← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

2408.09607
Jinglong Zhao
https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.09607
357
Citation mentions
279
Cited references
11
Sections
3,351
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Wu CF 1981 8 4 15.0 0.022 1.000 100%
2 Lindley DV 1956 3 3 6.0 0.008 0.843 100%
3 Fedorov VV 2013 3 3 6.0 0.008 0.843 100%
4 Pukelsheim F 2006 3 3 6.0 0.008 0.843 100%
5 Silvey S 2013 3 3 6.0 0.008 0.843 100%
6 Titterington D 1975 3 3 6.0 0.008 0.843 100%
7 Rigollet P, Hutter JC 2019 3 3 6.0 0.008 0.843 100%
8 Ding P 2023 4 2 8.0 0.011 0.811 100%
9 Bai Y 2022 4 2 8.0 0.011 0.811 100%
10 Cochran W, Autrey K, Cannon C 1941 3 2 4.0 0.008 0.737 100%
11 Imbens GW, Rubin DB 2015 3 2 6.0 0.008 0.737 100%
12 Bhat N, Farias VF, Moallemi CC, Sinha D 2020 3 2 6.0 0.008 0.737 100%
13 Bojinov I, Shephard N 2019 3 2 6.0 0.008 0.737 100%
14 Chamandy N 2016 2 2 3.0 0.006 0.644 100%
15 Huang S, Wang C, Yuan Y, Zhao J, Zhang J 2023 2 2 3.0 0.006 0.644 100%
16 Tang Y, Huang C, Kastelman D, Bauman J 2020 2 2 3.0 0.006 0.644 100%
17 Bickel PJ, Doksum KA 2015 2 2 3.0 0.006 0.644 100%
18 Casella G, Berger RL 2002 2 2 3.0 0.006 0.644 100%
19 Savage LJ 1951 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
20 Atkinson A, Donev A, Tobias R 2007 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
21 Atkinson AC, Fedorov VV 1975 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
22 Card D, Krueger AB 1993 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
23 Kasy M 2016 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
24 Wager S 2020 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
25 Buhlmann P, van de Geer S 2011 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
26 Wainwright MJ 2019 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
27 Rubin DB 1978 2 2 3.0 0.006 0.644 100%
28 Basse GW, Ding Y, Toulis P 2023 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
29 Bojinov I, Simchi-Levi D, Zhao J 2023 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
30 Zhao J 2023 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
31 Kallus N 2018 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
32 Xiong R, Athey S, Bayati M, Imbens G 2023 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
33 Hu F, Rosenberger WF 2006 2 2 4.0 0.006 0.644 100%
34 Hu Y, Wager S 2022 3 1 6.0 0.008 0.585 100%
35 Shin J, Ramdas A, Rinaldo A 3 1 6.0 0.008 0.585 100%
36 Zhan R, Ren Z, Athey S, Zhou Z 2023 3 1 6.0 0.008 0.585 100%
37 Zhang K, Janson L, Murphy S 2020 3 1 6.0 0.008 0.585 100%
38 Farronato C, MacCormack A, Mehta S 2018 2 1 2.0 0.006 0.511 100%
39 Sibson R 1974 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
40 Manski CF 2013 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
41 Leung MP 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
42 Si N 2023 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
43 Liang T, Recht B 2023 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
44 Glynn PW, Johari R, Rasouli M 2020 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
45 Jia S, Bhattacharya S, Kallus N, Yu CL 2023 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
46 Farias V, Li A, Peng T, Zheng A 2022 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
47 Athey S, Chetty R, Imbens GW, Kang H 2019 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
48 Atkinson AC 1982 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
49 Bowden J, Trippa L 2017 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
50 Dimakopoulou M, Ren Z, Zhou Z 2021 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
51 Hadad V, Hirshberg DA, Zhan R, Wager S, Athey S 2021 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
52 Zhan R, Hadad V, Hirshberg DA, Athey S 2021 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
53 Zhang K, Janson L, Murphy S 2021 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
54 Qin C, Russo D 2024 2 1 4.0 0.006 0.511 100%
55 Landovitz RJ, Donnell D, Clement ME, Hanscom B, Co... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
56 He Q, Gao F, Dukes O, Delany-Moretlwe S, Zhang B 2024 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
57 Maruthi B, Joseph RV 1999 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
58 Mosteller F 1995 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
59 Koning R, Hasan S, Chatterji A 2022 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
60 Chen G, Lu C, Chan T, Qi Z, Zhang D, Jin Y, Yang M 2024 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
61 Farias V, Li H, Peng T, Ren X, Zhang H, Zheng A 2023 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
62 Gupta S, Kohavi R, Tang D, Xu Y, Andersen R, Baksh... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
63 Ye Z, Zhang Z, Zhang D, Zhang H, Zhang RP 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
64 Zhu Z, Cai Z, Zheng L, Si N 2024 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
65 Kohavi R, Deng A, Frasca B, Walker T, Xu Y, Pohlma... 2013 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
66 Tang D, Agarwal A, O'Brien D, Meyer M 2010 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
67 Neyman J, Pearson ES 1933 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
68 Wald A 1949 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
69 Chaloner KM 1982 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
70 Chaloner K, Verdinelli I 1995 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
71 Letham B, Karrer B, Ottoni G, Bakshy E 2019 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
72 Lindley DV 1972 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
73 Hernan MA, Robins JM 2010 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
74 Rosenbaum PR, Rosenbaum P, Briskman 2010 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
75 Pearl J, et al 2000 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
76 Pearl J, Glymour M, Jewell NP 2016 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
77 Peters J, Janzing D, Scholkopf B 2017 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
78 Spirtes P, Glymour C, Scheines R 2001 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
79 Ben-Tal A, El Ghaoui L, Nemirovski A 2009 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
80 Bertsekas DP 1997 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
81 Bertsimas D, Tsitsiklis JN 1997 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
82 Birge JR, Louveaux F 2011 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
83 Boyd SP, Vandenberghe L 2004 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
84 Nocedal J, Wright SJ 1999 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
85 Schrijver A, et al 2003 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
86 Berger JO 2013 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
87 Chen X, Jasin S, Shi C 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
88 Wooldridge JM 2010 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
89 Neyman J 1923 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
90 Holland PW 1986 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
91 Rubin DB 1974 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
92 Athey S, Imbens GW 2017 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
93 Holland PW 1988 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
94 Cox DR 1958 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
95 Rubin D 1980 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
96 Rubin DB 2005 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
97 Abadie A, Athey S, Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM 2020 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
98 Manski CF, Pepper JV 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
99 Wolfowitz J 1952 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
100 Good P 2013 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
101 Bai Y 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
102 Candogan O, Chen C, Niazadeh R 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
103 Ni T, Bojinov I, Zhao J 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
104 Manski CF 2004 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
105 Stoye J 2009 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
106 Tibshirani R 1996 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
107 Smith K 1918 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
108 Goemans MX, Williamson DP 1995 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
109 Allen-Zhu Z, Li Y, Singh A, Wang Y 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
110 Madan V, Singh M, Tantipongpipat U, Xie W 2019 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
111 Meyer RK, Nachtsheim CJ 1995 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
112 Nikolov A 2015 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
113 Nikolov A, Singh M 2016 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
114 Singh M, Xie W 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
115 Singh M, Xie W 2020 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
116 Summa MD, Eisenbrand F, Faenza Y, Moldenhauer C 2014 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
117 Abadie A 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
118 Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J 2010 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
119 Abadie A, Gardeazabal J 2003 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
120 Doudchenko N, Gilinson D, Taylor S, Wernerfelt N 2019 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
121 Doudchenko N, Khosravi K, Pouget-Abadie J, Lahaie ... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
122 Lu Y, Li J, Ying L, Blanchet J 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
123 Abadie A, Zhao J 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
124 Hudgens MG, Halloran ME 2008 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
125 Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ, VanderWeele TJ 2012 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
126 Aronow PM, Samii C 2017 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
127 Athey S, Eckles D, Imbens GW 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
128 Li S, Wager S 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
129 Belloni A, Fang F, Volfovsky A 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
130 Leung MP 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
131 Savje F, Aronow P, Hudgens M 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
132 Yu CL, Airoldi EM, Borgs C, Chayes JT 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
133 Yuan Y, Altenburger K, Kooti F 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
134 Yuan Y, Altenburger KM 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
135 Boyarsky A, Namkoong H, Pouget-Abadie J 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
136 Cortez-Rodriguez M, Eichhorn M, Yu CL 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
137 Han K, Li S, Mao J, Wu H 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
138 Bajari P, Burdick B, Imbens GW, Masoero L, McQueen... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
139 Munro E, Wager S, Xu K 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
140 Munro E 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
141 Wager S, Xu K 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
142 Basse GW, Soufiani HA, Lambert D 2016 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
143 Bright I, Delarue A, Lobel I 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
144 Dhaouadi W, Johari R, Weintraub GY 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
145 Johari R, Li H, Liskovich I, Weintraub GY 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
146 Kuang X, Mendelson G 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
147 Liao L, Kroer C 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
148 Li H, Zhao G, Johari R, Weintraub GY 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
149 Li S, Johari R, Kuang X, Wager S 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
150 Si N, Gultekin S, Blanchet J, Flores A 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
151 Ye Z, Zhang DJ, Zhang H, Zhang R, Chen X, Xu Z 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
152 Goli A, Lambrecht A, Yoganarasimhan H 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
153 Holtz D, Brennan J, Pouget-Abadie J 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
154 Johnson GA, Lewis RA, Nubbemeyer EI 2017 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
155 Zhan R, Han S, Hu Y, Jiang Z 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
156 Kastelman D, Ramesh R 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
157 Chen H, Simchi-Levi D 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
158 Xiong R, Chin A, Taylor SJ 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
159 Prentice RL 1989 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
160 Wen Q, Shi C, Yang Y, Tang N, Zhu H 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
161 Yang J, Eckles D, Dhillon P, Aral S 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
162 Hohnhold H, O'Brien D, Tang D 2015 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
163 Munro E, Jones D, Brennan J, Nelet R, Mirrokni V, ... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
164 Cochran WG, Cox GM 1948 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
165 Cox DR, Reid N 2000 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
166 Rubin DB 2008 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
167 Cytrynbaum M 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
168 Greevy R, Lu B, Silber JH, Rosenbaum P 2004 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
169 Higgins MJ, Savje F, Sekhon JS 2016 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
170 Lu B, Greevy R, Xu X, Beck C 2011 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
171 Tabord-Meehan M 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
172 Deng A, Xu Y, Kohavi R, Walker T 2013 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
173 Jin Y, Ba S 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
174 Wu Y, Zheng Z, Zhang G, Zhang Z, Wang C 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
175 Abadie A, Imbens GW 2012 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
176 Abadie A, Imbens GW 2006 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
177 Bertsimas D, Johnson M, Kallus N 2015 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
178 Dehejia RH, Wahba S 2002 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
179 Diamond A, Sekhon JS 2013 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
180 Hirano K, Imbens GW, Ridder G 2003 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
181 Imai K, King G, Nall C 2009 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
182 Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB 1983 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
183 Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB 1984 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
184 Rosenbaum PR 1989 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
185 Zubizarreta JR 2012 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
186 Alexanderian A, Petra N, Stadler G, Ghattas O 2014 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
187 De Castro Y, Gamboa F, Henrion D, Hess R, Lasserre... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
188 Ruan Y, Yang J, Zhou Y 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
189 Uci\'nski D, Bogacka B 2005 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
190 Ahmadi AA, Parrilo PA 2012 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
191 Helmberg C 2002 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
192 Luo ZQ, Ma WK, So AMC, Ye Y, Zhang S 2010 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
193 Nie J 2014 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
194 Parrilo PA 2003 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
195 Todd MJ 2001 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
196 Vandenberghe L, Boyd S 1996 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
197 Chattopadhyay A, Morris CN, Zubizarreta JR 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
198 Harshaw C, Savje F, Spielman DA, Zhang P 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
199 Li JQ, Rusmevichientong P, Simester D, Tsitsiklis ... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
200 Morris C, et al 1979 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
201 Brown CA, Lilford RJ 2006 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
202 Hemming K, Haines TP, Chilton PJ, Girling AJ, Lilf... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
203 Hussey MA, Hughes JP 2007 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
204 Li F, Turner EL, Preisser JS 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
205 Efron B 1971 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
206 Pocock SJ, Simon R 1975 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
207 Atkinson AC 1999 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
208 Bertsimas D, Korolko N, Weinstein AM 2019 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
209 Kapelner A, Krieger A 2014 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
210 Rosenberger WF, Sverdlov O 2008 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
211 Rosenberger WF, Lachin JM 2015 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
212 Zhao J, Zhou Z 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
213 Murphy SA 2005 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
214 Offer-Westort M, Coppock A, Green DP 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
215 Deshpande Y, Mackey L, Syrgkanis V, Taddy M 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
216 Hirano K, Porter JR 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
217 Nie X, Tian X, Taylor J, Zou J 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
218 Shin J, Ramdas A, Rinaldo A 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
219 Asmussen S, Glynn PW 2007 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
220 Glasserman P 2004 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
221 Ross SM 2013 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
222 Ham DW, Bojinov I, Lindon M, Tingley M 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
223 Ham DW, Lindon M, Tingley M, Bojinov I 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
224 Abbasi-Yadkori Y, Bartlett P, Gabillon V, Malek A,... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
225 Adusumilli K 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
226 Audibert JY, Bubeck S 2010 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
227 Bubeck S, Munos R, Stoltz G 2009 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
228 Chen J, Chen X, Zhang Q, Zhou Y 2017 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
229 Chen X, Gopi S, Mao J, Schneider J 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
230 Chen X, Liu Q, Wang Y 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
231 Kasy M, Sautmann A 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
232 Kato M, Ariu K, Imaizumi M, Uehara M, Nomura M, Qi... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
233 Mannor S, Tsitsiklis JN 2004 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
234 Miao R, Qi Z, Shi C, Lin L 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
235 Naby AD, Farajollahzadeh S, Hu M 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
236 Qin C, Klabjan D, Russo D 2017 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
237 Qin C 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
238 Russo D 2016 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
239 Tang J, Qi Z, Fang E, Shi C 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
240 Xu J, Wu Y, Wang Y, Wang C, Zheng Z 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
241 Wu Y, Zheng Z, Zhang G, Zhang Z, Wang C 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
242 Zhang Z, Zeng Z, Zhan R, Zhang DJ 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
243 Zhou Y, Chen X, Li J 2014 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
244 Antos A, Grover V, Szepesvari C 2010 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
245 Armstrong TB 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
246 Aznag A, Cummings R, Elmachtoub AN 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
247 Blackwell M, Pashley NE, Valentino D 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
248 Carpentier A, Munos R 2011 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
249 Carpentier A, Lazaric A, Ghavamzadeh M, Munos R, A... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
250 Carpentier A, Munos R 2012 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
251 Carpentier A, Munos R, Antos A 2015 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
252 Dai J, Gradu P, Harshaw C 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
253 Deep V, Bassamboo A, Juneja S 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
254 Fontaine X, Perrault P, Valko M, Perchet V 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
255 Grover V 2009 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
256 Hahn J, Hirano K, Karlan D 2011 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
257 Russac Y, Katsimerou C, Bohle D, Cappe O, Garivier... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
258 Wei W, Ma X, Wang J 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
259 Wei W, Ma X, Wang J 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
260 Athey S, Byambadalai U, Hadad V, Krishnamurthy SK,... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
261 Bui L, Johari R, Mannor S 2011 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
262 Drugan MM, Nowe A 2013 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
263 Erraqabi A, Lazaric A, Valko M, Brunskill E, Liu Y... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
264 Krishnamurthy SK, Zhan R, Athey S, Brunskill E 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
265 Simchi-Levi D, Wang C 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
266 Yao J, Brunskill E, Pan W, Murphy S, Doshi-Velez F 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
267 Zhong Z, Cheung WC, Tan VY 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
268 Siegmund D 2013 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
269 Wald A 2004 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
270 Bibaut A, Kallus N, Lindon M 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
271 Cho B, Gan K, Kallus N 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
272 Jamieson KG, Jain L 2018 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
273 Johari R, Pekelis L, Walsh DJ 2015 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
274 Johari R, Koomen P, Pekelis L, Walsh D 2017 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
275 Lindon M, Ham DW, Tingley M, Bojinov I 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
276 Liang B, Bojinov I 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
277 Malenica I, Guo Y, Gan K, Konigorski S 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
278 Ramdas A, Ruf J, Larsson M, Koolen W 2020 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
279 Ramdas A, Grunwald P, Vovk V, Shafer G 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.