Citation Analysis – Estimating treatment-effect heterogeneity across sites, in multi-site randomized experiments with few units per site.

Estimating treatment-effect heterogeneity across sites, in multi-site randomized experiments with few units per site.
Clément de Chaisemartin, Antoine Deeb
https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17254

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

7,633

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Li, X. and P. Ding	2017	5	4	8.5	0.078	1.000	100%
2	Liu, R. Y. et al	1988	5	3	10.0	0.078	1.000	100%
3	Behaghel, L., B. Crepon, and M. Gurgand	2014	15	8	27.0	0.234	0.977	93%
4	Walters, C. R	2015	3	3	3.5	0.047	0.843	100%
5	Morris, C. N	1983	2	2	3.0	0.031	0.644	100%
6	Kline, P., R. Saggio, and M. S\olvsten	2020	2	2	2.5	0.031	0.644	100%
7	Imbens, G. W. and D. B. Rubin	2015	2	2	4.0	0.031	0.644	100%
8	Loh, P.-L. and M. J. Wainwright	2011	2	1	4.0	0.031	0.511	100%
9	De Chaisemartin, C. and X. d’Haultfoeuille (self)	2018	2	1	4.0	0.031	0.511	100%
10	Hotz, V. J., G. W. Imbens, and J. H. Mortimer	2005	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
11			1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
12	Angrist, J. D. and J.-S. Pischke	2008	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
13	Hoerl, A. E. and R. W. Kennard	1970	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
14	Wager, S. and S. Athey	2018	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
15	Kline, P., E. K. Rose, and C. R. Walters	2022	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
16	Deeb, A (self)	2021	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
17	Raudenbush, S. W. and H. S. Bloom	2015	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
18	Rose, E. K., J. T. Schellenberg, and Y. Shem-Tov	2022	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
19	Deaton, A	1985	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
20	Menzel, K	2023	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
21	Stanley, T. D. and H. Doucouliagos	2012	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
22	Adusumilli, K., F. Agostinelli, and E. Borghesan	2024	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
23	Angrist, J. D., G. W. Imbens, and D. B. Rubin	1996	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
24	Neyman, J	1923	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
25	Imbens, G. W. and J. D. Angrist	1994	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
26	Eicker, F. et al	1963	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
27	Huber, P. J. et al	1967	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
28	White, H. et al	1980	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
29	Golub, G. H., M. Heath, and G. Wahba	1979	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
30	Santosa, F. and W. W. Symes	1986	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
31	Tibshirani, R	1996	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
32	S\orensen, \O., A. Frigessi, and M. Thoresen	2015	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
33	Datta, A. and H. Zou	2017	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
34	Athey, S., N. Keleher, and J. Spiess	2023	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
35	Roy, A. D	1951	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Li, X. and P. Ding

2017

8.5

0.078

1.000

100%

Liu, R. Y. et al

1988

10.0

0.078

1.000

100%

Behaghel, L., B. Crepon, and M. Gurgand

2014

27.0

0.234

0.977

93%

Walters, C. R

2015

3.5

0.047

0.843

100%

Morris, C. N

1983

3.0

0.031

0.644

100%

Kline, P., R. Saggio, and M. S\olvsten

2020

2.5

0.031

0.644

100%

Imbens, G. W. and D. B. Rubin

2015

4.0

0.031

0.644

100%

Loh, P.-L. and M. J. Wainwright

2011

4.0

0.031

0.511

100%

De Chaisemartin, C. and X. d’Haultfoeuille (self)

2018

4.0

0.031

0.511

100%

Hotz, V. J., G. W. Imbens, and J. H. Mortimer

2005

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Angrist, J. D. and J.-S. Pischke

2008

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Hoerl, A. E. and R. W. Kennard

1970

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Wager, S. and S. Athey

2018

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Kline, P., E. K. Rose, and C. R. Walters

2022

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Deeb, A (self)

2021

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Raudenbush, S. W. and H. S. Bloom

2015

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Rose, E. K., J. T. Schellenberg, and Y. Shem-Tov

2022

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Deaton, A

1985

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Menzel, K

2023

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Stanley, T. D. and H. Doucouliagos

2012

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Adusumilli, K., F. Agostinelli, and E. Borghesan

2024

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Angrist, J. D., G. W. Imbens, and D. B. Rubin

1996

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Neyman, J

1923

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Imbens, G. W. and J. D. Angrist

1994

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Eicker, F. et al

1963

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Huber, P. J. et al

1967

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

White, H. et al

1980

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Golub, G. H., M. Heath, and G. Wahba

1979

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Santosa, F. and W. W. Symes

1986

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Tibshirani, R

1996

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

S\orensen, \O., A. Frigessi, and M. Thoresen

2015

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Datta, A. and H. Zou

2017

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Athey, S., N. Keleher, and J. Spiess

2023

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Roy, A. D

1951

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.