← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\bf Heterogeneous Responses to Continuous Treatments: A Cluster-Based Causal Framework
Cerqua Augusto, Di Stefano Roberta, Mattera Raffaele
https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.08773
122
Citation mentions
45
Cited references
10
Sections
11,061
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Fong, Christian and Hazlett, Chad and Imai, Kosuke 2018 5 3 6.5 0.041 1.000 100%
2 Hirano, Keisuke and Imbens, Guido W 2004 26 9 48.5 0.213 1.000 100%
3 Wu, Xiao and Mealli, Fabrizia and Kioumourtzoglou,... 2024 5 5 6.5 0.041 1.000 100%
4 Huling, Jared D and Greifer, Noah and Chen, Guanhu... 2024 16 6 31.0 0.131 1.000 100%
5 Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido 2016 5 3 7.5 0.041 1.000 100%
6 Sugasawa, Shonosuke 2021 6 4 10.0 0.049 1.000 100%
7 Becker, Sascha O and Egger, Peter H and Von Ehrlic... 2012 4 3 8.0 0.033 0.928 100%
8 Wager, Stefan and Athey, Susan 2018 3 3 3.5 0.025 0.843 100%
9 Kennedy, Edward H and Ma, Zongming and McHugh, Mat... 2017 3 2 4.0 0.025 0.737 100%
10 Branson, Zach and Kennedy, Edward H and Balakrishn... 2024 3 2 5.0 0.025 0.737 100%
11 Cerqua, Augusto and Pellegrini, Guido (self) 2018 3 2 6.0 0.025 0.737 100%
12 De Chaisemartin, Cle 2020 2 2 1.5 0.016 0.644 100%
13 Callaway, Brantly and Sant’Anna, Pedro HC 2021 2 2 1.5 0.016 0.644 100%
14 Colangelo, Kyle and Lee, Ying-Ying 2026 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
15 Spa 1979 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
16 Demidenko, Eugene 2018 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
17 Tu 2022 2 2 4.0 0.016 0.644 100%
18 Bia, Michela and Mattei, Alessandra 2012 2 2 4.0 0.016 0.644 100%
19 Bonhomme, Ste 2015 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
20 Rodr\'\i 2015 2 1 4.0 0.016 0.511 100%
21 Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido W 2017 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
22 Imai, Kosuke and Van Dyk, David A 2004 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
23 Zhao, Shandong and van Dyk, David A and Imai, Kosu... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
24 Tu 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
25 Austin, Peter C 2019 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
26 Robins, James M and Hernan, Miguel Angel and Brumb... 2000 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
27 Flores, Carlos A and Flores-Lagunes, Alfonso and G... 2012 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
28 Yiu, Sean and Su, Li 2018 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
29 Cork, Michael and Mork, Daniel and Dominici, Franc... 2025 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
30 Susan Athey and Julie Tibshirani and Stefan Wager 2019 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
31 Rubin, Donald B 1974 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
32 Cox, David Roxbee 1958 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
33 Rubin, Donald B 1980 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
34 Li, Fan and Morgan, Kari Lock and Zaslavsky, Alan ... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
35 Zhang, Yikun and Chen, Yen-Chi 2025 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
36 Schindl, Kyle and Shen, Shuying and Kennedy, Edwar... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
37 Zhang, Yikun and Chen, Yen-Chi and Giessing, Alexa... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
38 Hathaway, Richard J and Bezdek, James C 1993 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
39 Park, Young Woong and Jiang, Yan and Klabjan, Dieg... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
40 Pollard, David 1981 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
41 Pollard, David 1982 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
42 Rand, William M 1971 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
43 Becker, Sascha O and Egger, Peter H and Von Ehrlic... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
44 Cerqua, Augusto and Pellegrini, Guido (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
45 Fingleton, Bernard and Garretsen, Harry and Martin... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.