Citation Analysis – Identification of a rank-dependent peer effect model

Identification of a rank-dependent peer effect model
Eyo I. Herstad, Myungkou Shin
https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14317

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

7,432

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Bramoulle	2009	9	4	16.0	0.191	1.000	100%
2	Alne, Ragnar and Herstad, Eyo I. and Myhre, Andrea... (self)	2025	4	2	7.0	0.085	0.811	100%
3	Kang, Changhui	2007	3	2	4.0	0.064	0.737	100%
4	Boucher, Vincent and Rendall, Michelle and Ushchev...	2024	3	1	3.0	0.064	0.585	100%
5	Sacerdote, Bruce	2011	2	1	2.0	0.043	0.511	100%
6	Bramoulle	2020	2	1	2.0	0.043	0.511	100%
7	Manski, Charles F	1993	2	1	2.0	0.043	0.511	100%
8	Foster, Gigi	2006	2	1	2.0	0.043	0.511	100%
9	Han, Li and Li, Tao	2009	2	1	2.0	0.043	0.511	100%
10	Guryan, Jonathan and Kroft, Kory and Notowidigdo, ...	2009	2	1	2.0	0.043	0.511	100%
11	De Paula, Aureo	2013	2	1	4.0	0.043	0.511	100%
12	Masten, Matthew A	2018	1	1	1.0	0.021	0.406	100%
13	Tao, Ji and Lee, Lung-fei	2014	1	1	1.0	0.021	0.406	100%
14	Sacerdote, Bruce	2001	1	1	1.0	0.021	0.406	100%
15	Tincani, Michela M	2024	1	1	1.0	0.021	0.406	100%
16	Gazze, Ludovica and Persico, Claudia and Spirovska...	2024	1	1	2.0	0.021	0.406	100%
17	Goldsmith-Pinkham, Paul and Imbens, Guido W	2013	1	1	2.0	0.021	0.406	100%
18	Hsieh, Chih-Sheng and Lee, Lung Fei	2016	1	1	2.0	0.021	0.406	100%
19	Johnsson, Ida and Moon, Hyungsik Roger	2021	1	1	2.0	0.021	0.406	100%
20	Jochmans, Koen	2023	1	1	2.0	0.021	0.406	100%
21	Belloni, Alexandre and Hansen, Christian and Newey...	2022	1	1	2.0	0.021	0.406	100%
22	Mogstad, Magne and Torgovitsky, Alexander	2024	1	1	2.0	0.021	0.406	100%
23	De Chaisemartin, Cle	2020	1	1	2.0	0.021	0.406	100%
24	Goodman-Bacon, Andrew	2021	1	1	2.0	0.021	0.406	100%
25	Goldsmith-Pinkham, Paul and Hull, Peter and Kolesa	2024+	1	1	2.0	0.021	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Bramoulle

2009

16.0

0.191

1.000

100%

Alne, Ragnar and Herstad, Eyo I. and Myhre, Andrea... (self)

2025

7.0

0.085

0.811

100%

Kang, Changhui

2007

4.0

0.064

0.737

100%

Boucher, Vincent and Rendall, Michelle and Ushchev...

2024

3.0

0.064

0.585

100%

Sacerdote, Bruce

2011

2.0

0.043

0.511

100%

Bramoulle

2020

2.0

0.043

0.511

100%

Manski, Charles F

1993

2.0

0.043

0.511

100%

Foster, Gigi

2006

2.0

0.043

0.511

100%

Han, Li and Li, Tao

2009

2.0

0.043

0.511

100%

Guryan, Jonathan and Kroft, Kory and Notowidigdo, ...

2009

2.0

0.043

0.511

100%

De Paula, Aureo

2013

4.0

0.043

0.511

100%

Masten, Matthew A

2018

1.0

0.021

0.406

100%

Tao, Ji and Lee, Lung-fei

2014

1.0

0.021

0.406

100%

Sacerdote, Bruce

2001

1.0

0.021

0.406

100%

Tincani, Michela M

2024

1.0

0.021

0.406

100%

Gazze, Ludovica and Persico, Claudia and Spirovska...

2024

2.0

0.021

0.406

100%

Goldsmith-Pinkham, Paul and Imbens, Guido W

2013

2.0

0.021

0.406

100%

Hsieh, Chih-Sheng and Lee, Lung Fei

2016

2.0

0.021

0.406

100%

Johnsson, Ida and Moon, Hyungsik Roger

2021

2.0

0.021

0.406

100%

Jochmans, Koen

2023

2.0

0.021

0.406

100%

Belloni, Alexandre and Hansen, Christian and Newey...

2022

2.0

0.021

0.406

100%

Mogstad, Magne and Torgovitsky, Alexander

2024

2.0

0.021

0.406

100%

De Chaisemartin, Cle

2020

2.0

0.021

0.406

100%

Goodman-Bacon, Andrew

2021

2.0

0.021

0.406

100%

Goldsmith-Pinkham, Paul and Hull, Peter and Kolesa

2024+

2.0

0.021

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.