Citation Analysis

Comparative analysis of Mixed-Data Sampling (MIDAS) model compared to Lag-Llama model for inflation nowcasting
Adam Bahelka, Harmen de Weerd
https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.08510
63
Citation mentions
31
Cited references
9
Sections
6,618
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Monteforte, Libero and Moretti, Gianluca 2012 9 5 17.0 0.143 1.000 100%
2 Ghysels, Éric and Sinko, Arthur and Valkanov, Ross... 2007 6 4 11.0 0.095 1.000 100%
3 Kashif Rasul and Arjun Ashok and Andrew Robert Wil... 2024 5 4 9.0 0.079 1.000 100%
4 Ghysels, Éric and Santa-Clara, Pedro and Valkanov,... 2004 4 3 7.0 0.063 0.928 100%
5 Knotek, Edward S and Zaman, Saeed 2017 4 3 6.0 0.063 0.928 100%
6 Ghysels, Éric and Santa-Clara, Pedro and Valkanov,... 2005 3 3 5.0 0.048 0.843 100%
7 Kronenberg, Philipp and Mikosch, Heiner and Neuwir... 2023 3 2 4.0 0.048 0.737 100%
8 Rishi Bommasani and Drew A. Hudson and Ehsan Adeli... 2022 2 2 4.0 0.032 0.644 100%
9 Touvron, Hugo and Lavril, Thibaut and Izacard, Gau... 2023 2 2 4.0 0.032 0.644 100%
10 Kim, Jong Hae 2019 2 2 4.0 0.032 0.644 100%
11 Shrestha, Noora 2020 2 2 4.0 0.032 0.644 100%
12 Taylor, John B 1993 2 1 4.0 0.032 0.511 100%
13 Castro, Vitor 2011 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
14 Ang, Andrew and Bekaert, Geert and Wei, Min 2007 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
15 Box, George E. P. and Jenkins, Gwilym M. 1970 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
16 Christopher A. Sims 1980 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
17 Hochreiter, Sepp and Schmidhuber, Jürgen 1997 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
18 Dzmitry Bahdanau and Kyunghyun Cho and Yoshua Beng... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
19 Vaswani, Ashish and Shazeer, Noam and Parmar, Niki... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
20 Siami-Namini, Sima and Tavakoli, Neda and Namin, A... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
21 Parmezan, Antonio Rafael Sabino and Souza, Viniciu... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
22 OpenAI and Josh Achiam and Steven Adler and Sandhi... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
23 European Central Bank 2023 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
24 Blanchard, Olivier 2021 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
25 Stock, James H and Watson, Mark W 1999 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
26 Almon, Shirley 1965 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
27 Student 1908 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
28 Ekstro 2018 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
29 Rudin, Cynthia 2019 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
30 Wexler, Rebecca 2017 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
31 McGough, Michael 2018 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.