Citation Analysis

Dynamic Latent-Factor Model with \\ High-Dimensional Asset Characteristics
Adam Baybutt
https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15721
118
Citation mentions
41
Cited references
8
Sections
11,346
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Bai 2003 14 6 23.0 0.119 1.000 100%
2 Bai and Ng 2013 5 4 7.5 0.042 1.000 100%
3 Kelly, Pruitt, and Su 2019 6 3 9.0 0.051 1.000 100%
4 Giglio and Xiu 2021 24 10 39.0 0.203 0.986 96%
5 Bai and Ng 2002 4 3 5.5 0.034 0.928 100%
6 Giglio, Xiu, and Zhang 2021 4 4 7.0 0.034 0.928 100%
7 Chen, Pelger, and Zhu 2020 4 3 5.0 0.034 0.928 100%
8 Belloni, Chernozhukov, and Hansen 2014 8 4 9.5 0.068 0.909 75%
9 Bianchi, Guidolin, and Pedio 2022 3 3 5.0 0.025 0.843 100%
10 Gu, Kelly, and Xiu 2020 3 3 3.5 0.025 0.843 100%
11 Kelly, Pruitt, and Su 2020 3 3 4.5 0.025 0.843 100%
12 Belloni, Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, Hansen, and Ka... 2018 6 4 7.5 0.051 0.794 50%
13 Babiak and Bianchi 2021 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
14 Fama and MacBeth 1973 2 2 2.5 0.017 0.644 100%
15 Connor and Linton 2007 2 2 2.5 0.017 0.644 100%
16 Fan, Liao, and Wang 2016 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
17 Ross 1976 2 1 1.0 0.017 0.511 100%
18 Giglio, Kelly, and Xiu 2022 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
19 Sharpe 1964 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
20 Cochrane 2009 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
21 Fama and French 1992 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
22 Shanken 1992 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
23 Cochrane 2011 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
24 Feng, Giglio, and Xiu 2020 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
25 Chamberlain 1983 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
26 Ang, Liu, and Schwarz 2009 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
27 Gu, Kelly, and Xiu 2021 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
28 Feng, He, Polson, and Xu 2018 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
29 Guijarro-Ordonez, Pelger, and Zanotti 2021 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
30 Bianchi, Buchner, and Tamoni 2021 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
31 Connor, Hagmann, and Linton 2012 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
32 Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, Demirer, Duflo, Hansen,... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
33 Semenova and Chernozhukov 2021 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
34 Lopez de Prado 2022 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
35 Chernozhukov, Hansen, and Spindler 2015 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
36 Chetverikov and Sorensen 2021 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
37 Newey and West 1987 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
38 Lee, Sun, Sun, and Taylor 2016 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
39 Liu, Tsyvinski, and Wu 2022 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
40 Vershynin 2018 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.087 0%
41 Yu, Wang, and Samworth 2015 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.