Citation Analysis

A new GARCH model with a deterministic time-varying intercept
Niklas Ahlgren, Alexander Back, Timo Teräsvirta
https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03239
100
Citation mentions
66
Cited references
7
Sections
14,809
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Subba Rao, Suhasini 2006 6 4 10.0 0.060 1.000 100%
2 Christian Francq and Jean-Michel Zakoïan 2004 9 6 17.0 0.090 1.000 100%
3 Rainer Dahlhaus and Suhasini Subba Rao 2006 4 3 7.0 0.040 0.928 100%
4 Cristina Amado and Timo Tera 2013 5 2 9.0 0.050 0.874 100%
5 Chen, Bin and Hong, Yongmiao 2016 3 2 4.0 0.030 0.737 100%
6 Stephen J. Taylor 1986 2 2 3.0 0.020 0.644 100%
7 Kristensen, Dennis and Lee, Young Jun 2019 2 2 3.0 0.020 0.644 100%
8 Lionel Truquet 2017 2 2 3.0 0.020 0.644 100%
9 Engle, Robert F and Siriwardane, Emil N 2018 2 2 3.0 0.020 0.644 100%
10 Dahlhaus, Rainer 1997 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
11 McAleer, Michael and Ling, Shiqing 2002 2 2 4.0 0.020 0.644 100%
12 Mikosch, Thomas and St\ua 2004 2 1 2.0 0.020 0.511 100%
13 2 1 2.0 0.020 0.511 100%
14 Hillebrand, Eric 2005 2 1 2.0 0.020 0.511 100%
15 Baillie, Richard T and Morana, Claudio 2009 2 1 2.0 0.020 0.511 100%
16 Chen, Cathy W. S. and Richard Gerlach and Edward M... 2014 2 1 2.0 0.020 0.511 100%
17 He, Changli and Tera 1999 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
18 Mikosch, Thomas and St\ua 2004 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
19 St\ua 2005 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
20 Robert F. Engle 1982 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
21 Tim Bollerslev 1986 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
22 Neelabh Rohan 2013 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
23 Karmakar, Sayar and Richter, Stefan and Wu, Wei 2022 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
24 Dahlhaus, Rainer and Richter, Stefan and Wu, Wei B... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
25 Yanhua Feng 2004 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
26 Se 2004 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
27 Feng, Yuanhua and McNeil, Alexander J 2008 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
28 Christian T. Brownlees and Giampiero M. Gallo 2010 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
29 Santosh Mishra and Liangjun Su and Aman Ullah 2010 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
30 Mazur, Błazej and Pipién, Mateusz 2012 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
31 Koo, Bonsoo and Linton, Oliver 2015 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
32 Sebastien van Bellegem 2012 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
33 Timo Tera 2012 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
34 Francis X. Diebold 1986 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
35 Robert F. Engle and Tim Bollerslev 1986 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
36 Lamoureux, Christopher. G. and Lastrapes, William ... 1990 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
37 Baillie, Richard T and Bollerslev, Tim and Mikkels... 1996 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
38 Chu, James Chia-Shang 1995 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
39 Smith, Daniel R 2008 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
40 István Berkes and Lajos Horváth and Piotr Kokoszka 2003 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
41 Lee, Sang-Won and Hansen, Bruce E 1994 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
42 Robin L. Lumsdaine 1996 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
43 Han, Heejoon and Park, Joon Y. 2012 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
44 Heejoon Han and Dennis Kristensen 2014 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
45 Marcelo C. Medeiros and Alvaro Veiga 2009 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
46 Ambro\vz 2008 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
47 Peter X.- K. Song and Yanqin Fan and John D. Kalbf... 2005 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
48 Ritva Luukkonen and Pentti Saikkonen and Timo Tera 1988 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
49 Ahlgren, Niklas and Back, Alexander and Teräsvirta... (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
50 R. B. Davies 1977 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
51 Hornik, Kurt and Stinchcombe, Maxwell and White, H... 1989 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
52 L. Glosten and R. Jagannathan and D. Runkle 1993 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
53 Dahlhaus, Rainer 2000 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
54 Gut, Allan 2005 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
55 Yinyu Ye 1987 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
56 Alexios Ghalanos and Stefan Theussl 2015 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
57 Line Elvstrøm Ekner and Emil Nejstgaard 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
58 Wooldridge, Jeffrey M 1990 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
59 Philippe Bougerol and Nico Picard 1992 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
60 Boussama, Farid 2000 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
61 Amemiya, Takeshi 1985 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
62 Andrews, Donald WK 1992 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
63 F. Comte and O. Lieberman 2003 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
64 I. V. Basawa and P. D. Feigin and C. C. Heyde 1976 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
65 Wu, Wei Biao 2011 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
66 Wu, Wei Biao and Min, Wanli 2005 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.