Citation Analysis – Partially Identified Heterogeneous Treatment Effect with Selection: An Application to Gender Gaps

Partially Identified Heterogeneous Treatment Effect with Selection: An Application to Gender Gaps
Xiaolin Sun, Xueyan Zhao, D. S. Poskitt
https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.01159

153

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

12,676

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Fernández‐Val, I., A. Vuuren, F. Vella, and F. Per...	2023	5	3	8.0	0.033	1.000	100%
2	Blanco, G., C. A. Flores, and A. Flores-Lagunes	2013	7	3	13.0	0.046	1.000	100%
3	Chernozhukov, V., S. Lee, and A. M. Rosen	2013	8	3	15.0	0.052	1.000	100%
4	Huber, M. and G. Mellace	2015	10	6	17.0	0.065	1.000	100%
5	Maasoumi, E. and L. Wang	2019	28	7	44.0	0.183	0.950	86%
6	Lee, D. S	2009	24	13	34.0	0.157	0.909	75%
7	Blundell, R., A. Gosling, H. Ichimura, and C. Megh...	2007	6	2	9.0	0.039	0.874	100%
8	Zhang, J. L., D. B. Rubin, and F. Mealli	2008	6	2	9.0	0.039	0.874	100%
9	Bartalotti, O., D. Kédagni, and V. Possebom	2023	5	2	10.0	0.033	0.874	100%
10	Heckman, J. J	1979	4	2	5.0	0.026	0.811	100%
11	Mulligan, C. B. and Y. Rubinstein	2008	4	2	7.0	0.026	0.811	100%
12	Imbens, G. W. and C. F. Manski	2004	4	2	8.0	0.026	0.811	100%
13	Chesher, A	2010	3	2	6.0	0.020	0.737	100%
14	Huber, M., L. Laffers, and G. Mellace	2017	3	2	6.0	0.020	0.737	100%
15	Newey, W. K. and D. McFadden	1994	4	3	5.0	0.026	0.737	50%
16	Zhang, J. L. and D. B. Rubin	2003	2	2	3.0	0.013	0.644	100%
17	Angrist, J. D., G. W. Imbens, and D. B. Rubin	1996	2	2	4.0	0.013	0.644	100%
18	Blau, F. D. and L. M. Kahn	2017	2	2	4.0	0.013	0.644	100%
19	Heckman, J	1974	2	1	2.0	0.013	0.511	100%
20	Manski, C. F	1990	2	1	2.0	0.013	0.511	100%
21	Chen, X. and C. A. Flores	2015	2	2	2.5	0.013	0.511	50%
22	Blau, F. D	1998	2	1	4.0	0.013	0.511	100%
23	Blau, F. D. and A. H. Beller	1988	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
24	Fernández-Val, I., A. van Vuuren, and F. Vella	2021	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
25	Buchinsky, M. and J. Hahn	1995	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
26	Huber, M	2014	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
27	Arellano, M. and S. Bonhomme	2017b	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
28	Arellano, M. and S. Bonhomme	2017a	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
29	Horowitz, J. L. and C. F. Manski	2000	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
30	Imbens, G. W. and J. D. Angrist	1994	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
31	Mellace, G. and R. Rocci		1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
32	Huber, M	2012	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
33	Huber, M. and G. Mellace	2014	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
34	Holland, P. W	1986	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
35	Imbens, G. W	2004	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
36	Goldin, C	2014	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
37	Blau, F. D. and L. M. Kahn	2006	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
38	Olivetti, C. and B. Petrongolo	2008	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
39	Blau, F. D., L. M. Kahn, N. Boboshko, and M. Comey	2023	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
40	Neal, D	2004	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Fernández‐Val, I., A. Vuuren, F. Vella, and F. Per...

2023

8.0

0.033

1.000

100%

Blanco, G., C. A. Flores, and A. Flores-Lagunes

2013

13.0

0.046

1.000

100%

Chernozhukov, V., S. Lee, and A. M. Rosen

2013

15.0

0.052

1.000

100%

Huber, M. and G. Mellace

2015

17.0

0.065

1.000

100%

Maasoumi, E. and L. Wang

2019

44.0

0.183

0.950

86%

Lee, D. S

2009

34.0

0.157

0.909

75%

Blundell, R., A. Gosling, H. Ichimura, and C. Megh...

2007

9.0

0.039

0.874

100%

Zhang, J. L., D. B. Rubin, and F. Mealli

2008

9.0

0.039

0.874

100%

Bartalotti, O., D. Kédagni, and V. Possebom

2023

10.0

0.033

0.874

100%

Heckman, J. J

1979

5.0

0.026

0.811

100%

Mulligan, C. B. and Y. Rubinstein

2008

7.0

0.026

0.811

100%

Imbens, G. W. and C. F. Manski

2004

8.0

0.026

0.811

100%

Chesher, A

2010

6.0

0.020

0.737

100%

Huber, M., L. Laffers, and G. Mellace

2017

6.0

0.020

0.737

100%

Newey, W. K. and D. McFadden

1994

5.0

0.026

0.737

50%

Zhang, J. L. and D. B. Rubin

2003

3.0

0.013

0.644

100%

Angrist, J. D., G. W. Imbens, and D. B. Rubin

1996

4.0

0.013

0.644

100%

Blau, F. D. and L. M. Kahn

2017

4.0

0.013

0.644

100%

Heckman, J

1974

2.0

0.013

0.511

100%

Manski, C. F

1990

2.0

0.013

0.511

100%

Chen, X. and C. A. Flores

2015

2.5

0.013

0.511

50%

Blau, F. D

1998

4.0

0.013

0.511

100%

Blau, F. D. and A. H. Beller

1988

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Fernández-Val, I., A. van Vuuren, and F. Vella

2021

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Buchinsky, M. and J. Hahn

1995

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Huber, M

2014

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Arellano, M. and S. Bonhomme

2017b

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Arellano, M. and S. Bonhomme

2017a

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Horowitz, J. L. and C. F. Manski

2000

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Imbens, G. W. and J. D. Angrist

1994

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Mellace, G. and R. Rocci

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Huber, M

2012

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Huber, M. and G. Mellace

2014

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Holland, P. W

1986

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Imbens, G. W

2004

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Goldin, C

2014

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Blau, F. D. and L. M. Kahn

2006

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Olivetti, C. and B. Petrongolo

2008

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Blau, F. D., L. M. Kahn, N. Boboshko, and M. Comey

2023

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Neal, D

2004

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.