← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Leveraging Uniformization and Sparsity for Estimation and Computation of Continuous-Time Dynamic Discrete Choice Games
Jason R. Blevins
https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.14914
72
Citation mentions
44
Cited references
9
Sections
6,186
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Blevins, J. R (self) 2025 8 4 15.0 0.111 1.000 100%
2 Arcidiacono, P., P. Bayer, J. R. Blevins, and P. B... (self) 2016 9 5 14.5 0.125 0.962 89%
3 Rust, J 1987 3 3 5.0 0.042 0.843 100%
4 Sherlock, C 2022 3 2 6.0 0.042 0.737 100%
5 Aguirregabiria, V. and P. Mira 2007 3 2 2.5 0.042 0.644 67%
6 Pesendorfer, M. and P. Schmidt-Dengler 2008 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
7 Hotz, V. J. and R. A. Miller 1993 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
8 Blevins, J. R. and M. Kim (self) 2024 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
9 Billingsley, P 1961 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
10 Jensen, A 1953 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
11 Reibman, A. and K. Trivedi 1988 2 2 4.0 0.028 0.644 100%
12 Doraszelski, U. and K. L. Judd 2012 2 1 2.0 0.028 0.511 100%
13 Bresnahan, T. F. and P. C. Reiss 1991 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
14 Berry, S. T 1992 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
15 Bajari, P., C. L. Benkard, and J. Levin 2007 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
16 Pakes, A., M. Ostrovsky, and S. Berry 2007 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
17 Hotz, V. J., R. A. Miller, S. Sanders, and J. Smit... 1994 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
18 Iskhakov, F., J. Lee, J. Rust, B. Schjerning, and ... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
19 Aguirregabiria, V. and P. Mira 2010 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
20 Karlin, S. and H. M. Taylor 1975 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
21 Tijms, H. C 2003 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
22 Chung, K. L 1967 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
23 Moler, C. and C. V. Loan 1978 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
24 Moler, C. and C. V. Loan 2003 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
25 Grassmann, W 1977a 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
26 Grassmann, W. K 1977b 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
27 van Dijk, N. M., S. P. J. van Brummelen, and R. J.... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
28 de Paula, A 2013 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
29 Borkovsky, R. N., P. B. Ellickson, B. R. Gordon, V... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
30 Aguirregabiria, V., A. Collard-Wexler, and S. P. R... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
31 Otsu, T. and M. Pesendorfer 2023 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
32 Rust, J 2000 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
33 Doraszelski, U. and J. F. Escobar 2010 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
34 Ortega, J. and W. Rheinboldt 1970 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
35 Besanko, D., U. Doraszelski, Y. Kryukov, and M. Sa... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
36 Borkovsky, R. N., U. Doraszelski, and Y. Kryukov 2010 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
37 Iskhakov, F., J. Rust, and B. Schjerning 2016 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
38 Saad, Y. and M. H. Schultz 1986 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
39 Newey, W. K. and D. McFadden 1994 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
40 Goldberg, D 1991 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
41 Fox, B. L. and P. W. Glynn 1988 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
42 Rupp, K., R. Schill, J. Süskind, P. Georg, M. Klev... 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
43 Aguirregabiria, V. and P. Mira 2002 1 1 0.5 0.014 0.087 0%
44 Rust, J 1994 1 1 0.5 0.014 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.