Citation Analysis – A Simple and Adaptive Confidence Interval when \\ Nuisance Parameters Satisfy an Inequality

A Simple and Adaptive Confidence Interval when \\ Nuisance Parameters Satisfy an Inequality
Gregory Fletcher Cox
https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.09962

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

7,995

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Ketz, P	2018	6	3	9.0	0.069	1.000	100%
2	Elliott, G., M\"uller, U., and Watson, M	2015	6	2	11.0	0.069	0.874	100%
3	Moon, H. and Schorfheide, F	2009	4	2	5.0	0.046	0.811	100%
4	Fan, Y. and Shi, X	2023	4	2	6.0	0.046	0.811	100%
5	Cavaliere, G., Nielsen, H., Pedersen, R., and Rahb...	2022	3	2	4.0	0.034	0.737	100%
6	Ketz, P. and McCloskey, A	2023	3	2	5.0	0.034	0.737	100%
7	Andrews, D. and Guggenberger, P	2010b	3	2	5.0	0.034	0.737	100%
8	Blattman, C., Jamison, J., and Sheridan, M	2017	2	2	3.0	0.023	0.644	100%
9	Shapiro, J	2021	2	2	3.0	0.023	0.644	100%
10	M\"uller, U. and Norets, A	2016	2	2	3.0	0.023	0.644	100%
11	Francq, C. and Zakoian, J	2009	2	1	2.0	0.023	0.511	100%
12	Pedersen, R	2017	2	1	2.0	0.023	0.511	100%
13	Francq, C. and Thieu, L	2018	2	1	2.0	0.023	0.511	100%
14	Cavaliere, G., Nielsen, H., and Rahbek, A	2017	2	1	2.0	0.023	0.511	100%
15	Cavaliere, G., Perera, I., and Rahbek, A	2024	2	1	2.0	0.023	0.511	100%
16	Ketz, P	2019	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
17	Francq, C. and Zakoian, J	2007	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
18	Francq, C. and Zakoian, J	2019	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
19	Stoel, R., Garre, F., Dolan, C., and van den Witte...	2006	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
20	Andrews, D	1997	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
21	Andrews, D	2002	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
22	Chernoff, H	1954	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
23	Geyer, C	1994	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
24	Andrews, D	1999	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
25	Andrews, D	2001	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
26	Calzolari, G., Fiorentini, G., and Sentana, E	2004	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
27	Frazier, D. and Renault, E	2020	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
28	Pedersen, R. and Rahbek, A	2019	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
29	Silvapulle, M. and Sen, P	2005	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
30	Self, S. and Liang, K	1987	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
31	Kopylev, L. and Sinha, B	2011	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
32	Rosen, A	2008	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
33	Andrews, D. and Soares, G	2010	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
34	Andrews, D. and Barwick, P	2012	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
35	Romano, J., Shaikh, A., and Wolf, M	2014	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
36	Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., and Kato, K	2019	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
37	Cox, G. and Shi, X (self)	2023	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
38	Andrews, I., Roth, J., and Pakes, A	2023	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
39	Fang, Z., Santos, A., Shaikh, A., and Torgovitsky,...	2023	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
40	Andrews, D	2000	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
41	Andrews, D. and Guggenberger, P	2010a	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
42	Li, J	2024a	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
43	Li, J	2024b	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
44	Leeb, H. and P\"otscher, B	2005	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
45	Andrews, D. and Guggenberger, P	2009a	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
46	McCloskey, A	2017	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
47	McCloskey, A	2020	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
48	Muralidharan, K., Romero, M., and W\"uthrich, K	2023	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
49	Armstrong, T. and Koles\'ar, M	2018	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
50	Andrews, I. and Armstrong, T	2017	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
51	Andrews, D. and Guggenberger, P	2009b	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
52	Andrews, D., Cheng, X., and Guggenberger, P	2020	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
53	Evans, D. and Popova, A	2017	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
54	Blattman, C., Fiala, N., and Martinez, S	2014	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
55	Haushofer, J. and Shapiro, J	2016	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
56	Kee, H. L., Nicita, A., and Olarreaga, M	2009	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
57	IWG	2016	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Ketz, P

2018

9.0

0.069

1.000

100%

Elliott, G., M\"uller, U., and Watson, M

2015

11.0

0.069

0.874

100%

Moon, H. and Schorfheide, F

2009

5.0

0.046

0.811

100%

Fan, Y. and Shi, X

2023

6.0

0.046

0.811

100%

Cavaliere, G., Nielsen, H., Pedersen, R., and Rahb...

2022

4.0

0.034

0.737

100%

Ketz, P. and McCloskey, A

2023

5.0

0.034

0.737

100%

Andrews, D. and Guggenberger, P

2010b

5.0

0.034

0.737

100%

Blattman, C., Jamison, J., and Sheridan, M

2017

3.0

0.023

0.644

100%

Shapiro, J

2021

3.0

0.023

0.644

100%

M\"uller, U. and Norets, A

2016

3.0

0.023

0.644

100%

Francq, C. and Zakoian, J

2009

2.0

0.023

0.511

100%

Pedersen, R

2017

2.0

0.023

0.511

100%

Francq, C. and Thieu, L

2018

2.0

0.023

0.511

100%

Cavaliere, G., Nielsen, H., and Rahbek, A

2017

2.0

0.023

0.511

100%

Cavaliere, G., Perera, I., and Rahbek, A

2024

2.0

0.023

0.511

100%

Ketz, P

2019

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Francq, C. and Zakoian, J

2007

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Francq, C. and Zakoian, J

2019

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Stoel, R., Garre, F., Dolan, C., and van den Witte...

2006

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Andrews, D

1997

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Andrews, D

2002

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Chernoff, H

1954

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Geyer, C

1994

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Andrews, D

1999

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Andrews, D

2001

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Calzolari, G., Fiorentini, G., and Sentana, E

2004

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Frazier, D. and Renault, E

2020

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Pedersen, R. and Rahbek, A

2019

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Silvapulle, M. and Sen, P

2005

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Self, S. and Liang, K

1987

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Kopylev, L. and Sinha, B

2011

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Rosen, A

2008

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Andrews, D. and Soares, G

2010

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Andrews, D. and Barwick, P

2012

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Romano, J., Shaikh, A., and Wolf, M

2014

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., and Kato, K

2019

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Cox, G. and Shi, X (self)

2023

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Andrews, I., Roth, J., and Pakes, A

2023

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Fang, Z., Santos, A., Shaikh, A., and Torgovitsky,...

2023

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Andrews, D

2000

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Andrews, D. and Guggenberger, P

2010a

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Li, J

2024a

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Li, J

2024b

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Leeb, H. and P\"otscher, B

2005

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Andrews, D. and Guggenberger, P

2009a

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

McCloskey, A

2017

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

McCloskey, A

2020

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Muralidharan, K., Romero, M., and W\"uthrich, K

2023

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Armstrong, T. and Koles\'ar, M

2018

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Andrews, I. and Armstrong, T

2017

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Andrews, D. and Guggenberger, P

2009b

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Andrews, D., Cheng, X., and Guggenberger, P

2020

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Evans, D. and Popova, A

2017

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Blattman, C., Fiala, N., and Martinez, S

2014

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Haushofer, J. and Shapiro, J

2016

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Kee, H. L., Nicita, A., and Olarreaga, M

2009

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

IWG

2016

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.