← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Revisiting the Many Instruments Problem using Random Matrix Theory
Helmut Farbmacher, Rebecca Groh, Michael Mühlegger, Gabriel Vollert
https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.08580
63
Citation mentions
30
Cited references
14
Sections
3,347
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Chao, J. C. and N. R. Swanson 2005 5 3 7.0 0.079 1.000 100%
2 Hahn, J. and J. Hausman 2002b 5 3 8.0 0.079 1.000 100%
3 Dobriban, E. and S. Wager 2018a 5 4 8.0 0.079 1.000 100%
4 Dobriban, E. and S. Wager 2018b 4 4 8.0 0.063 0.928 100%
5 Hastie, T., A. Montanari, S. Rosset, and R. J. Tib... 2022a 3 3 6.0 0.048 0.843 100%
6 Bai, Z. and J. W. Silverstein 2010 3 3 6.0 0.048 0.843 100%
7 Hansen, C. and D. Kozbur 2014 3 2 4.0 0.048 0.737 100%
8 Hahn, J. and J. Hausman 2002a 3 2 4.0 0.048 0.737 100%
9 Nagar, A. L 1959 3 2 4.0 0.048 0.737 100%
10 Chamberlain, G. and G. Imbens 2004 3 2 4.0 0.048 0.737 100%
11 Donald, S. G. and W. K. Newey 2001 2 2 3.0 0.032 0.644 100%
12 Hastie, T., A. Montanari, S. Rosset, and R. J. Tib... 2022b 2 2 3.0 0.032 0.644 100%
13 Angrist, J. D. and B. Frandsen 2022 2 1 2.0 0.032 0.511 100%
14 Bun, M. J. and F. Windmeijer 2011 2 1 2.0 0.032 0.511 100%
15 Silverstein, J. W 1995 2 1 4.0 0.032 0.511 100%
16 Bekker, P. A 1994 2 1 4.0 0.032 0.511 100%
17 Bound, J., D. A. Jaeger, and R. M. Baker 1995 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
18 Staiger, D. and J. H. Stock 1997 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
19 Stock, J. H. and J. H. Wright 2000 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
20 Belloni, A., D. Chen, V. Chernozhukov, and C. Hans... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
21 Gold, D., J. Lederer, and J. Tao 2020 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
22 Okui, R 2011 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
23 Spiess, J 2017 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
24 Marchenko, V. A. and L. A. Pastur 1967 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
25 Dobriban, E. and Y. Sheng 2020 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
26 Hansen, C., J. Hausman, and W. Newey 2008 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
27 Anatolyev, S 2013 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
28 Kolesar, M., R. Chetty, J. Friedman, E. Glaeser, a... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
29 Anatolyev, S 2019 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
30 Couillet, R. and Z. Liao 2022 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.