Citation Analysis

Continuous difference-in-differences with double/debiased machine learning
Lucas Z. Zhang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10509
124
Citation mentions
44
Cited references
10
Sections
3,288
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Callaway, B., Goodman-Bacon, A., and Sant'Anna, P.... 2024 11 4 17.0 0.089 1.000 100%
2 Chang, N. C 2020 7 4 12.0 0.056 1.000 100%
3 Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Du... 2018 11 5 19.0 0.089 1.000 100%
4 Fan, Q., Hsu, Y. C., Lieli, R. P., and Zhang, Y (self) 2022 6 4 11.0 0.048 1.000 100%
5 Acemoglu, D. and Finkelstein, A 2008 18 7 30.0 0.145 0.962 89%
6 Colangelo, K. and Lee, Y. Y 2025 4 3 7.0 0.032 0.928 100%
7 Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., and Kato, K 2014 3 3 5.0 0.024 0.843 100%
8 Bibaut, A. F. and van der Laan, M. J 2017 3 3 5.0 0.024 0.843 100%
9 Su, L., Ura, T., and Zhang, Y (self) 2019 3 3 5.0 0.024 0.843 100%
10 Abadie, A 2005 4 2 5.0 0.032 0.811 100%
11 Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., and Kato, K 2014 4 2 7.0 0.032 0.811 100%
12 Kennedy, E. H., Ma, Z., McHugh, M. D., and Small, ... 2017 4 2 5.0 0.032 0.811 100%
13 Sant'Anna, P. H. and Zhao, J 2020 3 2 4.0 0.024 0.737 100%
14 Haddad, M. F., Huber, M., and Zhang, L. Z (self) 2024 3 2 6.0 0.024 0.737 100%
15 Hines, O., Dukes, O., Diaz-Ordaz, K., and Vansteel... 2022 3 2 6.0 0.024 0.737 100%
16 Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., and Todd, P. E 1997 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
17 Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., and Todd, P 1998 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
18 Semenova, V. and Chernozhukov, V 2021 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
19 de Chaisemartin, C., D'Haultfoeuille, X., Pasquier... 2022 2 1 2.0 0.016 0.511 100%
20 D'Haultfoeuille, X., Hoderlein, S., and Sasaki, Y 2023 2 1 2.0 0.016 0.511 100%
21 Hettinger, G., Lee, Y., and Mitra, N 2025 2 1 2.0 0.016 0.511 100%
22 Fan, J. and Yao, Q 2003 2 1 4.0 0.016 0.511 100%
23 Li, Q. and Racine, J.S 2007 2 1 4.0 0.016 0.511 100%
24 Zeng, H. S., Danaher, B., and Smith, M. D 2022 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
25 Cook, L. D., Jones, M. E., Logan, T. D., and Ros\'... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
26 Ananat, E., Glasner, B., Hamilton, C., and Parolin... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
27 Roth, J., Sant’Anna, P. H., Bilinski, A., and Poe,... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
28 de Chaisemartin, C. and D'Haultfoeuille, X 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
29 Callaway, B 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
30 Athey, S. and Imbens, G. W 2006 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
31 Kallus, N. and Zhou, A 2018 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
32 Rubin, D. B 1974 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
33 Hong, S. H 2013 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
34 Zimmert, M 2020 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
35 Sant'Anna, P. H. and Xu, Q 2025 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
36 Galvao, A. F. and Wang, L 2015 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
37 Fan, J., Yao, Q., and Tong, H 1996 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
38 Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., Fernández‐Val, I., ... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
39 Cattaneo, M. D. and Jansson, M 2021 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
40 Callaway, B. and Sant'Anna, P. H 2018 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
41 Silverman, B. W 2018 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
42 H\"ardle, W 1990 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
43 van der Vaart, A.W. and Wellner, J.A 1996 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
44 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.