Citation Analysis

Distilling interpretable causal trees from causal forests %%%% Cite as %%%% Update your official citation here when published %
Patrick Rehill
https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.01023
87
Citation mentions
41
Cited references
9
Sections
7,794
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 5 3 6.0 0.057 1.000 100%
2 Rudin, Cynthia 2019 6 4 11.0 0.069 1.000 100%
3 Athey, Susan and Tibshirani, Julie and Wager, Stef... 2019 5 4 9.0 0.057 1.000 100%
4 Shiba, Koichiro and Inoue, Kosuke 2024 4 3 6.0 0.046 0.928 100%
5 Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido 2016 4 4 7.0 0.046 0.928 100%
6 Breiman, Leo 2001 4 4 7.0 0.046 0.928 100%
7 Künzel, Sören R. and Sekhon, Jasjeet S. and Bickel... 2019 4 3 7.0 0.046 0.928 100%
8 Wager, Stefan and Athey, Susan 2018 4 4 8.0 0.046 0.928 100%
9 Dao, Tri and Kamath, Govinda M. and Syrgkanis, Vas... 2021 5 2 8.0 0.057 0.874 100%
10 Frosst, Nicholas and Hinton, Geoffrey 2017 3 2 5.0 0.034 0.737 100%
11 Chernozhukov, Victor and Chetverikov, Denis and De... 2018 3 2 6.0 0.034 0.737 100%
12 Nie, Xinkun and Wager, Stefan 2020 3 2 6.0 0.034 0.737 100%
13 Grubinger, Thomas and Zeileis, Achim and Pfeiffer,... 2014 3 2 6.0 0.034 0.737 100%
14 Bénard, Clément and Josse, Julie 2023 2 2 3.0 0.023 0.644 100%
15 Bertsimas, Dimitris and Dunn, Jack 2017 2 1 4.0 0.023 0.511 100%
16 Dorie, Vincent and Hill, Jennifer and Shalit, Uri ... 2019 2 1 4.0 0.023 0.511 100%
17 Wager, Stefan 2018 2 1 4.0 0.023 0.511 100%
18 Green, Jonathan and White, Mark Harmon 2023 2 1 4.0 0.023 0.511 100%
19 Broockman, David and Kalla, Joshua 2016 2 1 4.0 0.023 0.511 100%
20 Rehill, Patrick and Biddle, Nicholas (self) 2023 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Imbens, Guido W. and Rubin, Donald B. 2015 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Holland, Paul W 1986 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
23 Semenova, Vira and Chernozhukov, Victor 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
24 Domingos, Pedro 1997 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
25 Lee, Hong Joo and Baddar, Wissam J. and Kim, Hak G... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Wang, Chong and Lan, Xipeng and Zhang, Yangang 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Breiman, Leo 1996 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
28 Breiman, Leo and Friedman, Jerome H. and Olshen, R... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Demirović, Emir and Lukina, Anna and Hebrard, Emma... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Lipton, Zachary C 2018 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Giannarakis, Georgios and Sitokonstantinou, Vasile... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
32 Rana, Pushpendra and Miller, Daniel C 2019 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Amann, Erwin and Rzepka, Sylvi 2023 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Zhou, Zhuoming and Jian, Bohao and Chen, Xuanyu an... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
35 Zhou, Hui‐min and Zhan, Rong‐jian and Chen, Xuanyu... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
36 Banerjee, Mousumi and Ding, Ying and Noone, Anne-M... 2012 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
37 Pratto, Felicia and Sidanius, Jim and Stallworth, ... 1994 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
38 Kacholia, Suhan and Neuner, Fabian Guy 2022 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
39 Basu, Sumanta and Kumbier, Karl and Brown, James B... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Zhang, Weijia and Li, Jiuyong and Liu, Lin 2022 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
41 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.