Citation Analysis – Optimizing Sales Forecasts through Automated Integration of Market Indicators%: A Comparison of Feature Selection Techniques for Neural Prophet and SARIMAX Models %Comparison of Methods to select Exogenous Variables for Time Series Forecasting %%%% Cite as %%%% Update your official citation here when published %%%%

Citation Analysis

Optimizing Sales Forecasts through Automated Integration of Market Indicators%: A Comparison of Feature Selection Techniques for Neural Prophet and SARIMAX Models %Comparison of Methods to select Exogenous Variables for Time Series Forecasting %%%% Cite as %%%% Update your official citation here when published %%%%
Lina Döring, Felix Grumbach, Pascal Reusch
https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07564

135

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

12,078

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Triebe, Oskar and Hewamalage, Hansika and Pilyugin...	2021	10	5	17.0	0.074	1.000	100%
2	Tyralis, Hristos and Papacharalampous, Georgia A.	2018	5	3	5.5	0.037	1.000	100%
3			5	4	10.0	0.037	1.000	100%
4	Bennett, Christopher and Stewart, Rodney and Lu, J...	2014	4	3	6.5	0.030	0.928	100%
5	Box, \relax George E.P	1976	4	3	6.5	0.030	0.928	100%
6	Parmezan, Antonio Rafael Sabino and Souza, Viniciu...	2019	4	3	6.5	0.030	0.928	100%
7			5	2	10.0	0.037	0.874	100%
8	Ensafi, Yasaman and Amin, Saman Hassanzadeh and Zh...	2022	4	2	3.5	0.030	0.811	100%
9			4	2	8.0	0.030	0.811	100%
10	Castle, Jennifer L. and Clements, Michael P. and H...	2015	3	2	3.0	0.022	0.737	100%
11	Xiao, Yuteng and Yin, Hongsheng and Zhang, Yudong ...	2021	3	2	3.0	0.022	0.737	100%
12	Wilms, Ines and Basu, Sumanta and Bien, Jacob and ...	2017	3	2	3.0	0.022	0.737	100%
13	Bojer, Casper Solheim and Meldgaard, Jens Peder	2021	3	2	3.0	0.022	0.737	100%
14			3	2	6.0	0.022	0.737	100%
15	Jime	2017	6	1	3.0	0.044	0.693	100%
16	Xiao, Yuteng and Xia, Kaijian and Yin, Hongsheng a...	2022	2	2	4.0	0.015	0.644	100%
17	Wu, Zonghan and Pan, Shirui and Long, Guodong and ...	2020	2	2	4.0	0.015	0.644	100%
18	Hall, Mark A	1999	2	2	4.0	0.015	0.644	100%
19		2021	2	2	2.5	0.015	0.644	100%
20			2	2	4.0	0.015	0.644	100%
21	Taylor, Sean J. and Letham, Benjamin	2018	4	1	8.0	0.030	0.644	100%
22	Corte	2020	2	2	4.0	0.015	0.644	100%
23	Kotu, Vijay and Deshpande, Bala	2019	2	2	4.0	0.015	0.644	100%
24			2	2	4.0	0.015	0.644	100%
25			2	2	4.0	0.015	0.644	100%
26			2	2	4.0	0.015	0.644	100%
27			2	2	4.0	0.015	0.644	100%
28	Yang, Hanyu and Li, Xutao and Qiang, Wenhao and Zh...	2021	2	1	1.0	0.015	0.511	100%
29	Hyndman, Rob J and Athanasopoulos, George	2018	2	1	1.0	0.015	0.511	100%
30	Yerlikaya, Bayram Ali and O	2020	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
31	Wan, Renzhuo and Mei, Shuping and Wang, Jun and Li...	2019	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
32	Borkin, Dmitrii and Ne	2019	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
33	Chen, Ling and Chen, Donghui and Shang, Zongjiang ...	2023	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
34	Lim, Bryan and Zohren, Stefan	2021	1	1	0.5	0.007	0.406	100%
35	Wolpert, D.H. and Macready, W.G.	1997	1	1	0.5	0.007	0.406	100%
36	Hong, Tao and Fan, Shu	2016	1	1	0.5	0.007	0.406	100%
37		2023	1	1	0.5	0.007	0.406	100%
38	Tran, H.D. and Muttil, N. and Perera, B.J.C.	2015	1	1	0.5	0.007	0.406	100%
39	Nokeri, Tshepo Chris	2021	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
40	Moroff, Nikolas Ulrich and Kurt, Ersin and Kamphue...	2021	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
41	Vagropoulos, Stylianos I. and Chouliaras, G. I. an...	2016	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
42	Triebe, Oskar and Laptev, Nikolay and Rajagopal, R...	2019	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
43			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
44			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
45	Assaf, Roy and Schumann, Anika	2019	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
46	Gogtay, \relax NJ	2017	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
47	Muthukrishnan, R and Rohini, R	2016	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
48	Ververidis, Dimitrios and Kotropoulos, Constantine	2005	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
49			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
50	Allam, Zaheer and Bibri, Simon Elias and Sharpe, S...	2022	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
51			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
52			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
53			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
54			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
55			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
56			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
57			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
58			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
59			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
60			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
61			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
62			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
63			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
64			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
65			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
66			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
67			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
68			1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Triebe, Oskar and Hewamalage, Hansika and Pilyugin...

2021

17.0

0.074

1.000

100%

Tyralis, Hristos and Papacharalampous, Georgia A.

2018

5.5

0.037

1.000

100%

10.0

0.037

1.000

100%

Bennett, Christopher and Stewart, Rodney and Lu, J...

2014

6.5

0.030

0.928

100%

Box, \relax George E.P

1976

6.5

0.030

0.928

100%

Parmezan, Antonio Rafael Sabino and Souza, Viniciu...

2019

6.5

0.030

0.928

100%

10.0

0.037

0.874

100%

Ensafi, Yasaman and Amin, Saman Hassanzadeh and Zh...

2022

3.5

0.030

0.811

100%

8.0

0.030

0.811

100%

Castle, Jennifer L. and Clements, Michael P. and H...

2015

3.0

0.022

0.737

100%

Xiao, Yuteng and Yin, Hongsheng and Zhang, Yudong ...

2021

3.0

0.022

0.737

100%

Wilms, Ines and Basu, Sumanta and Bien, Jacob and ...

2017

3.0

0.022

0.737

100%

Bojer, Casper Solheim and Meldgaard, Jens Peder

2021

3.0

0.022

0.737

100%

6.0

0.022

0.737

100%

Jime

2017

3.0

0.044

0.693

100%

Xiao, Yuteng and Xia, Kaijian and Yin, Hongsheng a...

2022

4.0

0.015

0.644

100%

Wu, Zonghan and Pan, Shirui and Long, Guodong and ...

2020

4.0

0.015

0.644

100%

Hall, Mark A

1999

4.0

0.015

0.644

100%

2021

2.5

0.015

0.644

100%

4.0

0.015

0.644

100%

Taylor, Sean J. and Letham, Benjamin

2018

8.0

0.030

0.644

100%

Corte

2020

4.0

0.015

0.644

100%

Kotu, Vijay and Deshpande, Bala

2019

4.0

0.015

0.644

100%

4.0

0.015

0.644

100%

4.0

0.015

0.644

100%

4.0

0.015

0.644

100%

4.0

0.015

0.644

100%

Yang, Hanyu and Li, Xutao and Qiang, Wenhao and Zh...

2021

1.0

0.015

0.511

100%

Hyndman, Rob J and Athanasopoulos, George

2018

1.0

0.015

0.511

100%

Yerlikaya, Bayram Ali and O

2020

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Wan, Renzhuo and Mei, Shuping and Wang, Jun and Li...

2019

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Borkin, Dmitrii and Ne

2019

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Chen, Ling and Chen, Donghui and Shang, Zongjiang ...

2023

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Lim, Bryan and Zohren, Stefan

2021

0.5

0.007

0.406

100%

Wolpert, D.H. and Macready, W.G.

1997

0.5

0.007

0.406

100%

Hong, Tao and Fan, Shu

2016

0.5

0.007

0.406

100%

2023

0.5

0.007

0.406

100%

Tran, H.D. and Muttil, N. and Perera, B.J.C.

2015

0.5

0.007

0.406

100%

Nokeri, Tshepo Chris

2021

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Moroff, Nikolas Ulrich and Kurt, Ersin and Kamphue...

2021

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Vagropoulos, Stylianos I. and Chouliaras, G. I. an...

2016

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Triebe, Oskar and Laptev, Nikolay and Rajagopal, R...

2019

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Assaf, Roy and Schumann, Anika

2019

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Gogtay, \relax NJ

2017

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Muthukrishnan, R and Rohini, R

2016

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Ververidis, Dimitrios and Kotropoulos, Constantine

2005

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Allam, Zaheer and Bibri, Simon Elias and Sharpe, S...

2022

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.