Citation Analysis

Nowcasting R&D Expenditures:\\ \emphA Machine Learning Approach
Atin Aboutorabi, Gaétan de Rassenfosse
https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11765
121
Citation mentions
68
Cited references
11
Sections
5,962
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Woloszko, Nicolas 2020 7 4 13.0 0.058 1.000 100%
2 Woloszko, Nicolas 2023 4 3 8.0 0.033 0.928 100%
3 Mosley, Luke and Eckley, Idris A and Gibberd, Alex 2022 15 2 28.0 0.124 0.874 100%
4 Chow, Gregory C and Lin, An-loh 1971 11 2 21.0 0.091 0.874 100%
5 Daniel Borup and David E. Rapach and Erik Christia... 2023 4 2 7.0 0.033 0.811 100%
6 WIPO 2023 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
7 Lundvall, Bengt-Ake 2010 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
8 Edquist, Charles 2013 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
9 Google News Initiative 2023 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
10 Radhakrishnan, Adityanarayanan and Beaglehole, Dan... 2022 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
11 LeCun, Yann and Bottou, Le 2002 3 1 6.0 0.025 0.585 100%
12 Lundberg, Scott M and Lee, Su-In 2017 3 1 6.0 0.025 0.585 100%
13 OECD 2009 2 1 2.0 0.017 0.511 100%
14 Banbura, Marta and Giannone, Domenico and Reichlin... 2010 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
15 Giannone, Domenico and Reichlin, Lucrezia and Smal... 2008 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
16 Ghysels, Eric and Santa-Clara, Pedro and Valkanov,... 2004 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
17 Foroni, Claudia and Marcellino, Massimiliano and S... 2015 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
18 Guo, Cheng and Berkhahn, Felix 2016 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
19 OECD 2015 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
20 Giannone, Domenico and Lenza, Michele and Primicer... 2021 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
21 Henderson, J. Vernon and Storeygard, Adam and Weil... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
22 Francis X. Diebold and Maximilian Göbel and Philip... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
23 Bollen, Johan and Mao, Huina and Zeng, Xiaojun 2011 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
24 De Caigny, Arno and Coussement, Kristof and De Boc... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
25 Cavallo, Alberto and Rigobon, Roberto 2016 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
26 Yanli Zhao and Guang Yang 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
27 Matin N. Ashtiani and Bijan Raahemi 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
28 Xiaoling Shu and Yiwan Ye 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
29 Romer, Paul M 1990 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
30 Aghion, Philippe and Howitt, Peter W 2008 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
31 Edler, Jakob and Fagerberg, Jan 2017 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
32 European Commission 2020 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
33 Guellec, Dominique and van Pottelsberghe, Bruno 2003 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
34 Gonza 2008 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
35 Tajaddini, Reza and Gholipour, Hassan F 2021 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
36 Sokolov-Mladenovi\'c 2016 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
37 Dai, Zhaoxin and Hu, Yunfeng and Zhao, Guanhua 2017 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
38 Abdullah Erdal Tümer and Aytekin Akkuş 2018 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
39 Preis, Tobias and Moat, Helen Susannah and Stanley... 2013 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
40 Bloom, Nick 2007 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
41 Cheng, Bangwen and He, Rong and Yang, Hongjin and ... 2005 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
42 Evans, Martin 2005 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
43 Choi, Hyunyoung and Varian, Hal 2009 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
44 Choi, Hyunyoung and Varian, Hal 2012 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
45 Wu, Lynn and Brynjolfsson, Erik 2015 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
46 Ferrara, Laurent and Simoni, Anna 2019 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
47 Go 2019 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
48 Clements, Michael P and Galv\ a 2008 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
49 Borup, Daniel and Schu 2022 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
50 Goodfellow, Ian and Bengio, Yoshua and Courville, ... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
51 Belkin, Mikhail and Hsu, Daniel and Ma, Siyuan and... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
52 Belkin, Mikhail 2021 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
53 Masters, Timothy 1993 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
54 Ioffe, Sergey and Szegedy, Christian 2015 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
55 Santurkar, Shibani and Tsipras, Dimitris and Ilyas... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
56 Loshchilov, Ilya and Hutter, Frank 2017 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
57 OECD 2023 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
58 Medeiros, Marcelo C and Pires, Henrique F 2021 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
59 International Monetary Fund 2023 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
60 StatCounter 2024 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
61 StatCounter 2024 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
62 StatCounter 2024 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
63 Sax, Christoph and Steiner, Peter 2013 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
64 Luke Mosley and Kaveh S. Nobari 2022 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
65 Data USA 2023 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
66 de Rassenfosse, Gae (self) 2018 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
67 Mulgan, Geoff and Tucker, Simon and Ali, Rushanara... 2007 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
68 Chesbrough, Henry William 2003 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.