Citation Analysis – Did Harold Zuercher Have Time-Separable Preferences?

Did Harold Zuercher Have Time-Separable Preferences?
Jay Lu, Yao Luo, Kota Saito, Yi Xin
https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07809

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

7,823

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Rust, John	1987	12	8	19.0	0.182	0.971	92%
2	Larry G. Epstein and Stanley E. Zin	1989	5	2	8.0	0.076	0.874	100%
3	Gowrisankaran, Gautam and Rysman, Marc	2012	2	2	2.0	0.030	0.644	100%
4	Kreps, David M and Porteus, Evan L	1978	2	2	3.0	0.030	0.644	100%
5	Hotz, V Joseph and Miller, Robert A	1993	3	1	6.0	0.045	0.585	100%
6	Bansal, Ravi and Yaron, Amir	2004	2	1	2.0	0.030	0.511	100%
7	Strzalecki, Tomasz	2013	2	1	4.0	0.030	0.511	100%
8	Magnac, Thierry and Thesmar, David	2002	2	1	4.0	0.030	0.511	100%
9	Arcidiacono, Peter and Miller, Robert A	2020	2	1	4.0	0.030	0.511	100%
10	Kellogg, Ryan	2014	2	1	2.0	0.030	0.511	100%
11	Dorsey, Jackson	2019	2	1	2.0	0.030	0.511	100%
12	Handley, Kyle and Li, J Frank	2020	2	1	2.0	0.030	0.511	100%
13	Rust, John	1994	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
14	Nielsen, Kirby	2020	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
15	Meissner, Thomas and Pfeiffer, Philipp	2022	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
16	Mehra, Rajnish and Prescott, Edward C	1985	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
17	Miller, Robert A	1984	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
18	Buchholz, Nicholas and Shum, Matthew and Xu, Haiqi...	2021	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
19	Pakes, Ariel	1986	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
20	Crawford, Gregory S and Shum, Matthew	2005	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
21	Hendel, Igal and Nevo, Aviv	2006	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
22	Epstein, Larry G and Farhi, Emmanuel and Strzaleck...	2014	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
23	Frick, Mira and Iijima, Ryota and Strzalecki, Toma...	2019	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
24	Lu, JayFernando and Saito, Kota (self)	2020	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
25	Stanca, Lorenzo	2023	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
26	Skiadas, Costis	2009	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
27	Aliprantis, Charalambos and Border, Kim	2006	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
28	Jia, Panle	2008	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
29	Aguirregabiria, Victor and Mira, Pedro	2002	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
30	Aguirregabiria, Victor and Mira, Pedro	2010	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
31	Igami, Mitsuru	2017	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
32	Igami, Mitsuru and Uetake, Kosuke	2020	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
33	Fang, Hanming and Wang, Yang	2015	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
34	Bajari, Patrick and Chu, Chenghuan Sean and Nekipe...	2016	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
35	Komarova, Tatiana and Sanches, Fabio and Silva Jun...	2018	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
36	Abbring, Jaap H and Daljord, \O	2020	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
37	Schneider, Ulrich C	2021	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
38	Lewbel, Arthur	2019	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
39	Pfeifenberger, Johannes and Spees, Kathleen and Sc...	2009	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
40	Gowrisankaran, Gautam and Langer, Ashley and Zhang...	2022	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Rust, John

1987

19.0

0.182

0.971

92%

Larry G. Epstein and Stanley E. Zin

1989

8.0

0.076

0.874

100%

Gowrisankaran, Gautam and Rysman, Marc

2012

2.0

0.030

0.644

100%

Kreps, David M and Porteus, Evan L

1978

3.0

0.030

0.644

100%

Hotz, V Joseph and Miller, Robert A

1993

6.0

0.045

0.585

100%

Bansal, Ravi and Yaron, Amir

2004

2.0

0.030

0.511

100%

Strzalecki, Tomasz

2013

4.0

0.030

0.511

100%

Magnac, Thierry and Thesmar, David

2002

4.0

0.030

0.511

100%

Arcidiacono, Peter and Miller, Robert A

2020

4.0

0.030

0.511

100%

Kellogg, Ryan

2014

2.0

0.030

0.511

100%

Dorsey, Jackson

2019

2.0

0.030

0.511

100%

Handley, Kyle and Li, J Frank

2020

2.0

0.030

0.511

100%

Rust, John

1994

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Nielsen, Kirby

2020

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Meissner, Thomas and Pfeiffer, Philipp

2022

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Mehra, Rajnish and Prescott, Edward C

1985

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Miller, Robert A

1984

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Buchholz, Nicholas and Shum, Matthew and Xu, Haiqi...

2021

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Pakes, Ariel

1986

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Crawford, Gregory S and Shum, Matthew

2005

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Hendel, Igal and Nevo, Aviv

2006

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Epstein, Larry G and Farhi, Emmanuel and Strzaleck...

2014

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Frick, Mira and Iijima, Ryota and Strzalecki, Toma...

2019

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Lu, JayFernando and Saito, Kota (self)

2020

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Stanca, Lorenzo

2023

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Skiadas, Costis

2009

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Aliprantis, Charalambos and Border, Kim

2006

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Jia, Panle

2008

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Aguirregabiria, Victor and Mira, Pedro

2002

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Aguirregabiria, Victor and Mira, Pedro

2010

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Igami, Mitsuru

2017

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Igami, Mitsuru and Uetake, Kosuke

2020

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Fang, Hanming and Wang, Yang

2015

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Bajari, Patrick and Chu, Chenghuan Sean and Nekipe...

2016

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Komarova, Tatiana and Sanches, Fabio and Silva Jun...

2018

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Abbring, Jaap H and Daljord, \O

2020

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Schneider, Ulrich C

2021

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Lewbel, Arthur

2019

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Pfeifenberger, Johannes and Spees, Kathleen and Sc...

2009

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Gowrisankaran, Gautam and Langer, Ashley and Zhang...

2022

1.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.