← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Mining Causality:\\ AI-Assisted Search for Instrumental Variables
Sukjin Han
https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.14202
63
Citation mentions
47
Cited references
10
Sections
9,142
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Imbens, G. W. and J. D. Angrist 1994 3 3 4.0 0.048 0.843 100%
2 Ludwig, J. and S. Mullainathan 2024 3 2 3.0 0.048 0.737 100%
3 Pearl, J. 2000 2 2 3.0 0.032 0.644 100%
4 Heckman, J. J. and E. Vytlacil 2005 2 2 2.0 0.032 0.644 100%
5 Du, T., A. Kanodia, H. Brunborg, K. Vafa, and S. A... 2024 2 2 2.0 0.032 0.644 100%
6 Foster, A. D. and M. R. Rosenzweig 1995 2 2 4.0 0.032 0.644 100%
7 Conley, T. G. and C. R. Udry 2010 2 2 4.0 0.032 0.644 100%
8 Angrist, J. D., K. Graddy, and G. W. Imbens 2000 3 1 6.0 0.048 0.585 100%
9 Jumper, J., R. Evans, A. Pritzel, T. Green, M. Fig... 2021 2 1 2.0 0.032 0.511 100%
10 Olley, G. S. and A. Pakes 1996 2 1 4.0 0.032 0.511 100%
11 Levinsohn, J. and A. Petrin 2003 2 1 4.0 0.032 0.511 100%
12 Ackerberg, D. A., K. Caves, and G. Frazer 2015 2 1 4.0 0.032 0.511 100%
13 Card, D. and A. B. Krueger 1994 2 2 2.5 0.032 0.511 50%
14 Angrist, J. D. and J.-S. Pischke 2010 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
15 Blundell, R. and J. L. Powell 2003 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
16 Hernan, M. A. and J. M. Robins 2006 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
17 Mogstad, M. and A. Torgovitsky 2024 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
18 Stock, J. H. and M. Yogo 2005 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
19 Olea, J. L. M. and C. Pflueger 2013 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
20 Heckman, J. J. 1979 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
21 Manski, C. F. 1993 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
22 Mullainathan, S. and J. Spiess 2017 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
23 Athey, S. and G. W. Imbens 2019 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
24 Carleo, G., I. Cirac, K. Cranmer, L. Daudet, M. Sc... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
25 Mullainathan, S. and A. Rambachan 2024 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
26 Manning, B. S., K. Zhu, and J. J. Horton 2024 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
27 Ban, T., L. Chen, D. Lyu, X. Wang, and H. Chen 2023 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
28 Cohrs, K.-H., G. Varando, E. Diaz, V. Sitokonstant... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
29 Jiralerspong, T., X. Chen, Y. More, V. Shah, and Y... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
30 Le, H. D., X. Xia, and Z. Chen 2024 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
31 Long, S., T. Schuster, and A. Piche 2023 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
32 Takayama, M., T. Okuda, T. Pham, T. Ikenoue, S. Fu... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
33 Wan, G., Y. Wu, M. Hu, Z. Chu, and S. Li 2024 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
34 Wu, T., M. Terry, and C. J. Cai 2022 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
35 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 1999 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
36 Griliches, Z. and J. Mairesse 1995 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
37 Berry, S., J. Levinsohn, and A. Pakes 1995 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
38 Gaviria, A. and S. Raphael 2001 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
39 Bramoulle, Y., H. Djebbari, and B. Fortin 2009 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
40 Angrist, J. D. 2014 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
41 Fithria, F., M. Adlim, S. R. Jannah, and T. Tahlil 2021 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
42 Chernozhukov, V., C. Hansen, N. Kallus, M. Spindle... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
43 Heckman, J. J., H. Ichimura, and P. Todd 1998 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
44 Ghanem, D., P. H. Sant'Anna, and K. Wuthrich 2022 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
45 Rambachan, A. and J. Roth 2023 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
46 Lee, D. S. and T. Lemieux 2010 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
47 Brown, T. B. et al. 2020 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.