← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

On the Lower Confidence Band for the Optimal Welfare in Policy Learning
Kirill Ponomarev, Vira Semenova
https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.07443
115
Citation mentions
67
Cited references
11
Sections
4,546
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Chernozhukov, V., S. Lee, and A. Rosen 2013 8 4 13.0 0.070 1.000 100%
2 Kitagawa, T. and A. Tetenov 2018b 7 4 13.0 0.061 1.000 100%
3 Andrews, D. W. and G. Soares 2010 6 5 8.5 0.052 0.941 83%
4 Luedtke, A. and M. van der Laan 2016 5 3 5.5 0.043 0.928 80%
5 Canay, I. A. and A. M. Shaikh 2017 4 3 6.0 0.035 0.928 100%
6 Tsybakov, A. B 2004 6 4 7.0 0.052 0.874 67%
7 Mbakop, E. and M. Tabord-Meehan 3 3 5.0 0.026 0.843 100%
8 Athey, S. and S. Wager 3 3 5.0 0.026 0.843 100%
9 Hirano, K. and J. Porter 2012 3 2 4.0 0.026 0.737 100%
10 Romano, J. P., A. M. Shaikh, and M. Wolf 2014 3 2 4.0 0.026 0.737 100%
11 Hahn, J 4 3 5.0 0.035 0.737 50%
12 Mammen, E. and A. B. Tsybakov 1999 2 2 2.0 0.017 0.644 100%
13 Bloom, H. S., L. L. Orr, S. H. Bell, G. Cave, F. D... 1997 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
14 Hirano, K. and J. Porter 2009 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
15 Levis, A. W., M. Bonvini, Z. Zeng, L. Keele, and E... 2023 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
16 Manski, C. F 2004 2 1 2.0 0.017 0.511 100%
17 Chernozhukov, V., S. Lee, A. M. Rosen, and L. Sun 2025 2 1 2.0 0.017 0.511 100%
18 Dehejia, R. H 2005 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
19 Stoye, J 2009 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
20 Chamberlain, G 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
21 Bhattacharya, D. and P. Dupas 2012 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
22 Tetenov, A 2012 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
23 Rai, Y 2019 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
24 Sun, L 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Sasaki, Y. and T. Ura 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Kitagawa, T., S. Lee, and C. Qiu 2022 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Yata, K 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Armstrong, T. B. and S. Shen 2023 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Moon, S 2025 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Qian, M. and S. A. Murphy 2011 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Murphy, S. A 2003 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Robins, J. M 2004 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Shi, C., A. Fan, R. Song, and W. Lu 2018 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Andrews, I., T. Kitagawa, and A. McCloskey 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Andrews, I. and J. Chen 2025 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Chen, Q., M. Austern, and V. Syrgkanis 2023 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Whitehouse, J., M. Austern, and V. Syrgkanis 2025 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Ben-Michael, E 2025 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Ben-Michael, E., D. J. Greiner, K. Imai, and Z. Ji... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Cui, Y. and S. Han 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Adjaho, C. and T. Christensen 2022 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Kasy, M 2016 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Kitagawa, T. and A. Tetenov 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Terschuur, J 2025 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Bai, Y., A. Santos, and A. M. Shaikh 2022 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 Cox, G. F 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
47 Ketz, P. and A. McCloskey 2025 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
48 Lehmann, E. L. and J. P. Romano 2005 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
49 Robins, J. and A. Rotnitzky 1995 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
50 Lehmann, E. L 1959 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
51 Harter, H. L 1964 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
52 Dumbgen, L. and Spokoiny 2001 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
53 Armstrong, T. B 2015 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
54 Berger, R. L 1997 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
55 Chernozhukov, V., W. K. Newey, and A. Santos 2015 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
56 Chernozhukov, V., H. Hong, and E. Tamer 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
57 Armstrong, T. B 2014 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
58 Kallus, N., X. Mao, and A. Zhou 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
59 Kallus, N 2022b 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
60 Kallus, N 2022a 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
61 Semenova, V (self) 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
62 Semenova, V (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
63 Chandrasekhar, A., V. Chernozhukov, F. Molinari, a... 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
64 Liu, Y. and F. Molinari 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
65 Heckman, J., H. Ichimura, and P. Todd 1997 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
66 Abadie, A., J. Angrist, and G. Imbens 2002 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
67 Kitagawa, T. and A. Tetenov 2018a 2 1 1.0 0.017 0.110 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.