← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\bf TITLE HERE
Alessandro Casini, Adam McCloskey
https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15667
130
Citation mentions
51
Cited references
9
Sections
10,478
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Bauer, M. D. and E. T. Swanson 2023 17 5 22.5 0.131 1.000 100%
2 Cieslak, A. and A. Morse and A. Vissing-Jorgensen 2019 5 3 4.5 0.038 1.000 100%
3 Lucca, D. O. and E. Moench 2015 8 5 9.0 0.062 1.000 100%
4 Bauer, M. D. and E. T. Swanson 2023 6 3 9.0 0.046 1.000 100%
5 Nakamura, E. and J. Steinsson 2018 27 8 43.5 0.208 0.975 93%
6 Hu, G. H. and J. Pan and J. Wang and H. Zhu 2022 4 3 5.0 0.031 0.928 100%
7 Cieslak, A. and A. Schrimpf 2019 3 3 3.5 0.023 0.843 100%
8 Bernile, G. and J. Hu and Y. Tang 2016 4 2 3.5 0.031 0.811 100%
9 Trapani, L. 2016 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
10 Rigobon, R. and B. Sack 2004 2 2 2.5 0.015 0.644 100%
11 G\"u 2005 4 1 8.0 0.031 0.644 100%
12 Cieslak, A. and M. McMahon 2024 2 2 2.5 0.015 0.644 100%
13 Kuttner, K. N. 2001 3 1 6.0 0.023 0.585 100%
14 Rambachan, A. and N. Shephard 2021 3 1 6.0 0.023 0.585 100%
15 Caballero, R. J. and A. Simsek 2022 2 1 4.0 0.015 0.511 100%
16 K\"a 2021 2 1 4.0 0.015 0.511 100%
17 Guidolin, M. and E. La Ferrara 2007 2 1 4.0 0.015 0.511 100%
18 Nakamura, E. and J. Steinsson 2018 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
19 Heckman, J. J. and E. Vytlacil 2001 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
20 Ai, H. and R. Bansal 2018 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
21 Cochrane, J. H. and M. Piazzesi 2002 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
22 Cook, T. and T. Hahn 1989 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
23 Caballero, R. J. and A. Simsek 2023 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
24 Hansen, S. and M. McMahon and A. Prat 2018 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
25 Hanson, S. G. and J. C. Stein 2015 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
26 Jaroci\'n 2020 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
27 Michelacci, C. and L. Paciello 2020 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
28 Neuhierl, A. and M. Weber 2019 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
29 Swanson, E. T. 2021 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
30 Rigobon, R. and B. Sack 2003 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
31 Faust, J. and J. H. Rogers and S.-Y. B. Wang and J... 2007 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
32 G\"u 2020 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
33 K\"a 2025 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
34 Acemoglu, D. and T. A. Hassan and A. Tahoun 2018 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
35 Dube, A. and E. Kaplan and S. Naidu 2011 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
36 Garred, J. and L. Stickland and N. Warrinnier 2023 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
37 Plagborg-M\o 2019 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
38 Imbens, G. W. and J. D. Angrist 1994 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
39 Bandi, F. M. and T. H. Nguyen 2003 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
40 Rubin, D. 1974 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
41 Angrist, J. D. and G. M. Kuersteiner 2011 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
42 Lewis, D. J. 2022 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
43 Rigobon, R. 2003 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
44 G\"u 2013 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
45 Cieslak, A. 2018 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
46 Miranda-Agrippino, S. and R. Ricco 2021 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
47 Bianchi, F. and T. Kind and H. Kung 2020 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
48 Campbell, J. R. and C. L. Evans and J. D. M. Fishe... 2012 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
49 Romer, C. D. and D. H. Romer 2000 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
50 Li, J. and V. Todorov and G. Tauchen 2017 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
51 Armstrong, T. B. and M. Koles\'a 2021 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.