← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Testing for Restricted Stochastic Dominance under Survey Nonresponse with Panel Data: Theory and an Evaluation of Poverty in Australia
Rami V. Tabri, Mathew J. Elias
https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15702
103
Citation mentions
65
Cited references
14
Sections
11,781
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Davidson, R. and J.-Y. Duclos 2013 6 3 10.0 0.058 1.000 100%
2 Fakih, A., P. Makdissi, W. Marrouch, R. V. Tabri, ... (self) 2022 10 7 17.5 0.097 0.966 90%
3 Foster, J. E. and A. F. Shorrocks 1988 4 4 7.0 0.039 0.928 100%
4 Watson, N. and T. R. Fry 2002 4 3 8.0 0.039 0.928 100%
5 Kline, P. and A. Santos 2013 5 4 6.0 0.049 0.843 60%
6 Zhao, P., D. Haziza, and C. Wu 2020 3 2 5.0 0.029 0.737 100%
7 Wu, C. and J. N. K. Rao 2006 3 3 3.5 0.029 0.737 67%
8 Aitchison, J 1962 3 2 5.0 0.029 0.737 100%
9 Manski, C. F 2016 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
10 Bourguignon, F 2018 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
11 Bhattacharya, D 2005 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
12 Godambe, V. and M. E. Thompson 2009 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
13 Deaton, A 1997 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
14 Watson, N. and M. Wooden 2009 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
15 Andrews, D. W. and G. Soares 2010 2 2 2.5 0.019 0.511 50%
16 Wu, C. and W. W. Lu 2016 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
17 McFadden, D 1989 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
18 Abadie, A 2002 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
19 Barrett, G. F. and S. G. Donald 2003 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
20 Linton, O., E. Maasoumi, and Y.-J. Whang 2005 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
21 Linton, O., K. Song, and Y.-J. Whang 2010 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
22 Donald, S. G. and Y.-C. Hsu 2016 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
23 Lok, T. M. and R. V. Tabri (self) 2021 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
24 Blundell, R., A. Gosling, H. Ichimura, and C. Megh... 2007 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
25 Berger, Y. G 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
26 \cSeker, S. D. and S. P. Jenkins 2015 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
27 Chen, W.-H. and J.-Y. Duclos 2011 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
28 Qin, J., B. Zhang, and D. H. Y. Leung 2009 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
29 Abadie, A., S. Athey, G. W. Imbens, and J. M. Wool... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
30 Chen, J. and R. R. Sitter 1999 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
31 Neyman, J 1934 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
32 Davidson, R 2008 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
33 Fuller, W. A 2009 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
34 Hajek, J 1971 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
35 Rubin-Bleuer, S. and I. S. Kratina 2005 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
36 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
37 Wang, J. C 2012 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
38 Atkinson, A. B 1970 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
39 Atkinson, A. B 1987 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
40 Aryal, G. and F. M. Gabrielli 2013 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
41 Harris, T. R. and H. P. Mapp 1986 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
42 Fong, W. M 2010 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
43 Minviel, J. J. and M. Benoit 2022 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
44 Whang, Y.-J 2019 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
45 Andrews, D. W. and X. Shi 2017 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
46 Kaur, A., B. Prakasa Rao, and H. Singh 1994 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
47 Zheng, B 2002 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
48 Bhattacharya, D 2007 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
49 Deville, J.-C. and C.-E. Sarndal 1992 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
50 Imbens, G. W. and T. Lancaster 1994 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
51 Parente, P. M. and R. J. Smith 2017 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
52 Sarndal, C. E. and S. Lundstrom 2005 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
53 Lustig, N 2017 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
54 Raubertas, R. F., C.-I. C. Lee, and E. V. Nordheim 1986 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
55 Wang, Z., L. Peng, and J. K. Kim 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
56 Watson, N. and M. Wooden 2002 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
57 Wilkins, R., E. Vera-Toscano, F. Botha, M. Wooden,... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
58 Watson, N. and M. Wooden 2004 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
59 Taylor, M. F 2010 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
60 Wilkins, R 2001 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
61 Wilkins, R 2002 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
62 Wilkins, R 2003 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
63 Wilkins, R 2004 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
64 Horowitz, J. L. and C. F. Manski 2006 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
65 Hayes, C 2008 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.