Citation Analysis

\bf MIDAS-QR with 2-Dimensional Structure
Tibor Szendrei, Arnab Bhattacharjee, Mark E. Schaffer
https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15157

124

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

9,659

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	16	6	24.0	0.129	1.000	100%
2	6	4	10.0	0.048	1.000	100%
3	6	4	10.0	0.048	1.000	100%
4	19	7	32.0	0.153	1.000	100%
5	6	4	10.0	0.048	1.000	100%
6	6	3	8.0	0.048	1.000	100%
7	9	3	15.0	0.073	1.000	100%
8	4	3	6.0	0.032	0.928	100%
9	4	3	6.0	0.032	0.928	100%
10	4	3	8.0	0.032	0.928	100%
11	4	4	6.5	0.032	0.843	75%
12	2	2	4.0	0.016	0.644	100%
13	2	2	4.0	0.016	0.644	100%
14	2	2	4.0	0.016	0.644	100%
15	2	2	4.0	0.016	0.644	100%
16	2	2	4.0	0.016	0.644	100%
17	2	2	4.0	0.016	0.644	100%
18	2	2	4.0	0.016	0.644	100%
19	2	2	4.0	0.016	0.644	100%
20	2	2	4.0	0.016	0.644	100%
21	2	1	2.0	0.016	0.511	100%
22	2	1	2.0	0.016	0.511	100%
23	2	1	2.0	0.016	0.511	100%
24	2	1	2.0	0.016	0.511	100%
25	2	1	2.0	0.016	0.511	100%
26	2	1	2.0	0.016	0.511	100%
27	2	1	2.0	0.016	0.511	100%
28	2	1	2.0	0.016	0.511	100%
29	2	1	4.0	0.016	0.511	100%
30	2	1	2.0	0.016	0.511	100%
31	2	1	2.0	0.016	0.511	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.