Citation Analysis – Randomization Inference: Theory and Applications

Randomization Inference: Theory and Applications
David M. Ritzwoller, Joseph P. Romano, Azeem M. Shaikh
https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09521

180

Citation mentions

138

Cited references

Sections

12,702

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Erich. L. Lehmann and Joseph P. Romano (self)	2022	8	6	15.0	0.044	1.000	100%
2	Ivan A. Canay and Joseph P. Romano and Azeem M. Sh... (self)	2017	6	2	12.0	0.033	0.874	100%
3	W. Hoeffding	1952	3	3	5.0	0.017	0.843	100%
4	Thomas B. Berrett and Yi Wang and Rina Foygel Barb...	2020	3	3	5.0	0.017	0.843	100%
5	EunYi Chung and Joseph P. Romano (self)	2013	3	3	6.0	0.017	0.843	100%
6	Kim, Ilmun and Balakrishnan, Sivaraman and Wasserm...	2022	3	2	4.0	0.017	0.737	100%
7	Bai, Yuehao and Romano, Joseph P and Shaikh, Azeem... (self)	2022	9	1	18.0	0.050	0.693	100%
8	Erich L Lehmann	1949	2	2	3.0	0.011	0.644	100%
9	EunYi Chung and Joseph P. Romano (self)	2016	2	2	3.0	0.011	0.644	100%
10	EunYi Chung and Joseph Romano (self)	2016	2	2	4.0	0.011	0.644	100%
11	Cyrus J. DiCiccio and Joseph P. Romano (self)	2017	2	2	4.0	0.011	0.644	100%
12	Ivan A Canay and Vishal Kamat	2018	2	2	4.0	0.011	0.644	100%
13	Joshua B. Miller and Adam Sanjurjo	2018	3	1	6.0	0.017	0.585	100%
14	David M Ritzwoller and Joseph P Romano (self)	2022	3	1	6.0	0.017	0.585	100%
15	Ronald A Fisher	1935	2	1	2.0	0.011	0.511	100%
16	Federico A. Bugni and Ivan A. Canay and Azeem M. S... (self)	2019	2	1	4.0	0.011	0.511	100%
17	Jason Wu and Peng Ding	2021	2	1	4.0	0.011	0.511	100%
18	Yuehao Bai and Azeem Shaikh and Max Tabord-Meehan (self)	2024	2	1	4.0	0.011	0.511	100%
19	D. Freedman and D. Lane	1980	2	1	4.0	0.011	0.511	100%
20	Box, Joan Fisher	1978	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
21	Herbert A David	2008	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
22	David Salsburg	2001	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
23	E. J. G. Pitman	1937	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
24	E. J. G. Pitman	1937	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
25	E. J. G. Pitman	1938	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
26	E. L. Lehmann and C. Stein	1949	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
27	Eugene Edgington	1995	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
28	Fortunato Pesarin	2001	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
29	Phillip Good	2005	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
30	Aldo Solari and Luigi Salmaso and Fortunato Pesari...	2009	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
31	Fortunato Pesarin and Luigi Salmaso	2010	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
32	Luigi Salmaso and Rosa Arboretti and Livio Corain ...	2011	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
33	Kenneth J. Berry and Janis E. Johnston and Paul W....	2019	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
34	Peter E. Kennedy	1995	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
35	Albers, Willem and Bickel, Peter J and van Zwet, W...	1976	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
36	Bickel, Peter J and Van Zwet, WR	2011	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
37	Joseph P. Romano (self)	1989	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
38	Berrett, Thomas B and Kontoyiannis, Ioannis and Sa...	2021	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
39	Dobriban, Edgar	2022	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
40	U M Okeh	2009	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
41	Alwyn Young	2019	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
42	Maris, Eric and Oostenveld, Robert	2007	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
43	Blackford, Jennifer Urbano and Salomon, Ronald M a...	2009	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
44	Stranger, Barbara E and Nica, Alexandra C and Forr...	2007	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
45	Peter Ganong and Simon Jäger	2018	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
46	Rambachan, Ashesh and Roth, Jonathan	2020	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
47	EunYi Chung and Mauricio Olivares	2021	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
48	Kirill Borusyak and Peter Hull	2023	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
49	Gary Doran and Krikamol Muandet and Kun Zhang and ...	2014	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
50	Rajen D. Shah and Jonas Peters	2020	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
51	Ilmun Kim and Matey Neykov and Sivaraman Balakrish...	2023	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
52	Yao Zhang and Qingyuan Zhao	2023	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
53	Lan Wang and Bo Peng and Runze Li	2015	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
54	Rui Wang and Xingzhong Xu	2019	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
55	Yuan Huang and Changcheng Li and Runze Li and Song...	2022	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
56	Munmun Biswas and Anil K. Ghosh	2014	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
57	Marta Cousido-Rocha and Jacobo de U\ n	2019	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
58	Hemerik, Jesse and Goeman, Jelle	2018	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
59	Aaditya Ramdas and Rina Foygel Barber and Emmanuel...	2023	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
60	Hartigan, John A	1969	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
61	Wu, Chien-Fu Jeff	1986	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
62	Liu, Regina Y	1988	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
63	Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel	1971	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
64	Thomas Gilovich and Robert Vallone and Amos Tversk...	1985	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
65	Thaler, Richard H and Sunstein, Cass R	2009	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
66	Barberis, Nicholas and Thaler, Richard	2003	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
67	Nickell, Stephen	1981	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
68	Marinho Bertanha and Eunyi Chung	2023	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
69	Joseph P. Romano (self)	1990	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
70	Mosteller, Frederick	1948	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
71	John W. Tukey	1991	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
72	Yadlowsky, Steve and Fleming, Scott and Shah, Niga...	2021	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
73	Ritzwoller, David M and Syrgkanis, Vasilis (self)	2024	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
74	Janssen, Arnold	1997	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
75	S. Holm	1979	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
76	Yoav Benjamini and Daniel Yekutieli	2001	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
77	Romano, Joseph P and Shaikh, Azeem and Wolf, Micha... (self)	2011	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
78	Charness, G. and Gneezy, U.	2009	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
79	Peter H. Westfall and S. Stanley Young	1993	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
80	J. Romano and M. Wolf (self)	2005	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
81	Hemerik, Jesse and Solari, Aldo and Goeman, Jelle ...	2019	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
82	Vesely, Anna and Finos, Livio and Goeman, Jelle J	2023	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
83	Basse, Guillaume W and Feller, Avi and Toulis, Pan...	2019	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
84	Puelz, David and Basse, Guillaume and Feller, Avi ...	2022	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
85	Athey, Susan and Eckles, Dean and Imbens, Guido W	2018	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
86	Xinran Li and Peng Ding and Qian Lin and Dawei Yan...	2019	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
87	Hui Xu and Guillaume Basse	2021	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
88	Basse, Guillaume and Ding, Peng and Feller, Avi an...	2024	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
89	Rosenbaum, Paul R	1984	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
90	Candes, Emmanuel and Fan, Yingying and Janson, Luc...	2018	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
91	EunYi Chung	2017	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
92	Bugni, Federico A and Canay, Ivan A and Shaikh, Az... (self)	2018	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
93	Anqi Zhao and Peng Ding	2021	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
94	James Heckman and Rodrigo Pinto and Azeem M. Shaik... (self)	2024	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
95	Max Cytrynbaum	2023	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
96	Ding, Peng	2017	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
97	Imbens, Guido W and Rubin, Donald B	2015	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
98	Abadie, Alberto and Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido...	2020	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
99	Bai, Yuehao and Liu, Jizhou and Tabord-Meehan, Max	2024	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
100	Hartigan, JA	1970	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
101	Theil, Henri	1950	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
102	Brown, George W and Mood, Alexander M	1951	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
103	Daniels, HE	1954	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
104	D'Haultfoe	2024	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
105	Hemerik, Jesse and Goeman, Jelle J and Finos, Livi...	2020	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
106	Lihua Lei and Peter J Bickel	2021	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
107	Anderson, Marti J and Robinson, John	2001	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
108	Ter Braak, Cajo JF	1992	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
109	Kennedy, Peter E and Cade, Brain S	1996	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
110	Guo, Wenxuan and Toulis, Panos	2023	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
111	Alwyn Young	2023	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
112	Alwyn Young	2024	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
113	Guillaume A. Pouliot	2024	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
114	Eugene F. Fama	1970	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
115	I. A. Ibragimov	1962	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
116	Joseph P. Romano and Marius A. Tirlea (self)	2022	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
117	Romano, Joseph P and Tirlea, Marius A (self)	2024	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
118	Joseph P. Romano and Marius A. Tirlea (self)	2024	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
119	Vladimir Vovk and Alexander Gammerman and Glenn Sh...	2005	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
120	Jing Lei and Max G’Sell and Alessandro Rinaldo and...	2018	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
121	Lei, Lihua and Cande	2021	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
122	Rina Foygel Barber and Emmanuel J Candès and Aadit...	2021	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
123	Barber, Rina Foygel and Candes, Emmanuel J and Ram...	2021	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
124	Rina Foygel Barber and Emmanuel J. Candès and Aadi...	2023	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
125	Cattaneo, Matias D and Feng, Yingjie and Titiunik,...	2021	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
126	Victor Chernozhukov and Kaspar Wüthrich and Yinchu...	2021	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
127	Victor Chernozhukov and Kaspar Wüthrich and Yinchu...	2021	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
128	Alberto Abadie and Alexis Diamond and Jens Hainmue...	2010	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
129	Lihua Lei and Timothy Sudijono	2024	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
130	Anastasios N. Angelopoulos and Stephen Bates	2023	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
131	Ritzwoller, David M and Romano, Joseph P (self)	2023	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
132	Andrews, Isaiah and Fudenberg, Drew and Lei, Lihua...	2022	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
133	Matias D. Cattaneo and Brigham R. Frandsen and Roc...	2015	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
134	Cai, Yong and Canay, Ivan A and Kim, Deborah and S... (self)	2023	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
135	Ibragimov, Rustam and Mu	2010	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
136	Bakirov, Nail K and Szekely, Gabor J	2006	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
137	Cameron, A Colin and Gelbach, Jonah B and Miller, ...	2008	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
138	Ivan A. Canay and Andres Santos and Azeem M. Shaik... (self)	2021	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Erich. L. Lehmann and Joseph P. Romano (self)

2022

15.0

0.044

1.000

100%

Ivan A. Canay and Joseph P. Romano and Azeem M. Sh... (self)

2017

12.0

0.033

0.874

100%

W. Hoeffding

1952

5.0

0.017

0.843

100%

Thomas B. Berrett and Yi Wang and Rina Foygel Barb...

2020

5.0

0.017

0.843

100%

EunYi Chung and Joseph P. Romano (self)

2013

6.0

0.017

0.843

100%

Kim, Ilmun and Balakrishnan, Sivaraman and Wasserm...

2022

4.0

0.017

0.737

100%

Bai, Yuehao and Romano, Joseph P and Shaikh, Azeem... (self)

2022

18.0

0.050

0.693

100%

Erich L Lehmann

1949

3.0

0.011

0.644

100%

EunYi Chung and Joseph P. Romano (self)

2016

3.0

0.011

0.644

100%

EunYi Chung and Joseph Romano (self)

2016

4.0

0.011

0.644

100%

Cyrus J. DiCiccio and Joseph P. Romano (self)

2017

4.0

0.011

0.644

100%

Ivan A Canay and Vishal Kamat

2018

4.0

0.011

0.644

100%

Joshua B. Miller and Adam Sanjurjo

2018

6.0

0.017

0.585

100%

David M Ritzwoller and Joseph P Romano (self)

2022

6.0

0.017

0.585

100%

Ronald A Fisher

1935

2.0

0.011

0.511

100%

Federico A. Bugni and Ivan A. Canay and Azeem M. S... (self)

2019

4.0

0.011

0.511

100%

Jason Wu and Peng Ding

2021

4.0

0.011

0.511

100%

Yuehao Bai and Azeem Shaikh and Max Tabord-Meehan (self)

2024

4.0

0.011

0.511

100%

D. Freedman and D. Lane

1980

4.0

0.011

0.511

100%

Box, Joan Fisher

1978

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Herbert A David

2008

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

David Salsburg

2001

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

E. J. G. Pitman

1937

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

E. J. G. Pitman

1937

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

E. J. G. Pitman

1938

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

E. L. Lehmann and C. Stein

1949

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Eugene Edgington

1995

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Fortunato Pesarin

2001

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Phillip Good

2005

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Aldo Solari and Luigi Salmaso and Fortunato Pesari...

2009

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Fortunato Pesarin and Luigi Salmaso

2010

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Luigi Salmaso and Rosa Arboretti and Livio Corain ...

2011

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Kenneth J. Berry and Janis E. Johnston and Paul W....

2019

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Peter E. Kennedy

1995

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Albers, Willem and Bickel, Peter J and van Zwet, W...

1976

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Bickel, Peter J and Van Zwet, WR

2011

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Joseph P. Romano (self)

1989

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Berrett, Thomas B and Kontoyiannis, Ioannis and Sa...

2021

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Dobriban, Edgar

2022

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

U M Okeh

2009

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Alwyn Young

2019

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Maris, Eric and Oostenveld, Robert

2007

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Blackford, Jennifer Urbano and Salomon, Ronald M a...

2009

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Stranger, Barbara E and Nica, Alexandra C and Forr...

2007

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Peter Ganong and Simon Jäger

2018

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Rambachan, Ashesh and Roth, Jonathan

2020

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

EunYi Chung and Mauricio Olivares

2021

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Kirill Borusyak and Peter Hull

2023

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Gary Doran and Krikamol Muandet and Kun Zhang and ...

2014

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Rajen D. Shah and Jonas Peters

2020

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Ilmun Kim and Matey Neykov and Sivaraman Balakrish...

2023

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Yao Zhang and Qingyuan Zhao

2023

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Lan Wang and Bo Peng and Runze Li

2015

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Rui Wang and Xingzhong Xu

2019

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Yuan Huang and Changcheng Li and Runze Li and Song...

2022

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Munmun Biswas and Anil K. Ghosh

2014

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Marta Cousido-Rocha and Jacobo de U\ n

2019

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Hemerik, Jesse and Goeman, Jelle

2018

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Aaditya Ramdas and Rina Foygel Barber and Emmanuel...

2023

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Hartigan, John A

1969

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Wu, Chien-Fu Jeff

1986

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Liu, Regina Y

1988

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel

1971

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Thomas Gilovich and Robert Vallone and Amos Tversk...

1985

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Thaler, Richard H and Sunstein, Cass R

2009

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Barberis, Nicholas and Thaler, Richard

2003

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Nickell, Stephen

1981

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Marinho Bertanha and Eunyi Chung

2023

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Joseph P. Romano (self)

1990

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Mosteller, Frederick

1948

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

John W. Tukey

1991

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Yadlowsky, Steve and Fleming, Scott and Shah, Niga...

2021

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Ritzwoller, David M and Syrgkanis, Vasilis (self)

2024

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Janssen, Arnold

1997

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

S. Holm

1979

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Yoav Benjamini and Daniel Yekutieli

2001

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Romano, Joseph P and Shaikh, Azeem and Wolf, Micha... (self)

2011

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Charness, G. and Gneezy, U.

2009

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Peter H. Westfall and S. Stanley Young

1993

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

J. Romano and M. Wolf (self)

2005

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Hemerik, Jesse and Solari, Aldo and Goeman, Jelle ...

2019

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Vesely, Anna and Finos, Livio and Goeman, Jelle J

2023

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Basse, Guillaume W and Feller, Avi and Toulis, Pan...

2019

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Puelz, David and Basse, Guillaume and Feller, Avi ...

2022

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Athey, Susan and Eckles, Dean and Imbens, Guido W

2018

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Xinran Li and Peng Ding and Qian Lin and Dawei Yan...

2019

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Hui Xu and Guillaume Basse

2021

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Basse, Guillaume and Ding, Peng and Feller, Avi an...

2024

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Rosenbaum, Paul R

1984

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Candes, Emmanuel and Fan, Yingying and Janson, Luc...

2018

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

EunYi Chung

2017

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Bugni, Federico A and Canay, Ivan A and Shaikh, Az... (self)

2018

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Anqi Zhao and Peng Ding

2021

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

James Heckman and Rodrigo Pinto and Azeem M. Shaik... (self)

2024

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Max Cytrynbaum

2023

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Ding, Peng

2017

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Imbens, Guido W and Rubin, Donald B

2015

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Abadie, Alberto and Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido...

2020

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Bai, Yuehao and Liu, Jizhou and Tabord-Meehan, Max

2024

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

100

Hartigan, JA

1970

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

101

Theil, Henri

1950

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

102

Brown, George W and Mood, Alexander M

1951

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

103

Daniels, HE

1954

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

104

D'Haultfoe

2024

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

105

Hemerik, Jesse and Goeman, Jelle J and Finos, Livi...

2020

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

106

Lihua Lei and Peter J Bickel

2021

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

107

Anderson, Marti J and Robinson, John

2001

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

108

Ter Braak, Cajo JF

1992

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

109

Kennedy, Peter E and Cade, Brain S

1996

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

110

Guo, Wenxuan and Toulis, Panos

2023

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

111

Alwyn Young

2023

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

112

Alwyn Young

2024

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

113

Guillaume A. Pouliot

2024

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

114

Eugene F. Fama

1970

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

115

I. A. Ibragimov

1962

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

116

Joseph P. Romano and Marius A. Tirlea (self)

2022

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

117

Romano, Joseph P and Tirlea, Marius A (self)

2024

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

118

Joseph P. Romano and Marius A. Tirlea (self)

2024

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

119

Vladimir Vovk and Alexander Gammerman and Glenn Sh...

2005

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

120

Jing Lei and Max G’Sell and Alessandro Rinaldo and...

2018

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

121

Lei, Lihua and Cande

2021

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

122

Rina Foygel Barber and Emmanuel J Candès and Aadit...

2021

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

123

Barber, Rina Foygel and Candes, Emmanuel J and Ram...

2021

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

124

Rina Foygel Barber and Emmanuel J. Candès and Aadi...

2023

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

125

Cattaneo, Matias D and Feng, Yingjie and Titiunik,...

2021

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

126

Victor Chernozhukov and Kaspar Wüthrich and Yinchu...

2021

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

127

Victor Chernozhukov and Kaspar Wüthrich and Yinchu...

2021

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

128

Alberto Abadie and Alexis Diamond and Jens Hainmue...

2010

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

129

Lihua Lei and Timothy Sudijono

2024

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

130

Anastasios N. Angelopoulos and Stephen Bates

2023

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

131

Ritzwoller, David M and Romano, Joseph P (self)

2023

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

132

Andrews, Isaiah and Fudenberg, Drew and Lei, Lihua...

2022

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

133

Matias D. Cattaneo and Brigham R. Frandsen and Roc...

2015

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

134

Cai, Yong and Canay, Ivan A and Kim, Deborah and S... (self)

2023

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

135

Ibragimov, Rustam and Mu

2010

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

136

Bakirov, Nail K and Szekely, Gabor J

2006

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

137

Cameron, A Colin and Gelbach, Jonah B and Miller, ...

2008

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

138

Ivan A. Canay and Andres Santos and Azeem M. Shaik... (self)

2021

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.