Citation Analysis

\bf \Large Sensitivity Analysis for Dynamic Discrete Choice Models
Chun Pong Lau
https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.16330
93
Citation mentions
45
Cited references
9
Sections
7,925
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 John Rust 1987 14 10 28.0 0.151 1.000 100%
2 Chen, Liang and Choo, Eugene 2023 12 6 21.5 0.129 0.971 92%
3 Igami, Mitsuru 2017 4 4 7.0 0.043 0.928 100%
4 Ossa, Ralph 2014 3 3 5.0 0.032 0.843 100%
5 V. Joseph Hotz and Robert A. Miller 1993 3 3 6.0 0.032 0.843 100%
6 Jørgensen, Thomas H. 2023 4 2 6.5 0.043 0.811 100%
7 Ali Hortaçsu and Joonhwi Joo 2023 3 2 6.0 0.032 0.737 100%
8 Magnac, Thierry and Thesmar, David 2002 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
9 Xinyao Kong and Dube 2022 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
10 Horowitz, Joel and Manski, Charles 1995 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
11 Kline, Patrick and Santos, Andres 2013 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
12 Masten, Matthew A. and Poirier, Alexandre 2020 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
13 Yang, Mu-Jeung 2021 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
14 Victor Aguirregabiria and Allan Collard-Wexler and... 2021 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
15 Arcidiacono, Peter and Miller, Robert A. 2011 2 2 4.0 0.022 0.644 100%
16 Kalouptsidi, Myrto and Scott, Paul T. and Souza-Ro... 2021 2 2 4.0 0.022 0.644 100%
17 Aguirregabiria, Victor and Mira, Pedro 2002 2 2 4.0 0.022 0.644 100%
18 Light, Bar 2021 3 1 1.5 0.032 0.585 100%
19 John Rust 1994 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
20 Christina Dawkins and T.N. Srinivasan and John Wha... 2001 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Frederick, Shane and Loewenstein, George and O'Don... 2002 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Barwick, Panle Jia and Pathak, Parag A. 2015 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
23 Fowlie, Meredith and Reguant, Mar and Ryan, Stephe... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
24 Egesdal, Michael and Lai, Zhenyu and Su, Che-Lin 2015 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
25 Verdier, Valentin and Reeling, Carson 2021 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Andrews, Isaiah and Gentzkow, Matthew and Shapiro,... 2017 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Honor\'e 2020 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
28 Iskrev, Nikolay 2019 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Armstrong, Timothy B. and Kolesár, Michal 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Bonhomme, Stéphane and Weidner, Martin 2022 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Timothy Christensen and Benjamin Connault 2022 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
32 Topkis, Donald M 1998 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Myrto Kalouptsidi and Yuichi Kitamura and Lucas Li... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Su, Che-Lin and Judd, Kenneth L. 2012 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
35 John Rust 1988 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
36 Norets, Andriy 2010 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
37 Bertsekas, D.P. 1999 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
38 Michael P. Keane and Kenneth I. Wolpin 1997 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
39 Collard-Wexler, Allan 2013 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Gregory S. Crawford and Matthew Shum 2005 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
41 Abbring, Jaap H. and Daljord, Oystein 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
42 Arcidiacono, Peter and Miller, Robert A. 2019 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
43 Pakes, Ariel and Ostrovsky, Michael and Berry, Ste... 2007 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
44 Choo, Eugene 2015 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
45 Jan R. Magnus and H. Neudecker 1985 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.