← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Robust Time Series Causal Discovery for Agent-Based Model Validation
Gene Yu, Ce Guo, Wayne Luk
https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19412
63
Citation mentions
42
Cited references
27
Sections
4,495
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Guerini, M. and Moneta, A. 2017 9 7 18.0 0.143 1.000 100%
2 Runge, J. and Nowack, P. and Kretschmer, M. and Fl... 2019 5 4 10.0 0.079 1.000 100%
3 Assaad, C. K. and Devijver, E. and Gaussier, E. 2022 3 3 6.0 0.048 0.843 100%
4 Hyvärinen, A. and Zhang, K. and Shimizu, S. and Ho... 2010 3 3 6.0 0.048 0.843 100%
5 Fagiolo, G. and Guerini, M. and Lamperti, F. and M... 2019 2 2 4.0 0.032 0.644 100%
6 Sugihara, G. and May, R. and Ye, H. and Hsieh, C.-... 2012 2 2 4.0 0.032 0.644 100%
7 Shimizu, S. and Hoyer, P. O. and Hyvärinen, A. and... 2006 2 2 4.0 0.032 0.644 100%
8 Peters, Jonas and Janzing, Dominik and Schölkopf, ... 2017 2 2 4.0 0.032 0.644 100%
9 Nauta, Meike and Bucur, Doina and Seifert, Christi... 2019 2 1 4.0 0.032 0.511 100%
10 Windrum, P. and Fagiolo, G. and Moneta, A. 2007 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
11 LeBaron, B. 2000 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
12 Farmer J.D. and Foley D. 2009 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
13 Giammario Impullitti and C. Matthias Rebmann 2002 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
14 Raberto, M. and Teglio, A. and Cincotti, S. 2012 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
15 Byrd, D. and Hybinette, M. and Balch, T. H. 2020 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
16 Law, A. M. 2009 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
17 Zeigler, B. P. and Muzy, A. and Kofman, E. 2018 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
18 Cooley, P. and Solano, E. 2017 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
19 Macal, C. M. 2005 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
20 Winker, P. and Gilli, M. and Jeleskovic, V. 2007 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
21 Gilli, M. and Winker, P. 2003 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
22 Grazzini, J. and Richiardi, M. G. and Tsionas, M. 2017 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
23 Grimm, V. and Revilla, E. and Berger, U. and Jelts... 2005 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
24 Lütkepohl, H. 2005 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
25 Ikeuchi, T. and Sato, Y. and Furui, S. and Maekawa... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
26 Granger, C. W. J. 1969 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
27 Entner, D. and Hoyer, P. O. 2010 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
28 Pamfil, R. and Sriwattanaworachai, N. and Desai, S... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
29 Schreiber, T. 2000 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
30 Lamperti, Francesco 2018 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
31 Hagedorn, Christopher and Lange, Constantin and Hu... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
32 Hagedorn, Christopher 2023 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
33 Guo, Ce and Luk, Wayne (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
34 Guo, Ce and Cupello, Diego and Luk, Wayne and Levi... (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
35 Spirtes, Peter and Zhang, Kun 2016 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
36 Cai, Ruichu and Qiao, Jie and Zhang, Kun and Zhang... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
37 Stone, Mervyn 1974 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
38 Arlot, Sylvain and Celisse, Alain 2010 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
39 Kohavi, Ron 1995 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
40 Huber, Peter J. and Ronchetti, Elvezio M. 2011 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
41 Smith, Stephen M. and Miller, Karla L. and Salimi-... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
42 Tsamardinos, Ioannis and Brown, Laura E. and Alife... 2006 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.