Citation Analysis

Semiparametric Estimation of Individual Coefficients in a Dyadic Link Formation Model Lacking Observable Characteristics
L. Sanna Stephan
https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04552

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

8,672

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Roger W. Klein and Richard H. Spady	1993	5	5	8.0	0.263	0.928	80%
2	Graham, Bryan S	2017	3	1	3.0	0.158	0.585	100%
3	Candelaria, Luis E	2017	2	1	2.0	0.105	0.511	100%
4	Mele, Angelo	2017	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
5	Sheng, Shuyang	2020	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
6	Ridder, Geert and Sheng, Shuyang	2015	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
7	Ridder, Geert and Sheng, Shuyang	2020	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
8	Gao, Wayne Yuan		1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
9	Koen Jochmans	2018	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
10	Dzemski, Andreas	2019	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
11	Toth, Peter	2017	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%
12	Zeleneev, Andrei	2020	1	1	1.0	0.053	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.