Citation Analysis

Uniform Estimation and Inference\\ for Nonparametric Partitioning-Based M-Estimators \bigskip
Matias D. Cattaneo, Yingjie Feng, Boris Shigida
https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05715
155
Citation mentions
42
Cited references
25
Sections
3,451
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Belloni, Chernozhukov, Chetverikov and Kato 2015 9 7 15.0 0.058 0.962 89%
2 Shang and Cheng 2013 7 4 11.0 0.045 0.950 86%
3 Cattaneo and Farrell (self) 2013 6 5 9.0 0.039 0.941 83%
4 Cattaneo, Farrell and Feng (self) 2020 20 14 26.5 0.129 0.866 65%
5 Belloni, Chernozhukov, Chetverikov and Fernandez-V... 2019 27 15 33.5 0.174 0.857 63%
6 Chen and Christensen 2015 4 4 5.0 0.026 0.843 75%
7 Kong, Linton and Xia 2013 4 2 6.5 0.026 0.811 100%
8 Chen and Kato 2020 3 3 3.5 0.019 0.737 67%
9 Cattaneo, Crump, Farrell and Feng (self) 2024 4 4 3.5 0.026 0.737 50%
10 Huang 2003 3 3 3.0 0.019 0.737 67%
11 Gyorfi, Kohler, Krzy\.zak and Walk 2002 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.644 100%
12 Yurinskii 1978 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
13 Monrad and Philipp 1991 2 2 1.5 0.013 0.511 50%
14 Zhou, Shen and Wolfe 1998 2 2 1.0 0.013 0.511 50%
15 Chaudhuri 1991 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
16 Kallenberg 2021 8 6 5.5 0.052 0.500 12%
17 van der Vaart and Wellner 1996 16 9 11.0 0.103 0.500 12%
18 Devroye, Gyorfi and Lugosi 2013 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
19 Zhang and Singer 2010 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
20 Eggermont and LaRiccia 2009 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
21 Bhatia 2013 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
22 Dudley 2014 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
23 Chernozhukov, Fernandez-Val and Melly 2013 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
24 Lai and Lee 2005 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
25 McCullagh and Nelder 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
26 Lin and Kulasekera 2007 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
27 Matzkin 2007 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
28 Chernozhukov, Imbens and Newey 2007 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
29 Stone 1982 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
30 Stone 1980 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
31 Hall 1992 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
32 Hall and Kang 2001 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
33 Lepskii 1992 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
34 Birge 2001 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
35 Koenker 2005 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
36 Abadie and Cattaneo (self) 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
37 Cattaneo, Feng and Underwood (self) 2024 4 3 2.0 0.026 0.200 0%
38 Schumaker 2007 5 1 2.5 0.032 0.149 0%
39 Cattaneo, Masini and Underwood (self) 2024 2 2 1.0 0.013 0.139 0%
40 Chernozhukov, Chetverikov and Kato 2014 2 2 1.0 0.013 0.139 0%
41 Aliprantis and Border 2006 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
42 Donald and Hsu 2014 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.