Citation Analysis

Advancing Distribution Decomposition Methods Beyond Common Supports: Applications to Racial Wealth Disparities
Bernardo Modenesi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.05759

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

5,341

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Barsky, Bound, Charles and Lupton	2002	8	3	11.5	0.229	1.000	100%
2	Chernozhukov, Fernández-Val and Melly	2013	6	4	7.0	0.171	0.941	83%
3	Nopo	2008	3	2	2.5	0.086	0.737	100%
4	Chen, Chernozhukov, Fernández-Val and Melly	2016	3	3	3.5	0.086	0.737	67%
5	Firpo, Fortin and Lemieux	2018	3	2	2.0	0.086	0.737	100%
6	Oaxaca	1973	2	2	1.5	0.057	0.644	100%
7	Blinder	1973	2	2	1.5	0.057	0.644	100%
8	Fortin, Lemieux and Firpo	2011	2	2	1.5	0.057	0.644	100%
9	DiNardo, Fortin and Lemieux	1996	2	2	1.5	0.057	0.644	100%
10	Fogel and Modenesi (self)	2024	2	2	1.5	0.057	0.644	100%
11	Garcia, Nopo and Salardi	2009	1	1	1.0	0.029	0.406	100%
12	Machado and Mata	2005	1	1	0.5	0.029	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.