← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Finely Stratified Rerandomization Designs
Max Cytrynbaum
https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.03279
140
Citation mentions
52
Cited references
12
Sections
4,727
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Cytrynbaum, M (self) 2024a 6 4 8.5 0.043 1.000 100%
2 Bai, Y., Romano, J. P., and Shaikh, A. M 2021 8 6 12.0 0.057 1.000 100%
3 Cytrynbaum, M (self) 2024b 26 13 47.0 0.186 1.000 100%
4 Bai, Y., Shaikh, A. M., and Tabord-Meehan, M 2024b 10 5 13.0 0.071 1.000 100%
5 Angrist, J. D., Oreopoulos, P., and Williams, T 2013 9 6 16.0 0.064 1.000 100%
6 Wang, X., Wang, T., and Liu, H 2021 5 3 5.5 0.036 1.000 100%
7 Li, X., Ding, P., and Rubin, D. B 2018 4 4 5.5 0.029 0.928 100%
8 Bai, Y 2022 4 3 6.5 0.029 0.928 100%
9 Abadie, A., Imbens, G. W., and Zheng, F 2014 3 3 3.5 0.021 0.843 100%
10 Bai, Y., Jiang, L., Romano, J. P., Shaikh, A. M., ... 2024a 3 3 3.5 0.021 0.843 100%
11 Wang, Y. and Li, X 2022 3 3 4.5 0.021 0.843 100%
12 Ding, P. and Zhao, A 2024 3 2 3.0 0.021 0.737 100%
13 Newey, W. K. and McFadden, D 1994 3 2 6.0 0.021 0.737 100%
14 Armstrong, T 2022 2 2 1.5 0.014 0.644 100%
15 Niehaus, P. and Muralidharan, K 2017 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
16 Graham, B. S 2011 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
17 Liu, H. and Yang, Y 2020 2 2 1.5 0.014 0.644 100%
18 Neyman, J. S 1990 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
19 Liu, Z., Han, T., Rubin, D. B., and Deng, K 2023 2 2 2.5 0.014 0.644 100%
20 Abadie, A. and Imbens, G. W 2008 2 2 2.5 0.014 0.644 100%
21 Aronow, P., Green, D. P., and Lee, D. K. K 2014 2 2 2.5 0.014 0.644 100%
22 Ding, P., Feller, A., and Miratrix, L. W 2019 2 2 2.5 0.014 0.644 100%
23 Abadie, A., Athey, S., Imbens, G. W., and Wooldrid... 2020 2 2 2.5 0.014 0.644 100%
24 Xu, R 2021 2 2 2.5 0.014 0.644 100%
25 Li, Y., Kang, L., and Huang, X 2021 2 1 1.0 0.014 0.511 100%
26 Wainwright, M. J. and Jordan, M. I 2008 2 1 4.0 0.014 0.511 100%
27 Rockafellar, T. R 1996 2 1 4.0 0.014 0.511 100%
28 Cochran, W. G 1977 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
29 Morgan, K. L. and Rubin, D. B 2012 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
30 Wang, B. and Li, F 2024a 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
31 Schindl, K. and Branson, Z 2024 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
32 Fogarty, C. B 2018 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
33 Bugni, F. A., Canay, I. A., and Shaikh, A. M 2018 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
34 Kakehi, H. and Otsu, T 2024 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
35 Imbens, G. and Angrist, J. D 1994 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
36 Ren, J 2023 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
37 van der Vaart, A. W. and Wellner, J. A 1996 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
38 Pollard, D 1984 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
39 Robins, J. M. and Rotnitzky, A 1995 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
40 Wang, Q., Linton, O., and Hardle, W 2004 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
41 Graham, B. S 2012 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
42 Zhao, Q 2019 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
43 Aliprantis, C. D. and Border, K. C 2006 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
44 Gretton, A., Borgwardt, K. M., Rasch, M. J., Schol... 2008 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
45 Robinson, P. M 1988 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
46 Lin, W 2013 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
47 Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Duflo, E., Hans... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
48 Hansen, M. H., Hurwitz, W. N., and Madow, W. G 1953 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
49 Derigs, U 1988 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
50 Wang, Y. and Li, X 2024b 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
51 Tauchen, G 1985 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
52 Cytrynbaum, M (self) 2021 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.