Citation Analysis

2405.04816
Eric Auerbach, Annie Liang, Kyohei Okumura, Max Tabord-Meehan
https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04816
95
Citation mentions
64
Cited references
16
Sections
13,006
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Obermeyer, Powers, Vogeli and Mullainathan 2019 11 7 15.0 0.116 0.899 73%
2 Liang, Lu and Mu (self) 2022 3 3 3.5 0.032 0.843 100%
3 Tobia 2017 3 2 4.0 0.032 0.737 100%
4 U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division 2024 3 2 4.0 0.032 0.737 100%
5 Barocas and Selbst 2016 2 2 3.0 0.021 0.644 100%
6 Mitchell, Potash, Barocas, D’Amour and Lum 2021 2 2 3.0 0.021 0.644 100%
7 Barocas, Hardt and Narayanan 2023 2 2 1.5 0.021 0.644 100%
8 Fang and Santos 2019 2 2 3.0 0.021 0.644 100%
9 Meinshausen, Meier and Buhlmann 2009 2 2 2.5 0.021 0.644 100%
10 DiCiccio, DiCiccio and Romano 2020 2 2 2.5 0.021 0.644 100%
11 Ritzwoller and Romano 2023 2 2 2.5 0.021 0.644 100%
12 Mammen 1992 3 3 2.0 0.032 0.585 33%
13 \em Alexander v. Sandoval 2001 2 2 2.5 0.021 0.511 50%
14 Liu and Molinari 2024 2 1 1.0 0.021 0.511 100%
15 2 1 4.0 0.021 0.511 100%
16 Angwin and Larson 2016 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
17 Arnold, Dobbie and Hull 2021 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
18 Fuster, Goldsmith-Pinkham, Ramadorai and Walther 2021 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
19 Wang and Gupta 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
20 Feelders 2000 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Liu, Han, Zhang and Liu 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Gillis and Spiess 2019 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
23 Yang and Dobbie 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
24 \em Hazelwood School District v. United States 1977 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
25 Shoben 1978 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
26 \em Groves v. Alabama State Bd. of Educ. 1991 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Chouldechova and Roth 2018 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
28 Cowgill and Tucker 2020 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Dwork, Hardt, Pitassi, Reingold and Zemel 2012 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Agarwal, Beygelzimer, Dud\'\ik, Langford and Walla... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Kusner, Russell, Loftus and Silva 2019 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
32 Dwork, Immorlica, Kalai and Leiserson 2018 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Coston, Rambachan and Chouldechova 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Viviano and Bradic 2023 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
35 Blattner and Spiess 2023 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
36 Gillis, Meursault and Ustun 2024 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
37 Moran 1973 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
38 Cox 1975 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
39 Wasserman, Ramdas and Balakrishnan 2020 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Andrews and Kasy 2019 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
41 Frankel and Kasy 2022 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
42 Andrews and Shapiro 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
43 Kitagawa and Vu 2023 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
44 Spiess 2024 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
45 Jagadeesan and Viviano 2024 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
46 Kasy and Spiess 2024 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
47 Kleinberg and Mullainathan 2019 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
48 Saez and Stantcheva 2016 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
49 Charness and Rabin 2002 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
50 Dworczak, Kominers and Akbarpour 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
51 Chouldechova 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
52 Kleinberg, Mullainathan and Raghavan 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
53 Liang and Lu (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
54 Henry 2009 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
55 Felgenhauer and Loerke 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
56 Henry and Ottaviani 2019 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
57 Herresthal 2022 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
58 Lehmann and Romano 2022 4 3 2.0 0.042 0.200 0%
59 Romano and Shaikh 2012 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
60 Florios and Skouras 2008 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
61 Kitagawa and Tetenov 2018 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
62 Chen and Lee 2018 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
63 Mbakop and Tabord-Meehan (self) 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
64 \em Griggs v. Duke Power Co. 1971 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.