← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Smaller Confidence Intervals From IPW Estimators\\ via Data-Dependent Coarsening
Alkis Kalavasis, Anay Mehrotra, Manolis Zampetakis
https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.01658
76
Citation mentions
48
Cited references
15
Sections
11,918
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Wager, Athey 2018 4 3 6.5 0.053 0.928 100%
2 Hernan, Robins 2023 4 3 8.0 0.053 0.928 100%
3 Imbens, Rubin 2015 7 5 10.0 0.092 0.894 71%
4 Wager 2020 3 3 6.0 0.039 0.843 100%
5 McCaffrey, Ridgeway, Morral 2004 3 2 4.5 0.039 0.737 100%
6 Hirano, Imbens, Ridder 2003 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
7 Foster, Syrgkanis 2023 4 2 3.0 0.053 0.644 50%
8 Shalev-Shwartz, Ben-David 2014 2 2 4.0 0.026 0.644 100%
9 Li, Thomas, Li 2018 2 1 2.0 0.026 0.511 100%
10 Bang, Robins 2005 3 2 2.0 0.039 0.511 33%
11 Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, Demirer, Duflo, Hansen,... 2018 3 2 2.0 0.039 0.511 33%
12 Chernozhukov, Newey, Singh 2022 2 1 2.0 0.026 0.511 100%
13 Westreich, Lessler, Funk 2010 2 1 1.0 0.026 0.511 100%
14 Dehejia, Wahba 1998 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
15 Dehejia, Wahba 2002 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
16 Galiani, Gertler, Schargrodsky 2005 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
17 Abadie, Imbens 2006 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
18 Abadie, Imbens 2016 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
19 Rosenbaum 2002 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
20 Rubin 2006 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
21 Rubin 1997 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
22 Christakis, Iwashyna 2003 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
23 Austin 2008 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
24 Brunell, DiNardo 2004 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
25 Sekhon 2004 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
26 Ho, Imai, King, Stuart 2007 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
27 Morgan, Harding 2006 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
28 Lee, Valliant 2009 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
29 Oakes, Kaufman 2017 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
30 Farrell 2015 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
31 Crump, Hotz, Imbens, Mitnik 2009 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
32 Grötschel, Lovasz, Schrijver 2012 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
33 Rosenbaum 2002 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
34 Tan 2006 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
35 Kallus, Mao, Zhou 2019 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
36 Kallus, Zhou 2021 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
37 Huang, Pimentel 2024 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
38 Aronow, Lee 2012 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
39 Huber 2004 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
40 Cohen 1991 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
41 Diakonikolas, Kane 2023 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
42 Chernozhukov, Hansen, Kallus, Spindler, Syrgkanis 2024 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.406 100%
43 Alon, Ben-David, Cesa-Bianchi, Haussler 1997 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
44 Blumer, Ehrenfeucht, Haussler, Warmuth 1989 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
45 Garey, Johnson 1990 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
46 Chen, Goldstein, Shao 2010 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
47 Neyman 1934 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.087 0%
48 Horvitz, Thompson 1952 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.