Citation Analysis

Inference on Consensus Ranking of Distributions
David M. Kaplan
https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.13949
81
Citation mentions
38
Cited references
16
Sections
7,667
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 7 2 9.0 0.086 0.874 100%
2 3 3 6.0 0.037 0.843 100%
3 3 2 5.0 0.037 0.737 100%
4 3 2 5.0 0.037 0.737 100%
5 3 3 4.5 0.037 0.737 67%
6 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
7 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
8 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
9 3 1 3.0 0.037 0.585 100%
10 3 3 3.0 0.037 0.585 33%
11 12 4 9.0 0.148 0.550 17%
12 2 2 1.5 0.025 0.511 50%
13 4 2 3.5 0.049 0.511 25%
14 2 1 4.0 0.025 0.511 100%
15 2 2 2.5 0.025 0.511 50%
16 2 2 2.5 0.025 0.511 50%
17 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
18 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
19 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
20 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
21 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
22 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
23 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
24 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
25 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
26 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
27 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
28 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
29 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
30 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
31 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
32 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
33 4 1 4.0 0.049 0.139 0%
34 2 2 1.0 0.025 0.139 0%
35 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
36 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
37 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
38 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.