← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Random Utility Models with Skewed Random Components: \\the Smallest versus Largest Extreme Value Distribution
Richard T. Carson, Derrick H. Sun, Yixiao Sun
https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08222
85
Citation mentions
51
Cited references
8
Sections
12,257
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Fowlie, Meredith 2010 6 3 12.0 0.071 1.000 100%
2 Train, Kenneth 4 3 6.0 0.047 0.928 100%
3 John I. Yellott 1977 4 3 8.0 0.047 0.928 100%
4 Quang H. Vuong 1989 4 2 7.0 0.047 0.811 100%
5 Charles F. Manski 1977 3 2 4.0 0.035 0.737 100%
6 H.D. Block and Jacob Marschak 1960 3 2 4.0 0.035 0.737 100%
7 Jesper R.-V. Sørensen and Mogens Fosgerau 2022 3 2 6.0 0.035 0.737 100%
8 Ross, S.M. 2013 2 2 4.0 0.024 0.644 100%
9 Jerry Hausman and Daniel McFadden 1984 2 2 4.0 0.024 0.644 100%
10 McFadden, Daniel and Train, Kenneth 2000 2 2 4.0 0.024 0.644 100%
11 D. McFadden 1973 2 1 2.0 0.024 0.511 100%
12 Hensher, David A. and Rose, John M. and Greene, Wi... 2015 2 1 2.0 0.024 0.511 100%
13 Hausman, Jerry and Wise, David 1977 2 1 2.0 0.024 0.511 100%
14 Horowitz, J. L. 1982 2 1 2.0 0.024 0.511 100%
15 Greene, W. H. 2018 2 1 2.0 0.024 0.511 100%
16 Cox, D. R. 1969 2 1 2.0 0.024 0.511 100%
17 Wuyang Hu 2005 2 1 2.0 0.024 0.511 100%
18 Lindberg, Per Olov and Smith, Tony 2017 2 1 4.0 0.024 0.511 100%
19 McFadden, Daniel 1981 2 1 4.0 0.024 0.511 100%
20 Paul A. Ruud 1986 2 1 4.0 0.024 0.511 100%
21 Jinyong Hahn and Jerry Hausman and Josh Lustig 2020 2 1 4.0 0.024 0.511 100%
22 E. J. Gumbel 1958 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
23 Knuth, Donald 2011 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
24 L. L. Thurstone 1927 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
25 Luce, R. D. 1959 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
26 Daniel McFadden 2001 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
27 Chambers, E. A. and Cox, D. R. 1967 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
28 Cramer, J. S. 2003 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
29 McFadden, Daniel and Train, Kenneth and Tye, Willi... 1978 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
30 Tien Mai and Fabian Bastin and Emma Frejinger 2017 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
31 Tomasz Strzalecki 2023 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
32 Salvador Barberá and Prasanta K. Pattanaik 1986 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
33 John K. Dagsvik 2016 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
34 Daly, A. and Zachery, S. 1978 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
35 Williams, H.C.W.L. 1977 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
36 Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2002 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
37 Geweke, John and Keane, Michael P 2001 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
38 Hajivassiliou, Vassilis A and McFadden, Daniel 1998 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
39 Keane, Michael P and Wolpin, Kenneth I 1994 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
40 Yves Croissant 2020 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
41 Herriges, Joseph A. and Kling, Catherine L. 1999 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
42 Cameron, Adrian Colin 2005 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
43 Cameron, Adrian Colin 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
44 Cameron, Adrian Colin 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
45 David Brownstone and David S. Bunch and Thomas F. ... 1996 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
46 David Brownstone and Kenneth Train 1998 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
47 Richard Paap and Philip Hans Franses 2000 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
48 Dipak C. Jain and Naufel J. Vilcassim and Pradeep ... 1994 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
49 Fiebig, Denzil G. and Keane, Michael P. and Louvie... 2010 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
50 Jagelka, Tom\'a 2024 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
51 Zhengyang Jiang and Cameron Peng and Hongjun Yan 2024 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.