Citation Analysis

\DeclareMathOperator*\argmin
Bin Peng, Liangjun Su, Yayi Yan
https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.00941
120
Citation mentions
45
Cited references
11
Sections
7,891
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Breitung, Jo 2011 5 4 8.0 0.042 1.000 100%
2 Chen, Liang and Dolado, Juan J and Gonzalo, Jesu 2014 7 6 11.0 0.058 1.000 100%
3 Han, Xu and Inoue, Atsushi 2015 5 5 8.0 0.042 1.000 100%
4 Su, Liangjun and Wang, Xia 2017 17 9 28.0 0.142 1.000 100%
5 Su, Liangjun and Wang, Xia 2020 8 4 11.0 0.067 1.000 100%
6 Badi H. Baltagi and Chihwa Kao and Fa Wang 2021 8 5 11.0 0.067 1.000 100%
7 Fu, Zhonghao and Hong, Yongmiao and Wang, Xia 2023 17 9 27.0 0.142 1.000 100%
8 Jushan Bai and Jiangtao Duan and Xu Han 2024 4 3 6.0 0.033 0.928 100%
9 Bai, Jushan and Ng, Serena 2002 3 3 5.0 0.025 0.843 100%
10 Yamamoto, Yohei and Tanaka, Shinya 2015 3 3 4.0 0.025 0.843 100%
11 Jilin Wu and Xiaojun Song and Zhijie Xiao 2022 3 2 5.0 0.025 0.737 100%
12 Michael W. McCracken and Serena Ng 2016 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
13 Li, Qi and Racine, Jeffrey Scott 2007 2 1 2.0 0.017 0.511 100%
14 Su, Liangjun and Jin, Sainan and Zhang, Yonghui 2015 2 1 2.0 0.017 0.511 100%
15 Wu, Wei Biao 2005 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
16 Zhang, Yonghui and Su, Liangjun and Phillips, Pete... 2012 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
17 Stewart, Gilbert W and Sun, Ji-guang 1990 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
18 I.T. Jolliffe 2002 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
19 Fan, Jianqing and Li, Kunpeng and Liao, Yuan 2021 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
20 J.H. Stock and M.W. Watson 2016 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
21 Onatski, Alexei 2010 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
22 Sahand Negahban and Martin J. Wainwright 2011 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
23 Clifford Lam and Qiwei Yao 2012 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
24 Ahn, Seung C and Horenstein, Alex R 2013 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
25 Cheng, Xu and Liao, Zhipeng and Schorfheide, Frank 2016 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
26 Ma, Shujie and Su, Liangjun 2018 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
27 Pelger, Markus and Xiong, Ruoxuan 2022 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
28 Fu, Zhonghao and Su, Liangjun and Wang, Xia 2024 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
29 Chudik, Alexander and Pesaran, Hashem 2015 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
30 David A. Dickey and Wayne A. Fuller 1979 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
31 Peter C. B. Phillips and Pierre Perron 1988 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
32 Jiti Gao and Maxwell King and Zudi Lu and Dag Tj\o 2009 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
33 Chen, Bin and Huang, Liquan 2018 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
34 Rosenblatt, Murray 1975 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
35 Tong, Howell 1990 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
36 Bai, Jushan 2003 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
37 Andrews, Donald WK 1991 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
38 Lettau, Martin and Pelger, Markus 2020 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
39 Zhang, Ting and Wu, Wei Biao 2012 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
40 Hansen, Bruce E 2000 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
41 Stock, James H and Watson, Mark W 2020 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
42 M. H. Pesaran 2021 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
43 Bai, Jushan and Ng, Serena 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
44 Hall, Peter and Heyde, Christopher C 1980 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
45 G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan 2013 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.