← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

2407.09696
Richard Luger
https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09696
93
Citation mentions
60
Cited references
11
Sections
5,995
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Westfall, P. and S. Young 1993 7 4 13.0 0.075 1.000 100%
2 Romano, J. and M. Wolf 2005 6 4 11.0 0.065 1.000 100%
3 Ledoit, O. and M. Wolf 2004 4 4 7.0 0.043 0.928 100%
4 Lehmann, E. and J. Romano 2005 3 2 5.0 0.032 0.737 100%
5 Randles, R. and D. Wolfe 1979 3 2 6.0 0.032 0.737 100%
6 Dufour, J.-M 2006 3 2 6.0 0.032 0.737 100%
7 Ledoit, O. and M. Wolf 2003 2 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 100%
8 Zhu, L.-X. and G. Neuhaus 2000 2 2 4.0 0.022 0.644 100%
9 Ledoit, O. and M. Wolf 2015 2 2 4.0 0.022 0.644 100%
10 Ramprasad, P 2016 2 2 4.0 0.022 0.644 100%
11 De Nard, G., R. Engle, O. Ledoit, and M. Wolf 2022 3 1 6.0 0.032 0.585 100%
12 El Karoui, N 2008 2 1 2.0 0.022 0.511 100%
13 Ge, Y., S. Dudoit, and T. Speed 2003 2 1 4.0 0.022 0.511 100%
14 Romano, J. and M. Wolf 2007 2 1 4.0 0.022 0.511 100%
15 Scheuch, C., S. Voigt, and P. Weiss 2023 2 1 4.0 0.022 0.511 100%
16 Engle, R., O. Ledoit, and M. Wolf 2019 2 1 4.0 0.022 0.511 100%
17 Kirby, C. and B. Ostdiek 2012 2 1 4.0 0.022 0.511 100%
18 Johnstone, I 2001 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
19 Ledoit, O. and M. Wolf 2012 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
20 Won, J.-H., J. Lim, S.-J. Kim, and B. Rajaratnam 2013 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Abadir, K., W. Distaso, and F. \vZike\vs 2014 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Bickel, P. and E. Levina 2008b 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
23 Wu, W. and M. Pourahmadi 2009 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
24 Bickel, P. and E. Levina 2008a 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
25 Rothman, A., E. Levina, and J. Zhu 2009 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Cai, T. and W. Liu 2011 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Bailey, N., H. Pesaran, and V. Smith 2019 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
28 Romano, J., A. Shaikh, and M. Wolf 2008 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Dwass, M 1957 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Barnard, G 1963 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Birnbaum, Z 1974 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
32 Cont, R 2001 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Lehmann, E. and C. Stein 1949 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Dufour, J.-M 2003 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
35 Goeman, J. and A. Solari 2011 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
36 Schafer, J. and K. Strimmer 2005 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
37 Soper, H. E., A. W. Young, B. M. Cave, A. Lee, and... 1917 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
38 Silvennoinen, A. and T. Ter\"asvirta 2009 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
39 Boudt, K., A. Galanos, S. Payseur, and E. Zivot 2019 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Chib, S., Y. Omori, and M. Asai 2009 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
41 Fang, K.-T., S. Kotz, and K. Ng 1990 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
42 Berk, J 1997 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
43 Chamberlain, G 1983 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
44 Owen, J. and R. Rabinovitch 1983 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
45 Serfling, R 2006 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
46 Cormen, T., C. Leiserson, R. Rivest, and C. Stein 2022 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
47 Westfall, P. and J. Troendle 2008 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
48 Goeman, J. and A. Solari 2010 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
49 Romano, J. and M. Wolf 2016 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
50 Toulis, P. and J. Bean 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
51 Bollerslev, T 1990 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
52 Bretz, F., T. Hothorn, and P. Westfall 2010 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
53 Jagannathan, R. and T. Ma 2003 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
54 DeMiguel, V., L. Garlappi, and R. Uppal 2009 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
55 French, K 2008 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
56 Ledoit, O. and M. Wolf 2011 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
57 Baker, S., N. Bloom, S. Davis, K. Kost, M. Sammon,... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
58 Dufour, J.-M. and L. Khalaf 2002 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
59 Dufour, J.-M 1989 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
60 2 1 1.0 0.022 0.110 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.