← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\sffamily\huge\textbf\titletext
Florian Huber, Christian Matthes, Michael Pfarrhofer
https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17105
113
Citation mentions
56
Cited references
8
Sections
8,462
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Barnichon R, and Brownlees C 2019 8 7 15.0 0.071 1.000 100%
2 Lusompa A 2023 5 2 9.0 0.044 0.874 100%
3 Romer CD, and Romer DH 2004 6 2 12.0 0.053 0.874 100%
4 Ferreira LN, Miranda-Agrippino S, and Ricco G 2025 3 3 5.0 0.027 0.843 100%
5 Jorda O 2005 4 2 6.0 0.035 0.811 100%
6 Li D, Plagborg-M\oller M, and Wolf CK 2024 3 2 5.0 0.027 0.737 100%
7 Grunwald P, and Van Ommen T 2017 3 2 5.0 0.027 0.737 100%
8 Williams CK, and Rasmussen CE 2006 3 2 6.0 0.027 0.737 100%
9 Fisher JD, and Peters R 2010 11 1 22.0 0.097 0.693 100%
10 Ben Zeev N, and Pappa E 2017 8 1 16.0 0.071 0.693 100%
11 Stock JH, and Watson MW 2018 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
12 Plagborg-M\oller M, and Wolf CK 2021 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
13 Holmes CC, and Walker SG 2017 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
14 Tanaka M 2020 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
15 Inoue A, and Kilian L 2022 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
16 Inoue A, Jorda O, and Kuersteiner GM 2025 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
17 Barnichon R, and Matthes C 2018 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
18 Plagborg-M\oller M 2019 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
19 Montiel Olea JL, and Plagborg-M\oller M 2021 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
20 Herbst EP, and Johannsen BK 2024 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
21 Polson NG, and Scott JG 2010 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
22 Schorfheide F 2005 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
23 2 1 4.0 0.018 0.511 100%
24 Sims CA 1980 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Dube A, Girardi D, Jorda O, and Taylor AM 2025 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Ludwig JF 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Baumeister C 2025 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Bhattacharya A, Pati D, and Yang Y 2019 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Mumtaz H, and Piffer M 2025 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Aruoba SB, and Drechsel T 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Xu KL 2023 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 --------- 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Jorda O, and Taylor AM 2025 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Chan JC 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Griffin JE, and Brown PJ 2010 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Park T, and Casella G 2008 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 --------- 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Mertens K, and Ravn MO 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Caldara D, and Herbst E 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Arias JE, Rubio-Ramirez JF, and Waggoner DF 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Carter CK, and Kohn R 1994 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Fruhwirth-Schnatter S 1994 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Kim S, Shephard N, and Chib S 1998 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Jacquier E, Polson NG, and Rossi PE 2002 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Bruns M, Lutkepohl H, and McNeil J 2025 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 Chan JC, Poon A, and Zhu D 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
47 Baumeister C, and Hamilton JD 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
48 Korobilis D 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
49 Sona H, H\aavard R, Martyn P, and Ma\lgorzata R 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
50 Gonzalez-Casasus O, and Schorfheide F 2025 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
51 Newey WK, and West KD 1987 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
52 Piger J, and Stockwell T 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
53 Wieland JF, and Yang MJ 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
54 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
55 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
56 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.