← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\vspace*-3em
Tomasz Strzalecki
https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08796
37
Citation mentions
35
Cited references
8
Sections
1,624
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Dominiak, Kovach, and Tserenjigmid 2023 2 2 1.5 0.054 0.511 50%
2 Hansen and Sargent 2001 2 2 2.5 0.054 0.511 50%
3 Edwards and Phillips 1964 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
4 Phillips and Edwards 1966 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
5 Tversky and Kahneman 1971 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
6 Kahneman and Tversky 1972 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
7 Benjamin 2019 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
8 Augenblick and Rabin 2021 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
9 Grether 1980 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
10 Grunwald 2012 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
11 Bissiri, Holmes, and Walker 2016 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
12 Bhattacharya, Pati, and Yang 2019 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
13 Huang, Tan, Lacoste, and Courville 2018 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
14 Higgins, Matthey, Pal, Burgess, Glorot, Botvinick,... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
15 Medina, Olea, Rush, and Velez 2022 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
16 Cerreia-Vioglio, Hansen, Maccheroni, and Marinacci 2022 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
17 Lanzani 2023 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
18 Cover and Thomas 1991 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
19 Peterson 1987 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
20 Hinton and Van Camp 1993 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
21 Blei, Kucukelbir, and McAuliffe 2017 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
22 Prat-Carrabin, Meyniel, Tsodyks, and Azeredo da Si... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
23 Benjamin, Rabin, and Raymond 2016 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
24 Enke and Graeber 2023 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
25 Robert 2007 1 1 2.0 0.027 0.406 100%
26 Zhao 2022 1 1 0.5 0.027 0.406 100%
27 de Clippel and Zhang 2022 1 1 0.5 0.027 0.406 100%
28 Cripps 2018 1 1 0.5 0.027 0.406 100%
29 Epstein, Noor, and Sandroni 2008 1 1 0.5 0.027 0.406 100%
30 Brunnermeier and Parker 2005 1 1 0.5 0.027 0.406 100%
31 Benabou and Tirole 2016 1 1 0.5 0.027 0.406 100%
32 1 1 1.0 0.027 0.087 0%
33 Stahl 1990 1 1 0.5 0.027 0.087 0%
34 Anderson, de Palma, and Thisse 1992 1 1 0.5 0.027 0.087 0%
35 Fudenberg and Levine 1998 1 1 0.5 0.027 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.