← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Efficient two-sample instrumental variable estimators with change points and near-weak identification
Bertille Antoine, Otilia Boldea, Niccolo Zaccaria
https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.17056
100
Citation mentions
49
Cited references
15
Sections
5,077
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Antoine, B. and O. Boldea (self) 2018 5 3 7.0 0.050 1.000 100%
2 Ramey, V. A. and S. Zubairy 2018 7 3 12.0 0.070 1.000 100%
3 Angrist, J. D. and A. B. Krueger 1992 5 3 9.0 0.050 1.000 100%
4 Inoue, A. and G. Solon 2010 5 3 9.0 0.050 1.000 100%
5 Hall, A. R., S. Han, and O. Boldea (self) 2012 18 10 26.5 0.180 0.941 83%
6 Abbas, S. K 2023 4 4 7.0 0.040 0.928 100%
7 Bai, J. and P. Perron 2003 5 4 5.5 0.050 0.737 40%
8 Magnusson, L. and S. Mavroeidis 2014 2 2 2.0 0.020 0.644 100%
9 Inoue, A., B. Rossi, and Y. Wang 2024a 2 2 3.0 0.020 0.644 100%
10 Alpanda, S., E. Granziera, and S. Zubairy 2021 2 2 3.0 0.020 0.644 100%
11 Monacelli, T 2005 2 2 3.0 0.020 0.644 100%
12 Andrews, D 1993 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
13 Breusch, T., H. Qian, P. Schmidt, and D. Wyhowski 1999 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
14 Bai, J. and P. Perron 1998 2 2 2.5 0.020 0.511 50%
15 Clarida, R., J. Gal\'\i, and M. Gertler 1999 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
16 Stock, J. and M. Watson 2002 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
17 Ahmed, S., A. Levin, and B. Wilson 2004 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
18 Inoue, A., B. Rossi, and Y. Wang 2024b 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
19 Auerbach, A. and Y. Gorodnichenko 2013 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
20 Owyang, M., V. Ramey, and S. Zubairy 2013 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
21 Barnichon, R. and C. Matthes 2018 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
22 Jord\'a, O., M. Schularick, and A. M. Taylor 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
23 Alloza, M 2022 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
24 Jo, Y. and S. Zubairy 2024 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
25 Klepacz, M 2021 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
26 Cloyne, J., O. Jord\'a, and A. M. Taylor 2023 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
27 Mavroeidis, S 2005 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
28 Dufour, J.-M., L. Khalaf, and M. Kichian 2006 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
29 Nason, J. and G. Smith 2008 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
30 Kleibergen, F. and S. Mavroeidis 2009 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
31 Barnichon, R.and Mesters, G 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
32 Stock, J. H. and M. W. Watson 2018 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
33 Blanchard, O. and R. Perotti 2002 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
34 Sanderson, E., M. M. Glymour, M. V. Holmes, H. Kan... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
35 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
36 Ahn, S. and P. Schmidt 1995 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
37 Bonhomme, S. and E. Manresa 2015 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
38 Antoine, B. and E. Renault (self) 2009 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
39 Antoine, B. and E. Renault (self) 2017 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
40 Boldea, O., A. Cornea-Madeira, and A. R. Hall (self) 2019 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
41 Campa, J. M. and L. S. Goldberg 2005 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
42 Taylor, J. B 2000 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
43 Gal\'i, J. and T. Monacelli 2005 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
44 Ditzen, J., Y. Karavias, and J. Westerlund 2021 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
45 Rigobon, R 2003 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
46 Angelini, G., L. Fanelli, and L. Neri 2024 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
47 Angelini, G., G. Cavaliere, and L. Fanelli 2024 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
48 Kleibergen, F. and R. Paap 2006 3 2 1.5 0.030 0.159 0%
49 Wooldridge, J. M. and H. White 1988 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.