← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

%The Structure of Bank Costs and its Implications \\ for the Cost Efficiency Rankings \\ in an Emerging Economy \\ or \\ %
Mikhail Mamonov, Christopher Parmeter, Artem Prokhorov
https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.05688
131
Citation mentions
67
Cited references
7
Sections
10,424
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 6 4 8.0 0.046 1.000 100%
2 7 4 10.0 0.053 1.000 100%
3 6 3 11.0 0.046 1.000 100%
4 6 3 10.0 0.046 1.000 100%
5 Goncharenko, R., Mamonov, M., Ongena, S., Popova, ... (self) 2022 5 4 10.0 0.038 1.000 100%
6 4 2 5.0 0.031 0.811 100%
7 4 2 6.0 0.031 0.811 100%
8 4 2 8.0 0.031 0.811 100%
9 3 2 4.0 0.023 0.737 100%
10 3 2 5.0 0.023 0.737 100%
11 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
12 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
13 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
14 4 1 4.0 0.031 0.644 100%
15 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
16 Berger, A.N., Hasan, I., and Mingming, Z 2010 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
17 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
18 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
19 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
20 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
21 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
22 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
23 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
24 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
25 Restrepo-Tobon, D., and Kumbhakar, S.C 2014a 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
26 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
27 3 1 3.0 0.023 0.585 100%
28 2 1 2.0 0.015 0.511 100%
29 2 1 2.0 0.015 0.511 100%
30 2 1 2.0 0.015 0.511 100%
31 2 1 4.0 0.015 0.511 100%
32 2 1 4.0 0.015 0.511 100%
33 2 1 4.0 0.015 0.511 100%
34 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
35 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
36 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
37 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
38 International Monetary Fund 2015 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
39 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
40 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
41 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
42 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
43 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
44 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
45 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
46 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
47 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
48 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
49 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
50 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
51 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
52 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
53 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
54 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
55 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
56 Restrepo-Tobon, D., and Kumbhakar, S.C 2014b 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
57 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
58 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
59 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
60 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
61 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
62 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
63 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
64 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
65 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
66 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
67 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.