← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Overcoming Medical Overuse with AI Assistance: \\ An Experimental Investigation
Ziyi Wang, Lijia Wei, Lian Xue
https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10539
70
Citation mentions
64
Cited references
7
Sections
9,428
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Agrawal, Ajay and Gans, Joshua and Goldfarb, Avi 2022 3 3 4.0 0.043 0.843 100%
2 Korenstein, Deborah and Falk, Raphael and Howell, ... 2012 3 1 3.0 0.043 0.585 100%
3 Brownlee, Shannon and Chalkidou, Kalipso and Doust... 2017 3 1 3.0 0.043 0.585 100%
4 Mu 2022 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
5 Morgan, Daniel J and Brownlee, Shannon and Leppin,... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
6 Wennberg, John E and Fisher, Elliott S and Skinner... 2002 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
7 Albarqouni, Loai and Palagama, Sujeewa and Chai, J... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
8 Fitch, Kathryn and Bernstein, Steven J and Aguilar... 2000 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
9 Chassin, Mark R and Galvin, Robert W and others 1998 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
10 Pauly, Mark V and McGuire, Thomas G and Barros, Pe... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
11 Morgan, Daniel J and Dhruva, Sanket S and Coon, Er... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
12 Lu, Fangwen 2014 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
13 Summerton, Nicholas 1995 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
14 Price, D and Cooke, J and Singleton, S and Feely, ... 1986 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
15 Bishop, Tara F and Federman, Alex D and Keyhani, S... 2010 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
16 Jatoi, Ismail and Sah, Sunita 2019 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
17 Lopez, Carolina and Sautmann, Anja and Schaner, Si... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
18 Tung, Monica and Sharma, Ritu and Hinson, Jeremiah... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
19 Segal, Jodi B and Sen, Aditi P and Glanzberg-Krain... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
20 Taleb, Nassim Nicholas 2014 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
21 OpenAI 2023 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
22 Jiang, Fei and Jiang, Yong and Zhi, Hui and Dong, ... (self) 2017 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
23 Topol, Eric J 2019 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
24 Pine, Michael and Sonneborn, Mark and Schindler, J... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
25 Obermeyer, Ziad and Emanuel, Ezekiel J 2016 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
26 Niel, Olivier and Bastard, Paul 2019 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
27 Davenport, Thomas and Kalakota, Ravi 2019 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
28 Sung, Joseph JY 2024 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
29 Dietvorst, Berkeley J and Simmons, Joseph P and Ma... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
30 Char, Danton S and Shah, Nigam H and Magnus, David 2018 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
31 Emanuel, Ezekiel J and Wachter, Robert M 2019 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
32 Glauser, Wendy 2020 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
33 Al Kuwaiti, Ahmed and Nazer, Khalid and Al-Reedy, ... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
34 Almog, David and Gauriot, Romain and Page, Lionel ... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
35 Kelly, Christopher J and Karthikesalingam, Alan an... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
36 Chen, Emma and Prakash, Shvetank and Janapa Reddi,... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
37 Wang, Fei and Preininger, Anita (self) 2019 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
38 Recht, Michael P and Dewey, Marc and Dreyer, Keith... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
39 Clemens, Jeffrey and Gottlieb, Joshua D 2014 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
40 Scott, Anthony and Farrar, Shelley 2002 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
41 Ettner, Susan L and Schoenbaum, Michael and Willia... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
42 Xi, Xiaoyu and Wang, Ennan and Lu, Qianni and Chen... (self) 2019 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
43 Vlaev, Ivo and King, Dominic and Darzi, Ara and Do... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
44 Sheikh, Aziz and Anderson, Michael and Albala, Sar... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
45 Mesko 2017 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
46 Iqbal, Jeffrey David and Biller-Andorno, Nikola 2022 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
47 Ibeneme, Sunny and Karamagi, Humphrey and Muneene,... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
48 Frederick, Shane 2005 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
49 Carpenter, Patricia A and Just, Marcel A and Shell... 1990 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
50 Blais, Ann-Rene 2006 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
51 Falk, Armin and Becker, Anke and Dohmen, Thomas an... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
52 Chen, Daniel L and Schonger, Martin and Wickens, C... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
53 Heider, Ann-Kathrin and Mang, Harald 2020 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
54 Einav, Liran and Finkelstein, Amy and Mahoney, Nea... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
55 Petersen, Laura A and Woodard, LeChauncy D and Ure... 2006 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
56 McDonald, Ruth and Harrison, Stephen and Checkland... 2007 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
57 Kovacs, Roxanne J and Powell-Jackson, Timothy and ... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
58 Fainman, Emily Zhu and Kucukyazici, Beste 2020 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
59 Van Herck, Pieter and De Smedt, Delphine and Annem... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
60 Kawaguchi, Kohei 2021 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
61 Burton, Jason W and Stein, Mari-Klara and Jensen, ... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
62 Shanafelt, Tait D and Balch, Charles M and Bechamp... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
63 Hussenoeder, Felix S and Bodendieck, Erik and Jung... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
64 Li, Ning and Zhou, Huaikang and Deng, Wenming and ... 2024 1 1 0.5 0.014 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.