Citation Analysis

SVARs with breaks: Identification and inference\Large
Emanuele Bacchiocchi, Toru Kitagawa
https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04973
219
Citation mentions
71
Cited references
12
Sections
10,178
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 C.A. Sims and T. Zha 2006 8 3 14.0 0.037 1.000 100%
2 Roberto Rigobon 2003 6 4 8.5 0.027 1.000 100%
3 Markku Lanne and Helmut L\"u 2008 7 4 9.0 0.032 1.000 100%
4 Emanuele Bacchiocchi and Luca Fanelli (self) 2015 19 10 32.5 0.087 1.000 100%
5 Harald Uhlig 2005 7 5 10.0 0.032 1.000 100%
6 Raffaella Giacomini and Toru Kitagawa (self) 2021 18 5 33.5 0.082 1.000 100%
7 J.E. Arias and J.F. Rubio-Ram\'i 2018 7 5 14.0 0.032 1.000 100%
8 E. Bacchiocchi and E. Castelnuovo and L. Fanelli (self) 2018 4 3 6.0 0.018 0.928 100%
9 E Bacchiocchi and T Kitagawa (self) 2020 29 12 40.5 0.132 0.912 76%
10 J. Boivin and M. Giannoni 2006 13 2 24.0 0.059 0.874 100%
11 Pooyan Amir-Ahmadi and Thorsten Drautzburg 2021 4 2 7.0 0.018 0.811 100%
12 L M Magnusson and S Mavroeidis 2014 3 2 2.5 0.014 0.737 100%
13 M Del Negro 2020 3 2 5.0 0.014 0.737 100%
14 A Carriero and A Volpicella 2022 3 2 6.0 0.014 0.737 100%
15 Emanuele Bacchiocchi and Riccardo Lucchetti (self) 2018 7 3 6.5 0.032 0.659 29%
16 G Angelini and E Bacchiocchi and G Caggiano and L ... (self) 2019 2 2 3.0 0.009 0.644 100%
17 Juan F. Rubio-Ram\'\i 2010 2 2 2.5 0.009 0.644 100%
18 2 2 2.5 0.009 0.644 100%
19 Alessio Volpicella 2022 3 1 6.0 0.014 0.585 100%
20 Chris Sims 1980 2 1 2.0 0.009 0.511 100%
21 J. Faust 1998 2 1 1.0 0.009 0.511 100%
22 F. Canova and G. de Nicolo 2002 2 1 1.0 0.009 0.511 100%
23 Mountford, A. and Uhlig, H. 2009 2 1 1.0 0.009 0.511 100%
24 L. Benati and P. Surico 2009 2 1 1.0 0.009 0.511 100%
25 L.J. Christiano and M. Eichenbaum and C.L. Evans 1996 2 1 4.0 0.009 0.511 100%
26 J. Magnus and H. Neudecker 2007 2 1 4.0 0.009 0.511 100%
27 Lucchetti, Riccardo 2006 2 2 2.5 0.009 0.511 50%
28 L.J. Christiano and M. Eichenbaum and C.L. Evans 2005 2 1 4.0 0.009 0.511 100%
29 Ben Bernanke 2012 2 1 4.0 0.009 0.511 100%
30 T. Cogley and T.J. Sargent 2005 2 1 4.0 0.009 0.511 100%
31 S\o 1995 8 4 5.5 0.037 0.500 12%
32 M. McConnell and G. Perez-Quiros 2000 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
33 Jim H. Stock and Mark W. Watson 2002 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
34 A. Justiniano and G. Primiceri 2008 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
35 Atsushi Inoue and Barbara Rossi 2011 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
36 Drago Bergholt and Francesco Furlanetto and Etienn... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
37 E Sentana and G Fiorentini 2001 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
38 R Klein and F Vella 2010 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
39 A Lewbel 2012 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
40 H. L\"u 2022 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
41 M Bruns and H. L\"u 2023 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
42 S. Iwata and S. Wu 2006 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
43 D Ikeda and S Li and S Mavroeidis and F Zanetti 2022 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
44 S. Mavroeidis 2021 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
45 B. K. Johannsen and E. Mertens 2021 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
46 A Carriero and T E Clark and M Marcellino and E Me... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
47 S. B Aruoba and Marko Mlikota and Frank Schorfheid... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
48 T.J. Rothenberg 1971 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
49 Olivier Blanchard and Danny Quah 1989 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
50 Jordi Gali 1992 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
51 A Uhlig 2004 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
52 Carlo Giannini 1992 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
53 Magnus, Jan 1988 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
54 Emanuele Bacchiocchi (self) 2017 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
55 Maximilian Podstawski and Anton Velinov 2018 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
56 H.R. 2012 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
57 Andriy Norets and Xun Tang 2014 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
58 B. Kline and E. Tamer 2016 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
59 X. Chen and T. Christensen and E. Tamer 2018 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
60 C. Baumeister and J.D. Hamilton 2015 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
61 M Del Negro 2004 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
62 M Del Negro 2007 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
63 P. Hooper and F.S. Mishkin and A. Sufi 2020 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
64 Richard Clarida and Jordi Gali and Mark Gertler 2000 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
65 T. Cogley and T.J. Sargent 2001 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
66 J. Boivin 2006 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
67 Rado, R. 1942 2 2 1.0 0.009 0.139 0%
68 R Caron and T Traynor 2005 2 1 1.0 0.009 0.110 0%
69 M Spivak 1965 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
70 Hall, P 1935 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
71 Lutkepohl, Helmut 1996 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.