Citation Analysis

F-FOMAML: GNN-Enhanced Meta-Learning for Peak Period Demand Forecasting with Proxy Data
Zexing Xu, Linjun Zhang, Sitan Yang, Rasoul Etesami, Hanghang Tong, Huan Zhang, Jiawei Han
https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.16221
67
Citation mentions
53
Cited references
14
Sections
13,257
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Sitan Yang and Malcolm Wolff and Shankar Ramasubra... (self) 2023 4 4 4.0 0.060 0.843 75%
2 Alex Nichol and Joshua Achiam and John Schulman 2018 4 4 4.0 0.060 0.843 75%
3 Chelsea Finn and Pieter Abbeel and Sergey Levine 2017 2 2 1.5 0.030 0.644 100%
4 Li, Zhenguo and Zhou, Fengwei and Chen, Fei and Li... 2017 2 2 2.5 0.030 0.644 100%
5 Zhou, Pan and Zou, Yingtian and Yuan, Xiaotong and... 2020 2 2 2.5 0.030 0.644 100%
6 Vuorio, Risto and Sun, Shao-Hua and Hu, Hexiang an... 2019 2 2 2.5 0.030 0.644 100%
7 Oreshkin, Boris N and Carpov, Dmitri and Chapados,... 2020 3 1 1.5 0.045 0.585 100%
8 Yao, Huaxiu and Wei, Ying and Huang, Junzhou and L... 2019 2 1 1.0 0.030 0.511 100%
9 Wu, Neo and Green, Bradley and Ben, Xue and O'Bani... 2020 2 1 1.0 0.030 0.511 100%
10 Le Guen, Vincent and Thome, Nicolas 2020 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
11 Meng, Yu and Huang, Jiaxin and Zhang, Yu and Han, ... (self) 2022 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
12 Gupta, Shivam and Ramesh, Kiran and Kumar, Anil 2016 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
13 Jean, Neal and Burke, Marshall and Xie, Michael an... 2016 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
14 Qi Zhu and Yidan Xu and Haonan Wang and Chao Zhang... (self) 2020 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
15 Bishop, Jared and Peters, John and Yannikos, York 2014 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
16 Chang, Kevin and Wu, Jingxuan and Yu, Xinyang and ... 2019 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
17 Jean-Baptiste Fiot and Francesco Dinuzzo 2015 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
18 Pan, Sinno Jialin and Yang, Qiang (self) 2009 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
19 Long, Mingsheng and Wang, Jianmin and Ding, Guigua... 2013 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
20 Gong, Boqing and Shi, Yuan and Sha, Fei and Grauma... 2012 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
21 Tzeng, Eric and Hoffman, Judy and Saenko, Kate and... 2017 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
22 Long, Mingsheng and Cao, Yue and Wang, Jianmin and... 2015 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
23 Li, Jing and Zhang, Yan and Yang, Zhenzhen and Wan... (self) 2020 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
24 Wang, Yaqing and Yao, Qin and Tsang, Ivor W 2019 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
25 Ferreira, Kris Johnson and Lee, Bin Hong Alex and ... 2016 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
26 Baardman, Lennart and Levin, Igor and Perakis, Geo... 2017 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
27 Cao, Xinyu and Zhang, Juanjuan (self) 2021 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
28 Ma, Will and Simchi-Levi, David 2022 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
29 Jake Snell and Kevin Swersky and Richard S. Zemel 2017 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
30 Oriol Vinyals and Charles Blundell and Tim Lillicr... 2016 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
31 Sung, Flood and Yang, Yongxin and Zhang, Li and Xi... (self) 2017 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
32 Ilya Sutskever and Oriol Vinyals and Quoc V. Le 2014 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
33 Salinas, David and Flunkert, Valentin and Gasthaus... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
34 Bryan Lim and Sercan \"O 2019 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
35 Wen, Ruofeng and Torkkola, Kari and Narayanaswamy,... 2017 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
36 Carson Eisenach and Yagna Patel and Dhruv Madeka 2020 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
37 Thomas N. Kipf and Max Welling 2017 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
38 Li, Yaguang and Yu, Rose and Shahabi, Cyrus and Li... 2017 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
39 Chao Shang and Jie Chen and Jinbo Bi 2021 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
40 Kipf, Thomas and Fetaya, Ethan and Wang, Kuan-Chie... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.406 100%
41 Ethan Perez and Florian Strub and Harm de Vries an... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
42 Chen, Tianqi and Guestrin, Carlos 2016 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
43 Junyoung Chung and Caglar Gulcehre and KyungHyun C... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
44 Ma, Fenglong and Chitta, Radha and Zhou, Jing and ... (self) 2017 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
45 Lai, Guokun and Chang, Wei-Cheng and Yang, Yiming ... (self) 2018 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
46 Chelsea Finn and Pieter Abbeel and Sergey Levine 2017 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
47 Goodfellow, Ian and Bengio, Yoshua and Courville, ... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
48 Cortes, Corinna and Vapnik, Vladimir 1995 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
49 Breiman, Leo and Friedman, Jerome H and Olshen, Ri... 1984 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
50 Shen, Max and Tang, Christopher S and Wu, Di and Y... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.087 0%
51 Sang Keun Choe and Sanket Vaibhav Mehta and Hwijee... 2023 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.087 0%
52 Kong, Weihao and Somani, Raghav and Kakade, Sham a... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.087 0%
53 Kong, Weihao and Somani, Raghav and Song, Zhao and... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.015 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.