Citation Analysis

Generalization Issues in Conjoint Experiment: Attention and Salience
Jiawei Fu, Xiaojun Li
https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.06779
72
Citation mentions
50
Cited references
16
Sections
10,234
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Bansak, Kirk and Hainmueller, Jens and Hopkins, Da... 2021 5 3 9.0 0.069 1.000 100%
2 Bordalo, Pedro and Gennaioli, Nicola and Shleifer,... 2012 4 2 6.0 0.056 0.811 100%
3 Gaines, Brian J and Kuklinski, James H and Quirk, ... 2007 3 3 3.5 0.042 0.737 67%
4 Chetty, Raj and Looney, Adam and Kroft, Kory 2009 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
5 Hainmueller, Jens and Hopkins, Daniel J and Yamamo... 2014 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
6 Bansak, Kirk and Hainmueller, Jens and Hopkins, Da... 2018 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
7 Hainmueller, Jens and Hangartner, Dominik and Yama... 2014 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
8 Jenke, Libby and Bansak, Kirk and Hainmueller, Jen... 2021 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
9 Slough, Tara and Tyson, Scott A 2024 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
10 Abramson, Scott F and Kocak, Korhan and Magazinnik... 2023 3 2 4.5 0.042 0.644 67%
11 Barabas, Jason and Jerit, Jennifer 2010 2 1 2.0 0.028 0.511 100%
12 Bordalo, Pedro and Gennaioli, Nicola and Shleifer,... 2013 2 1 2.0 0.028 0.511 100%
13 Horiuchi, Yusaku and Markovich, Zachary and Yamamo... 2022 2 1 2.0 0.028 0.511 100%
14 Slough, Tara and Tyson, Scott A 2023 2 1 2.0 0.028 0.511 100%
15 Hausman, Daniel 2008 2 1 4.0 0.028 0.511 100%
16 Eggers, Andrew C and Vivyan, Nick and Wagner, Mark... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
17 Carnes, Nicholas and Lupu, Noam 2016 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
18 Sanbonmatsu, Kira 2002 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
19 Boas, Taylor C and Hidalgo, F Daniel and Melo, Mar... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
20 Allais, Maurice 1953 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
21 Ellsberg, Daniel 1961 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
22 Masatlioglu, Yusufcan and Nakajima, Daisuke and Oz... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
23 De la Cuesta, Brandon and Egami, Naoki and Imai, K... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
24 Clayton, Katherine and Horiuchi, Yusaku and Kaufma... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
25 Stefanelli, Alberto and Lukac, Martin 2020 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
26 Ham, Dae Woong and Imai, Kosuke and Janson, Lucas 2022 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
27 De Mesquita, Ethan Bueno and Tyson, Scott A 2020 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
28 Slough, Tara 2023 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
29 Fu, Jiawei and Slough, Tara 2023 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
30 Abramson, Scott F and Ko\cc 2019 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
31 List, John A and Levitt, Steven D 2005 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
32 Egami, Naoki and Hartman, Erin 2023 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
33 Cook, Thomas D and Campbell, Donald Thomas and Sha... 2002 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
34 Mullinix, Kevin J and Leeper, Thomas J and Druckma... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
35 Huang, Melody 2022 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
36 Adair, John G 1984 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
37 Dragu, Tiberiu and Fan, Xiaochen 2016 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
38 Riker, William H and Riker, William H and Riker, W... 1986 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
39 Ascencio, Sergio and Gibilisco, Michael B 2015 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
40 Guthrie, Chris and Rachlinski, Jeffrey J and Wistr... 2000 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
41 Viscusi, W Kip 2001 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
42 Bordalo, Pedro and Gennaioli, Nicola and Shleifer,... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
43 Wright, Peter and Barbour, Fredrick 1977 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
44 Stigler, George J 1961 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
45 Jones, Bryan D and Baumgartner, Frank R 2005 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
46 Schwarz, Susanne and Coppock, Alexander 2022 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
47 Coppock, Alexander and McClellan, Oliver A 2019 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
48 Hainmueller, Jens and Hangartner, Dominik and Yama... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
49 Lehrer, Roni and Sto 2024 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
50 Druckman, James N and Green, Donald P and Kuklinsk... 2006 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.