao, Wei and Zhou, Junjie 2023 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
92 Kor, Ryan and Zhou, Junjie 2022 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
93 Harsanyi, John C 1967 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
94 Brouwer, Luitzen Egbertus Jan 1911 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
95 Takahashi, Satoru 2008 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
96 Bulow, Jeremy I and Geanakoplos, John D and Klempe... 1985 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
97 Alvarez, Fernando E and Lippi, Francesco and Souga... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
98 Guren, Adam M 2018 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
99 Milgrom, Paul and Roberts, John 1991 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
100 Milgrom, Paul and Shannon, Chris 1994 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
101 Fudenberg, Drew and Levine, David K 1998 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
102 Chen, Yan and Gazzale, Robert 2004 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
103 Topkis, Donald M 1978 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
104 Tarski, Alfred 1955 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
105 Bloom, Howard S and Orr, Larry L and Bell, Stephen... 1997 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
106 Gu, Jiaying and Russell, Thomas and Stringham, Tho... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
107 Denneberg, Dieter 1994 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
108 Gilboa, Itzhak 2009 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
109 Kaido, Hiroaki and Zhang, Yi 2023 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
110 Segal, Ilya 2003 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
111 Chernozhukov, Victor and Escanciano, Juan Carlos a... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
112 Topkis, Donald M 1979 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
113 Nemhauser, George L and Wolsey, Laurence A and Fis... 1978 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
114 Lawrence, Neil and Seeger, Matthias and Herbrich, ... 2002 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
115 Lova 1983 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
116 Das, Abhimanyu and Kempe, David 2011 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
117 Wang, Yike and Gu, Chris and Otsu, Taisuke (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
118 Grieco, Paul LE 2014 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
119 Berge, Claude 1963 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
120 Wainwright, Martin J 2019 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
121 Hoeffding, Wassily 1963 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.