Citation Analysis – \large %Selection and Endogenous Treatment Models with Social Interactions: An Application to the Impact of Exercise on Self-Esteem

\large %Selection and Endogenous Treatment Models with Social Interactions: An Application to the Impact of Exercise on Self-Esteem
Zhongjian Lin, Francis Vella
https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.13971

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

6,183

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Lin, Z. and Y. Hu (self)	2024	4	3	7.0	0.073	0.928	100%
2	Lin, Z. and H. Xu (self)	2017	5	2	8.0	0.091	0.874	100%
3	Lee, L.-f., J. Li, and X. Lin (self)	2014	4	2	6.0	0.073	0.811	100%
4	Heckman, J. J	1979	3	2	4.0	0.055	0.737	100%
5	Xu, H	2018	3	2	5.0	0.055	0.737	100%
6	Brock, W. and S. Durlauf	2001	2	2	3.0	0.036	0.644	100%
7	Roy, A	1951	2	1	2.0	0.036	0.511	100%
8	Fox, K. R	2000a	2	1	4.0	0.036	0.511	100%
9	Heckman, J. J	1974	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
10	Heckman, J. J	1978	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
11	Willis, R. J. and S. Rosen	1979	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
12	Rust, J	1987	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
13	Aguirregabiria, V. and P. Mira	2007	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
14	Manski, C. F	1993	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
15	Lee, L.-f	2007	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
16	Bramoulle, Y., H. Djebbari, and B. Fortin	2009	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
17	Calvo-Armengol, A., E. Patacchini, and Y. Zenou	2009	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
18	Lee, L.-f., X. Liu, and X. Lin (self)	2010	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
19	Goldsmith-Pinkham, P. and G. W. Imbens	2013	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
20	Manski, C. F	2013	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
21	Aronow, P. M. and C. Samii	2017	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
22	Leung, M. P. and P. Loupos	2022	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
23	Manski, C. F	2000	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
24	Tamer, E	2003	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
25	Dai, M. and X. Tang	2015	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
26	Galeotti, A., B. Golub, and S. Goyal	2020	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
27	Sun, Y., W. Zhao, and J. Zhou	2023	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
28	Hotz, V. J. and R. A. Miller	1993	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
29	Campbell, R. N	1984	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
30	Ekeland, E., F. Heian, and K. B. Hagen	2005	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
31	Fox, K. R	2000b	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
32	Tiggemann, M. and S. Williamson	2000	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
33	Spence, J. C., K. R. McGannon, and P. Poon	2005	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
34	Juszkiewicz, A., K. Lachowicz-Tabaczek, and M. Wro...	2020	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
35	Furnham, A., N. Badmin, and I. Sneade	2002	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
36	Strelan, P., S. J. Mehaffey, and M. Tiggemann	2003	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
37	Rosenberg, M	2015	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
38	Vella, F (self)	1992	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Lin, Z. and Y. Hu (self)

2024

7.0

0.073

0.928

100%

Lin, Z. and H. Xu (self)

2017

8.0

0.091

0.874

100%

Lee, L.-f., J. Li, and X. Lin (self)

2014

6.0

0.073

0.811

100%

Heckman, J. J

1979

4.0

0.055

0.737

100%

Xu, H

2018

5.0

0.055

0.737

100%

Brock, W. and S. Durlauf

2001

3.0

0.036

0.644

100%

Roy, A

1951

2.0

0.036

0.511

100%

Fox, K. R

2000a

4.0

0.036

0.511

100%

Heckman, J. J

1974

1.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Heckman, J. J

1978

1.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Willis, R. J. and S. Rosen

1979

1.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Rust, J

1987

1.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Aguirregabiria, V. and P. Mira

2007

1.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Manski, C. F

1993

1.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Lee, L.-f

2007

1.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Bramoulle, Y., H. Djebbari, and B. Fortin

2009

1.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Calvo-Armengol, A., E. Patacchini, and Y. Zenou

2009

1.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Lee, L.-f., X. Liu, and X. Lin (self)

2010

1.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Goldsmith-Pinkham, P. and G. W. Imbens

2013

1.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Manski, C. F

2013

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Aronow, P. M. and C. Samii

2017

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Leung, M. P. and P. Loupos

2022

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Manski, C. F

2000

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Tamer, E

2003

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Dai, M. and X. Tang

2015

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Galeotti, A., B. Golub, and S. Goyal

2020

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Sun, Y., W. Zhao, and J. Zhou

2023

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Hotz, V. J. and R. A. Miller

1993

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Campbell, R. N

1984

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Ekeland, E., F. Heian, and K. B. Hagen

2005

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Fox, K. R

2000b

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Tiggemann, M. and S. Williamson

2000

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Spence, J. C., K. R. McGannon, and P. Poon

2005

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Juszkiewicz, A., K. Lachowicz-Tabaczek, and M. Wro...

2020

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Furnham, A., N. Badmin, and I. Sneade

2002

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Strelan, P., S. J. Mehaffey, and M. Tiggemann

2003

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Rosenberg, M

2015

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Vella, F (self)

1992

2.0

0.018

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.